Arctic Splendor … For How Long?

Before I jump in to my topic this morning, grab your coffee and pull up a chair … I have some gorgeous pictures I want to share with you!arctic-8arctic-1arctic-3arctic-4arctic-9Gorgeous place, isn’t it?  Don’t you just love all the wildlife running free?  What?  Where is it?  It is the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.  Feel free to grab a couple of the pictures to remember it by, for soon … soon it is likely that it will no longer be so pristine, so beautiful, and the animals are likely to be gone.

The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), one of the last unspoiled landscapes in the world, occupies 19.3 million acres of stunning wildlands in northeastern Alaska.arctic-mapThis land has long been a source of controversy between those who would protect both the land and the wildlife, and the others who would like to drill for oil on the land.  In 1987, an impact study showed that if drilling were to take place …

“… expected displacement and reduction of wildlife populations and natural processes would cause a major reduction in the value of the area as a pristine, natural scientific laboratory.”

During the past decade, with climate change initiatives, a lower demand for oil, and President Obama’s push to add further protections to the refuge, the controversy died down considerably. And then came Donald Trump, beholden to the big oil companies and caring not a whit for the environment, wildlife, or the raw beauty of the land.Polar bear, Arctic National Wildlife RefugeShortly after taking office, Trump unveiled his fossil fuel-dependent “America First Energy Plan”.  In his first months, he signed several Executive Orders designed to pave the way for opening previously protected lands and waters for resource extraction. In May, Interior Secretary Zinke signed an order that requested an updated assessment of untapped potential oil and gas reserves in Alaska, which could then be used to make a case for drilling in the Arctic Refuge.arctic-10In an August memo, it was revealed the Department of the Interior wanted to lift a longstanding moratorium on exploratory seismic studies in the refuge.  Now – remember the donor tax cuts bill that passed last December?  Yeah, that one … the one that gave all those lovely tax cuts to the wealthiest 1%, increased both our debt and deficit, and left the rest of us in worse shape than before.  Well, turns out that the republicans in Congress folded legislation into that bill that will ultimately open the doors to drilling for both gas and oil.arctic-7This week, the first permit application to begin seismic testing in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), was submitted by two Alaska Native corporations and a small oil services firm. The Department of Interior’s Fish and Wildlife Service was not happy, however.  The Fish and Wildlife Service complained that the permit application failed to provide studies about the effects of the seismic work and equipment on wildlife, the tundra and the aquatic conditions in the refuge.  In other words, no environmental impact study was included.

Peter Nelson, director of federal lands at the advocacy group Defenders of Wildlife, said: “One thing is pretty notable: how many inaccuracies and missing pieces of information there are. It really provides more evidence that industry and the Trump administration are being pretty reckless with this process.”arctic-6The area is home to polar bears in winter and porcupine caribou and hundreds of migratory bird species in summer. No drilling has been done there since it became a refuge in 1980 and no seismic work since the mid-1980s.

Hats off to the Fish and Wildlife Services for standing up for further testing before any drilling is done, but thumbs down to the republican-majority Congress who sneakily embedded this proposal into the tax bill in such a way that denied democrats the opportunity for opposition.

The Arctic National Wildlife Preserve is one of the few such unfettered areas left in the world.  Look back, if you will, at the pictures in this post, and then ask yourself … do we want those beautiful areas to



this …ugly.png

… in just  few short years?

24 thoughts on “Arctic Splendor … For How Long?

  1. Dear Jill,

    Do you realize how long it will take to undo all the horrors like spoiling the Arctic refuge for oil drilling once the democrats take over?

    I was thinking about that the other day. This protections of the Arctic and other national treasured lands would bea top priority.

    Hugs, Gronda

    Liked by 2 people

    • Yes, I think about this often. And in some areas, it may be too late to undo the damage. I just hope we can turn the tides in Congress in November. I had a nightmare the other night that it was 2020 and Trump had been re-elected. 😱

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Dr. Jane Goodall has said : “My mission is to create a world where we can live in harmony with nature.” Our country needs to adopt this as our own mission, before it is too late. The air that we breathe, the water that we drink, the earth that we live and walk upon…are being desecrated and destroyed by our actions and our inaction. Were man to suddenly disappear from the earth, nature would once again regain it’s balance. We are the problem, we need to become the solution…this is not the way! Thank-you!

    Liked by 2 people

    • Quite so. As I have read many a time, the earth does not need us … we need the earth. People seem to think it’s okay just to leave the problems for the next generation to sort out. That’s what we’ve been doing for centuries now. Sigh.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Legislation was passed to make sure this damage wouldn’t happen to this area.Surely someone on the Republican side has the heart to Vote with the Democrats to stop this, surely there are enough Democrats to raise their voices on behalf of this area and it’s wildlife.?………….Please.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Sorry David no. I it has become party over country or even world for the republicans. So worried about the power of their party are they that they are willing to destroy anything to keep power. Hugs

      Liked by 2 people

      • I was actually heartened the other day when some Republicans voted with Democrats to pass a bill to make them the 34th State to pass a law enabling so many poor people to be insured for health care. I now have Hope.
        xxx Hugs xxx

        Liked by 2 people

        • Yes I read about that. Seems the republicans were worried. The democrats ran and gained seats on healthcare, so the republicans went along also so they could claim credit. Hope is important. Hugs

          Liked by 1 person

    • Yep … legislation was passed back when we had a real president and a real Congress. And then, in the reign of Trump, remember that all good things were directed to come to an end, for now there is only one thing that matters … $$$$$$$. And the goal is to make as much of it as possible fall into the pockets of the very, very wealthy, so that they can sit and watch the little symbols change as their investments accumulate even more. No, I don’t believe there are enough republicans in Congress who have either hearts of consciences to stop this. I hope I’m wrong, though.

      Liked by 2 people

I would like to hear your opinion, so please comment if you feel so inclined.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s