Bring Your Gun To School Day? Let’s Not.

It makes sense, if you think about it.  Donald Trump hates schools.  He hates children.  It stands to reason that a man who can barely speak in more than 2-syllable sentences, a man who cannot string an entire sentence together either in writing or verbally, is not likely to care a whit about education.  Add to that, the fact that he nominated an unqualified woman who also hates schools and children for Secretary of Education, and … well, it’s proof enough for me that he simply hates schools and children.  He has far more respect for the uneducated … he even said that in a campaign stop in Nevada last February: “We won with highly-educated, we won with poorly educated! I love the poorly educated!

So it should come as no surprise to anybody that he has another part of his plan to completely destroy the U.S. educational system, and with it the children, the next generation, and the future of our nation.  One of his campaign promises:  “I will get rid of gun-free zones on schools, and — you have to — and on military bases. My first day, it gets signed, okay? My first day. There’s no more gun-free zones.” And of course Betsy DeVos will support him on that, as she previously claimed that schools needed to have guns to fight off bear attacks!!!

All joking aside, however, while Trump claims that our nation’s greatest threat is terrorism and therefore we should ban all Muslims from certain countries from our nation, the reality is that guns in the hands of the wrong people … not necessarily even bad people, but simply people who make mistakes, people who get angry … are 17 times more likely to kill than are terrorists.  The last thing we need is for schools to become shooting ranges, with stressed parents walking into a school with a gun under their belt.

The gun-free zone initiative prohibits individuals having or taking out a gun within 1,000 feet of public or private school grounds. Congress passed the act, and it was signed into law by President George H.W. Bush. It has been challenged and revised, but is still in effect today (no, Trump didn’t manage to ‘get rid’ of it on his first day), and its repeal would require more than an executive order.  Congress would have to repeal the most current “gun-free zone act,” or pass a bill that would eliminate the restrictions. A year ago, I would have said that Congress would never do that, but today I am less certain.  And another option, of course, is that Trump could simply instruct … or ‘encourage’ … agencies not to enforce the existing law.  Would they?  Who knows, but given his propensity for bullying and, whenever possible, firing those who oppose him, it is certainly a question to consider. And, with Jeff Sessions now serving as U.S. Attorney General, even if the law is enforced at the local level, it may fall through at the state or federal.

The NRA spent over $30 million on Trump’s campaign last year, in addition to another $20 million on the campaigns of five senate-hopefuls:  Richard Burr (NC), Marco Rubio (FL), Roy Blunt (MD), Todd Young (IN), Joe Hack (NV), and Rob Portman (OH).  Of those, only one, Joe Hack, lost his election.  The NRA wants some things in return, including fewer, more lenient, gun regulations.  They now own at least a part of Trump and the five U.S. senators named above.

A bit of trivia: Perhaps the earliest shooting to happen on school or college property, in what would become the United States, was the notorious Enoch Brown school massacre during the Pontiac’s War. Three Native Americans entered the schoolhouse near present-day Greencastle, Pennsylvania, shot and killed schoolmaster Enoch Brown, and nine children (reports vary). Only two children survived.

The last thing we need in this country is another Sandy Hook.  In this century alone, just 16 years and one month, there have been 187 school shootings in the U.S., resulting in 250 deaths and 180 injuries.  To abandon the gun-free zone law would be to invite more, not less …. to make our children far less safe.  But that is what Donald Trump promised those who would vote for him, and so far he seems determined to keep those promises, including keeping our children poorly educated and unsafe.

My inspiration for this post came from Nicholas Kristof’s column yesterday, titled Husbands Are Deadlier Than Terrorists.   I took a seed from his column and veered off in a different direction, but please do read his column … he provides a very sound take on the threat of terrorism vs. the threat of citizens with guns.

12 thoughts on “Bring Your Gun To School Day? Let’s Not.

  1. I find it kind of ironic that Ms.Dennison chooses to use trivia of the Enoch Brown school in the same rant for the gun-free zones. Now it appears to me that this is a shining example of a determined armed villain counts on the school to be an easy target and unarmed. Exactly what she says.
    In most of the mass killings , be it schools or whatever, have been a free-for-all killing ground until protectors with guns arrive. Your rhetoric is neat but your pencils and books are no match for an armed intruder. These shooters are very aware of the gun-free environment. Unfortunately most of these mass school shooters are troubled student amateurs. The presence of a trained, professional protector, NOT a teacher, on site would easily terminate any amateur threat immediately or soon after.
    It is also painfully obvious that this is a blatantly partisan rant that drags political nonsense into an issue that requires intense pointed ADULT consideration to address this problem to PROTECT our children. No matter what side you are on your perpetual political blame game is both annoying and petty nonsense. Especially when it is professed by “educators”. Sorta makes you sound like your children don’t it? Get over yourselves. Act like responsible ADULTS. Like it or not Trump is President. And has been for over a year. How about you make a greater effort to cure the “poorly educated” and get on with your job. I really don’t give a crap about who you voted for in the last cycle. Feel free to vote your opinion on the next cycle. That’s your right. A bit of trivia: Because this is a democracy your guy won’t always win. I thought you knew that!
    Until your choice gets elected let’s try to figure this out as adults! Politics be damned!

    Like

    • Ah, Bob … I’m afraid I am missing your point altogether here. I am for strong and sensible gun regulations, and frankly do not believe that guns ever belong in the hands of civilians, but sensibly realize I am in the minority there. However, this post is more than a year old, and I’m not clear what point you are trying to make, nor why you are commenting on it now. At any rate, I welcome all respectful comments on this blog, and yours is bordering on the disrespectful. In the future, if you have something to say, please say it in a different tone. Thank you.

      Like

  2. I own a gun and have a CWP, and I could not imagine wanting to take my gun to school for a second if I went back to teaching. Like everything else in education (although the gun issue isn’t only about schools), I doubt the powers gave any consideration to what the teachers want, as I can’t imagine many would want to carry in their classrooms.

    Liked by 1 person

    • No, I’m certain the teachers’ opinions aren’t being asked on that or any other issue. In fact, DeVos is a harsh critic of the NEA. I count a number of teachers among my friends, and not a single one supports guns in schools. On a related note, I have a number of friends who are Special Ed teachers and they are truly horrified at DeVos’ appointment. I also have a grandson with Down’s Syndrome who has benefited so much from 8 years now of special ed, but we fear he may not have the opportunity going forward. So many bad decisions that I cannot even list them all, but guns in the schools … NO … just no. sigh.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Jill, our nation’s leaders need to act like parents and not puppets for a lobbyist who represents gun sellers, not buyers. Most gun owners do not belong to this lobbyist group and are mostly responsible. But, we need to do more.

    Guns on college campuses and schools ranks up there with some of the dumbest ideas ever. College campuses have a greater propensity for depression than in general society. And, it all it takes is one impulsive act.

    Two-thirds of our gun deaths in America are suicides. Homes that have guns have a much higher rate of suicide than homes without. Of the remaining gun deaths, they are what happens everyday, not from mass shootings. Access to a gun makes an escalating argument a homicide.

    This lobbying group intimidates legislators, but we need more with chutzpah to pass logical measures that will aid in this effort. A President kowtowing to this industry because a rabid group of gun owners does not make us safer. It enables more gun deaths. Period.

    Keith

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Dear Jill,

    DT is selling fear for his own purposes. As I have previously said, I am more fearful of DT’s actions than I am of a harm from a terrorist. NRA is also in the business of selling fear. Both like the easy solution sound bites which back their agendas like more guns or banning Muslims.We are to resist these divisive tactics which includes this selling of fear.

    Hugs, Gronda

    Liked by 1 person

I would like to hear your opinion, so please comment if you feel so inclined.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s