Bye-Bye Bannon …

The Federal government is now filled with newbies who do not understand the jobs to which they have been assigned, do not understand governance, and are highly unqualified for the positions they occupy.  This includes the president, vice president and nearly all cabinet members, as well as other advisors.  They came into office thinking they would make their own rules as they went along, but after nearly three months, they are finding that actions have consequences, and appear to be floundering like fish out of water, while at the same time trying to cover their foibles and give the appearance that this is all part of some grand plan.  Today’s ‘breaking news’ is further evidence of this.

Almost immediately after his inauguration, Trump announced a move that was considered by many to be both dangerous and stupid.  He reorganized the National Security Council by elevating his chief strategist, Steve Bannon, and demoting the director of National Intelligence and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

nscThe National Security Council was established in 1947 by President Harry Truman.  Its primary function is to advise and assist the president on national security and foreign policy issues. It was created because policymakers felt that the diplomacy of the State Department was no longer adequate to contain the USSR in light of the tension between the Soviet Union and the United States.


Steve ‘Breitbart’ Bannon

Steve Bannon, who has been considered Trump’s closest advisor, is a member of the alt-right, a known racist, white-supremacist, neo-Nazi, islamaphobe.  He is the ‘former’ CEO of Breitbart, though most speculate he is still calling the shots there.  He has absolutely zero experience in governance, and nothing in his background qualified him for a position on the Principals Committee of the National Security Council.

Today, Bannon was removed from the National Security Council, and theories about the reason are not in short supply.  The Joint Chiefs chairman and intelligence director are having their roles as “regular attendees” of the Principals Committee restored.  So … what prompted this move?  It depends on who you ask.  Here are a few:

Steve Bannon“Susan Rice operationalized the NSC during the last administration. I was put on to ensure that it was de-operationalized. General McMaster has returned the NSC to its proper function.”

Amy Siskind: “BREAKING: Bannon is off the National Security Council! If I’m a betting woman, with the world in chaos, I’d bet McMaster finally told Trump my way or I’m gone!”

Robert Reich, former Secretary of Labour, Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley:  “Trump reorganized his National Security Council today, removing his chief strategist, Stephen Bannon, from the NSC’s principals committee. Translated: Bannon screwed up so badly on the healthcare bill that Jared and Ivanka have maneuvered to reduce Bannon’s influence on Trump, at least for the time being. But the White House continues to be such as cesspool of back-stabbing intrigue and chaos that Bannon could be back any moment.”

David Rothkopf, CEO and editor of the FP group, which publishes Foreign Policy magazine: “I think if you give somebody with no experience and a political agenda, and a dubious one at that, a permanency, it casts the on-demand participation of the chairman of joint chiefs and director of national intelligence in a very different light, because it’s saying, ‘We are not prioritizing professional expertise; we’re prioritizing political agenda.’ “

A number of White House officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that Bannon’s sole purpose on the NSC was to keep an eye on (former) National Security Advisor, Mike Flynn, who was terminated within days of accepting his position due to lying about conversations he had in December with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.  This explanation makes no sense, because if Trump did not trust Flynn and felt he required a watch dog, why did he choose Flynn in the first place?  However, I have quit looking for anything coming out of this administration to make sense, so who knows?


Gen. H.R. McMaster

My opinion has no more merit than any of those listed above (except Bannon, as he is speaking the party line), but for what it is worth, I believe National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster may have convinced Trump, either with logic (who am I kidding???) or with threat of resignation.  Before McMaster was selected to replace Flynn, Retired Vice Admiral Robert Harward was selected, but turned down the position because it was made clear that he would lack any degree of autonomy, and not even be allowed to select his own staff.  Perhaps McMaster has taken a tough stand on this issue, and it is certainly understandable why he would not want Bannon, who has nothing to contribute, taking up space on the committee while the important people take a backseat.

McMaster is one of the very few people in this administration who is both qualified for the position and seems to be of good character.  Even a majority of Democratic senators voted to confirm him last month in a vote of 86-10.  I was first impressed by McMaster in February when he pushed back against Trump’s insistence on using the term “radical Islamic terrorism”, saying it is not helpful to the U.S. in working with allies to defeat global terrorism.  It said that he has the courage to stand by his convictions and to stand up to Trump.

We may never know exactly what drove the strange scenario as to why Bannon was given a place on the Principals Committee, then removed less than three months later, but I cannot help wondering if this may signal a cooling of the relationship between Trump and Bannon.  If so, that can only be seen, I think, as a good thing.  Bannon is a loose cannon, a self-professed Leninist who has said he wants to “bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment.” 

cautionOne word of caution … let us not get so distracted pondering the causes and effects of Bannon’s removal from the NSC that we take our eye off the ball … the main issue … the Russian connections between Team Trump and Team Putin.


15 thoughts on “Bye-Bye Bannon …

  1. Jill, you reminded me of a post that said we must give our new President a chance even though I had low expectations. Within a couple of days he announced Bannon as a strategic advisor which was as bad a move as he could possibly make. Then he gave him more power compounding the problem. I am hopeful in his remaining time in office, which may be shorter than four years given the Russian involvement, he will listen more to McMaster, Mattis and Kelly, as the issues are subtle and complex. Keith

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes, it did not take him long to demolish any hopes we had that he might step up to the plate and make sound decisions. But let me ask you a question: what do you think his motive was for last night’s air strikes in Syria, and do you think it was a sound move? I cannot figure his motives, but am pretty sure they have nothing to do with the chemical attack earlier this week, as he is not a humanitarian. I think that was merely a convenient excuse. And, I fear he may have opened a Pandora’s Box.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Jill, I saw your dialogue with Gronda on her post. While it may have been done in haste and it may have had some ulterior motive for DT, I do think some targeted action was necessary to demonstrate gassing people is not right. The haste part is we need to make darn sure we are right before we do this. Unfortunately, I do not have confidence in our President’s judgment, but I do have confidence in Mattis, Kelly and McMaster. Yet, there will be push back and we need to be prepared for it. I just hope cooler heads will make important decisions. Keith

        Liked by 1 person

        • I am at the point where I will just wait and see what the long-term results are. I still think there is more to this story than we know … perhaps than we will ever know … and I cannot believe DT’s motives were what are claimed. But … sigh … what is done is done, and the next few weeks should tell whether it was a smart move or not. I’m with you in the hope that cooler heads will prevail. We have too much at stake to leave it in the incapable hands of a madman. Sigh.

          Liked by 1 person

    • Hahaha … you made me laugh! But seriously … I don’t know. Apparently McMaster and son-in-law Kushner do not like Bannon at all, and convinced Trump, somehow, to take him off the Principals Committee. Now, if they could convince him to completely sever ties with Bannon … we might see some shifting of the sands. But I don’t look for that to happen any time soon. Sigh.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Agreed! At first I thought this might be the beginning of the end for Bannon, but in light of later information, I doubt it. But, I’m still relieved to have him off of the NSC … it’s a crumb and I’ll take it! 🙂


  2. Dear Jill.
    Here’s the skinny. Jared Kushner is young and inexperienced but he despises Bannon. Then you have Gen. H.R. McMaster who was in an out and out duel with Bannon Frankly, I’d put money that Bannon orchestrated the Devin Nunes fiasco. Then Bannon was the one who went to the House Freedom caucus republicans to strong arm them to push through the AHCA which backfired.

    And thank goodness Jared Kushner and Gen. McMaster won out on this infighting. National Security issues need to be in the hands of grown ups who know what they are doing.

    Hugs, Gronda

    Liked by 1 person

    • Absolutely so! Sadly, there are very few grownups in this administration, and a whole lot of temperamental children, including the brat in the Oval Office. Sigh. Thanks for the additional info, Gronda! I am going to catch up on your blogs tonight, so I can understand the latest on the Russian investigations! Many hugs!!!

      Liked by 1 person

  3. As always, great great post. I am so happy they booted this slob off the council. Please, please let this be just the beginning. This bum of the underworld needs to leave the WH and never ever be heard from again. Thank you for always shining the light on these vermin


I would like to hear your opinion, so please comment if you feel so inclined.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s