Does Putin Have The Dirt On Trump?

Last Friday, Trump received an intelligence briefing in regards to the Russian hacking of the DNC and possibly the RNC by top people in the intelligence community, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, and NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers. All experts in their field and highly regarded.  Prior to the briefing, Trump had consistently and vociferously denigrated the idea that Russia was responsible for the cyberattacks on the Democratic National Committee, even saying that he would believe Julian Assange over the U.S. intelligence community.  After the meeting, he issued the following statement:

“I had a constructive meeting and conversation with the leaders of the Intelligence Community this afternoon. I have tremendous respect for the work and service done by the men and women of this community to our great nation.

While Russia, China, other countries, outside groups and people are consistently trying to break through the cyber infrastructure of our governmental institutions, businesses and organizations including the Democrat National Committee, there was absolutely no effect on the outcome of the election including the fact that there was no tampering whatsoever with voting machines. There were attempts to hack the Republican National Committee, but the RNC had strong hacking defenses and the hackers were unsuccessful.

Whether it is our government, organizations, associations or businesses we need to aggressively combat and stop cyberattacks. I will appoint a team to give me a plan within 90 days of taking office. The methods, tools and tactics we use to keep America safe should not be a public discussion that will benefit those who seek to do us harm. Two weeks from today I will take the oath of office and America’s safety and security will be my number one priority.”

In part, the report summarized, “We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the US presidential election. Russia’s goals were to undermine public faith in the US democratic process, denigrate Secretary Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency.”

Yesterday (Tuesday), four days later, The Washington Post, New York Times, Politico, and CNN all report that a two-page appendix was included with the main report.  The information contained in the two pages is reported to contain compromising personal and financial information about Mr. Trump. The material has not yet been corroborated, but intelligence agencies evaluated the sources, considered them credible, and determined that it was plausible that they would have first-hand knowledge of Russia’s alleged dossier on Trump. Thus they decided President Obama, Trump and congressional leaders needed to be told about it and informed that the agencies were actively investigating it.

I will not even speculate about the information itself, other than to say that I cannot imagine anything much worse than what we already know of the man.  Lying, cheating, sexual abuse, illegal activities … what else is left??? Nonetheless, we need to focus more on what the purpose, if the information is verified, is on the part of the Russian government.  Trump won the election as Putin had, apparently, hoped, and will be inaugurated in just nine days. What is left?  What is left is, as Paul Harvey used to say, the rest of the story.  What is left is relations between Russia and the U.S. after January 20th.  What is left is cooperation between nations. Perhaps Putin felt that Trump, with neither political nor foreign policy experience, would be more malleable than Hillary Clinton and more willing to side with Russia in its relations with Turkey, Syria, and Western Europe. I cannot know Putin’s motives, but if it is proven that he ordered the hacking of the RNC as well as the DNC, and if it is proven that he does, in fact, have compromising information on Donald Trump, it certainly opens doors for infinite speculation.

Also included in the two pages are allegations of ongoing contact between members of Trump’s inner circle and representatives of Moscow.  To some extent, this is already public knowledge.  For example, Trump’s choice for national security advisor, Michael Flynn, attended a dinner at the Metropol Hotel in honor of the 10th anniversary of RT, a Russian news agency that has been publicly identified by American intelligence as a primary outlet for Moscow’s disinformation campaigns. Flynn, who was two seats away from Russian President Vladimir Putin at the dinner, has frequently appeared on RT, despite public warnings by American intelligence that the news agency is used for Russian propaganda.

Trump, of course, denies the report.  He let his fingers speak for him on Twitter last night, tweeting, “FAKE NEWS – A TOTAL POLITICAL WITCH HUNT!”  Sigh.  This man and his irrational, rude, crude tweets is exhausting me.  Just once … just once, I would like to see him speak or tweet and make a bit of sense, use proper English, and say something that shows a small bit of intellect.  If this man stays in office more than a year, I will be ready for a padded room.  At any rate, the reason for his denial is obvious.  The narcissist has convinced himself that he won the election without help, because he is great and wonderful, and if it can be proven that he had massive amounts of help, without which he would now be preparing to oversee his casinos rather than a nation, his ego couldn’t handle it.

Just to be clear, what I have written here is speculation based on information that the U.S. intelligence agencies have NOT yet confirmed.  I am merely saying that there is some logic to the assumption, and I do not believe that the FBI would have included this information if they did not believe in the credibility of their sources.  I think there is enough smoke to believe there is a fire somewhere. But, before we can draw further conclusions, we must have facts (you know, those silly, cumbersome little details that are not supposed to matter in this post-truth world?).  I think that either way, Trump needs to remember that Russia is not our ally, but that Western European nations are.  His praise of Putin in recent months is concerning, whether or not the Russian government now has the means to blackmail him. Our European allies have been understandably nervous ever since Trump’s electoral win in November, but tensions are even higher in light of these latest developments. 17 current and former officials from a range of Central and Eastern European countries wrote in a letter to Trump that reads, in part:

“Putin does not seek American greatness. As your allies, we do. As your treaty-bound allies, we appeal to Americans in the new U.S. Administration and Congress to stand firm in the defense of our common goals and interests: peace, Atlantic strength, and freedom.”

The letter was signed by one sitting European leader, Bulgarian President Rosen Plevneliev, and several former heads of government and foreign ministers, including former Romanian president Traian Băsescu, former Estonian president Toomas Hendrik Ilves, former Latvian president Vaira Vīķe-Freiberga, and former Swedish prime minister and foreign minister Carl Bildt.

While not jumping to conclusions, it would serve us well to remember that Trump’s campaign has been shrouded in controversy and that his ability to be discreet and keep his mouth shut and fingers off Twitter seems nil.  If, in fact, the allegations are proven, it makes Trump the most compromised president in modern U.S. history.  What does that mean for his presidency?  Stay tuned, folks  ….

21 thoughts on “Does Putin Have The Dirt On Trump?

  1. If they do have dirt on Trump, will his supporters care? They overlooked his mocking a disabled reporter, calling for his ‘2nd amendment’ to take care of Hillary Clinton, calling for the Russians to hack into Hillary’s emails and the famous Billy Bush ‘feline capturing’ tape. Will this just be another instance of Donald just being Donald?

    Liked by 1 person

    • I suspect, given his personality and behaviours in general, even a ‘general dossier’ would be full of inappropriate speech and action, shall we say. The man is not known for tact and diplomacy. 🙂


  2. Jill, I think we spoke of this before. Of course, Russia has a dossier on every major player in the world, including a thick dossier on our President-elect. Senator Marco Rubio said in October how it was unfair to read emails leaked by the Russians, as the next time it could be us. The Donald has an entire career of exploitation, bullying, lying and sexual harassment. There is plenty that could be used at the appropriate time against this man.

    Good post, Keith

    Liked by 1 person

      • All the while I thought he was just stupid, but according to this, he is cunning and devious. What is so frightening is that it seems the majority of citizens do not bother to check facts or search for credible information, but rather rely solely on what da trumpeter says. As I told Herb this morning, I wish I could see just one small bit of hope on the horizon, but frankly I don’t. 😥 Thanks for sharing this article, Hugh … very enlightening!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jill, Hugh, the term gaslighting is appropriate. Again, he is a very good marketer and sales person. He cares more about the sale and less the delivery. That has been his history and why he is accused so often of misrepresentation. He is doing nothing now or during the campaign any different than his business. Keith

        Liked by 1 person

        • I actually had to look the term up … and the definition “manipulate (someone) by psychological means into questioning their own sanity,” fit so well! Sigh. I wish he had stuck with his damn casinos and hotels and left us alone!

          Liked by 1 person

          • Jill, I was looking forward to his becoming less relevant. Unfortunately, we will have a daily feed of his latest tweet and how others are scurrying to explain it away. It is interesting that many of his cabinet nominees are disagreeing with Trump. I don’t know if they do or they are following his recipe of saying anything to close the deal. Keith

            Liked by 1 person

            • So was I, my friend. I was looking forward to being able to write about things other than Trump, but he keeps doing unconscionable things and I find I cannot just ‘leave it alone’, or at least not for long.


  3. If Trump has done anything blackmailable (is that a word?) in Russia, the odds are heavily in favor of them having the goods on him. That does not bode well for us as a nation whether we support Trump or not.

    If you recall, the Russian Parliament openly celebrated Trump’s victory as the results became known. When has Russia ever toasted the election of a U.S. president before? Trump has surrounded himself with people with very favorable relationships with Russia and Putin as well. Ass that he steadfastly refused to release tax information even after allegations of his businesses being funded by Russian interests, and there’s a trail of suspicious but still circumstantial evidence at this point.

    If this doesn’t hurt America outright, this will do considerable damage to our interests abroad as well as damage to the relationship with our allies. Only time will show us what we will reap.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Yes, time will tell, and I have a feeling it is not going to be a pretty story. This is only the beginning, as the man has not even taken the oath of office yet.And no matter what ‘dirt’ the Russians have, even if we find out today that there is something horrible beyond all imaginings, it is too late. My biggest immediate concern is his disdain for the press, and what that may mean for freedom of the press … our ability to know what is being said and done.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Dear Jill,
    The person who knows what goods the Russians have is DT. Whatever DT did that was on-toward during his 2013 sojourn to Russia, Russian agents have this data.

    Many moons ago, while I was living in Belgium, I set up tours to different countries including Russia. It was important for folks joining me on a trip to Russia to know that if you are anyone of importance, anything that you do and say will be collected for possible usage in the future. Everyone understood the importance of being on one’s best behavior. I actually have a couple of funny stories about how I know for certain that what I am alleging is true..

    Frankly, If DT was not on his best behavior while he was in Russia, Russian agents have this data in their files. If there is anything, it is crucial that he informs the CIA. He may not yet get this, but he needs their services.

    Hugs, Gronda

    Liked by 2 people

    • I do not think DT is capable of good behaviour wherever he is, so it is highly likely that he has done something that would at the very least be highly embarrassing, if not outright treasonous. Gronda — you have piqued my interest and now I am dying to hear your funny stories!!! Hope you decide to share a few with us … we all need some “funny” in our lives these days. Hugs!

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Your caution is reassuring — but hardly necessary. The evidence is mounting though, as you point out, the man’s ego will not allow that he had any help whatever in winning this election. He has a net around himself that protects him from any information that might lesson his own sense of self-importance. Indeed, he lives in his own little world where he takes up 90% of the space while the other 10% is under constant scrutiny and in danger of being reduced if any criticism is detected!

    Liked by 2 people

    • Yes, I was cautious, but the main reason is I want to maintain a high standard of credibility with my readers. I spend the bulk of my time researching, trying to make sure that I am factually correct and that though some may disagree with my opinions, they cannot question my facts. Still, I do sometimes jump the gun and make mistakes. This one, though, is like playing with fire, and I didn’t think it wise to make a definite stand one way or the other. I want people to feel that they can believe what I say. Yes, he lives in his own little post-truth world where if the puzzle piece does not fit where he wants it, he gets out his pocket knife and trims it until it does. Sigh. What have we done?????????????????????


  6. Dear Jill,
    If nothing else, maybe this may cause DT some pause in his dealings with Russia.I am speculating that the report does contain errors. Where I suspect that there may be substance has to do with his 2013 trip to Russia. We shall see.

    Hugs, Gronda

    Liked by 1 person

I would like to hear your opinion, so please comment if you feel so inclined.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s