The Unraveling of the EPA

The Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, is intended to do exactly what you might expect from the name … protect the environment.  In the Trumpian world of alternative language, however, it is apparently understood a bit differently:  the EPA is to protect the fossil fuel industry and assist them in destroying the environment.

pruitt-pollutionIf there was a worse possible choice for Director of the EPA, I do not know who it could have been.  I won’t rehash all his disqualifications, but merely remind you that as Attorney General of Oklahoma from 2011 – 2017, Pruitt sued the EPA, the very agency he now runs, no less than 13 times on behalf of the fossil fuel industry, and labeled himself as “leading advocate against the EPA’s activist agenda.”  Indeed, in 2015, he called for the elimination of the agency! Rather like hiring the man who threatened to shoot my horse, to watch over my horse, don’t you think? And it goes without saying that Pruitt rejects the scientific consensus that human activities are a primary contributor to climate change and that carbon dioxide is the primary contributor.

Since taking the agency reins in February 2017, he has:

  • Lied to Congress about a private email account he uses to communicate with representatives of the fossil fuel industry

  • Cut the EPA budget by more than 30%

  • Cut staffing by more than 700 employees, some in key positions that remain unfilled.

  • Imposed a cloak of secrecy where employees are forbidden to take notes at meetings, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests are blatantly denied, and implemented ‘gag rules’, forbidding employees to speak of environmental issues.

  • Shifted numerous staff members to his own private security detail, costing taxpayers $830,000 per year.

  • Eliminated regulations that:
    • Verified emissions from a company’s industrial expansion are what the company says they are. (Now the EPA will simply take estimates at face value. But all these big corporations are so honest that this should work out well, don’t you think?)
    • Blocked a potentially disastrous mining operation in Alaska’s Bristol Bay. (The mine will now go forward, though a single leak could devastate the world’s largest sockeye salmon population.)
    • Required the tracking of methane emissions (this decision was overturned by the Supreme Court).
    • Required data collection of emissions from oil and gas companies.
    • Monitored fracking.
    • Required companies to disclose which hazardous chemicals they’re storing.
    • Protected tributaries of sensitive bodies of water (even though the EPA’s analysis showed it would cost less to prevent the pollution than to allow it).
    • Set tighter emissions standards for trucks.
    • Banned the toxic pesticide chlorpyrifos.
  • Repealed the Clean Power Plan, the Obama-era rules that imposed strict limits on greenhouse gas emissions.

  • Propagated false or misleading information regarding the costs of renewable energy, need for removal of regulations on fossil fuel companies, and climate change.

pruitt lies

  • Removed the term ‘climate change’ from the agency’s website, and offices that were working on climate change have been closed, staff re-assigned.

And just last week, when nobody much was watching because of the holidays …

  • The EPA says a controversial herbicide is not harmful to humans. For the past few years, a debate has been raging over Monsanto’s use of glyphosate, the main ingredient in Round-Up, the top-selling weed killer sprayed on millions of acres of crops across the globe every year. The EPA came down clearly on Monsanto’s side, saying that glyphosate likely does not cause cancer. This contradicts a 2015 report by the World Health Organization (WHO). Score another for corporate profits over global health and well-being.

The U.S. produces the second largest amount of carbon emissions, second only to China, and we have the largest amount of carbon emissions per capita in the world. And yet, we are the only nation on the planet that is not part of the Paris Accord, the agreement within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) dealing with greenhouse gas emissions mitigation and adaptation.

carbon-emissionsWhat arrogance on the part of the U.S. … we are in the process of destroying, not only our own environment, but that of the entire planet, for the effects of pollution are not contained to the country from which the pollutants originate.  I’m sure that if the rest of the world could, they would like to build a giant bubble over the U.S. to contain our emissions, and let us all choke slowly to death on the results of our corporate greed.

The news is not all bad, for there are some cities, states and even corporations that are moving forward with renewable energy projects.  But there are not nearly enough, and the corporate greed of Trump and his rich cohorts is a horror show in the making.

Can Scott Pruitt be removed as Director of the EPA?  It would take an act of Congress, literally, impeachment proceedings with the same criteria as impeaching the president: “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”  Does anything Pruitt has done thus far qualify as a high crime or misdemeanor?  Legally, it is very doubtful, and the bottom line is that it matters not, for the current, republican-controlled Congress, would not even consider it for a minute, for their pockets are lined by the same people who are lining Pruitt’s.  Yet another reason to choose wisely when you go to the polls in November.

17 thoughts on “The Unraveling of the EPA

  1. Pingback: The Unraveling of the EPA — Filosofa’s Word – Power Staffing Agency

  2. Under Trump there’s an inevitability about finding the worse person for the job.
    He’ll spend his declining years isolated from the outside world and thus not having to be aware of the number of books written about how bad a president he was (Most of them written by staffers who jumped the wreck)

    Liked by 1 person

    • True, but have you seen his tweets from today? A sample …

      “Actually,” the president added, “throughout my life, my two greatest assets have been mental stability and being, like, really smart.” He also said he “would qualify as not smart, but genius … and a very stable genius at that!”

      Even once placed safely in a mental institution, I think he will be proclaiming his ‘greatness’! Argh! Somebody wake me from this nightmare … please??? 😱😱😱

      Liked by 1 person

      • Cast(eth) your mind back to your childhood years Jill and a novelty song ‘They’re Coming To Take Me Away’, could have been written for The Wobblemiester 🤪

        Liked by 1 person

        • 😀 Ah yes, I remember that one well, and now that you mention it, I have noticed it popping into my head at odd times lately. They’re coming to take me away, ha ha, hee hee, ho ho … The question is, though, are they coming to take him away or the rest of us who are being driven crazy by him? All a matter of timing, I suppose!

          Liked by 1 person

            • And hmmmmm … that reminds me of a portion of the Beatles’ song Revolution …
              “You say you’ll change the constitution
              Well, you know
              We all want to change your head
              You tell me it’s the institution
              Well, you know
              You better free you mind instead”

              Yes, Roger … I know it is late and I should go to bed. 😪 Been a looooonnnnggg week. I wonder if this week is a harbinger of the rest of the year? The good news is I got my pantry and freezer cleaned out and lost 7 pounds!!! Okay, Roger … I’m going to bed now … 💤

              Liked by 1 person

  3. Jill, here in the United States of Entertainment, we are collectively an unaware people. As a former Republican, one of the reasons I left the party ten years ago was their stance on climate change. Another reason was the propensity to make things up, which the President has taken to a new level. Both sides do this, but it is not a normal distribution and is very tilted to the right.

    What Pruitt and Trump have done to the EPA is criminal. The irony is the creation of the EPA was one of Nixon’s greatest achievements. As a tree hugger and capitalist, taking care of the environment saves lives and money. The dilemma is the fossil fuel and chemical industry do not bear the cost of all clean-up. They do their best to leave that cost for others.

    And, it needs to be said loudly – this is not a jobs or environment issue as renewable energy jobs are growing at double digit annual rates.


    Liked by 2 people

  4. Dear Jill,

    Democrats winning the majority of seats in the US congress will allow for the creation of legislation to reverse many of Mr. Pruitt’s directives. This is why the Dems with others in the coalition of the decent should be focusing like a laser beam on winning democratic seats in the 2018 mid term elections.

    Hugs, Gronda

    Liked by 5 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s