The State of DISunion

I did not watch Donald Trump’s State of the Union (SOTU) address last night, for three very good reasons.

  1. I was already not feeling well and knew that having to see his face, hear his voice, and see all those strange contortions he does with his face would make me unbearably ill.
  2. I feared that my strong reaction to having to listen to him would cause me to irreparably damage my laptop, and frankly I cannot afford a new computer at the moment.
  3. The most important reason of all is that the speech was sure to be filled with lies, or as Keith would prefer I say, ‘untruths’. Why bother?  I have better things to do with my time.

I have worked my way through most of the transcript this morning, have read a few analyses, read The Washington Post’s fact check, and concluded that I was correct in my assessment – it would have been a colossal waste of my valuable time.  That said, I do have some things to say (surprised, aren’t you?) about it all.

First of all, one has to wonder why we even have a State of the Union address every year.

Article II, Section 3 of the United States Constitution states that the president shall ”from time to time give to the Congress information of the state of the union, and recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.”

Somehow, I think that goal could be accomplished without all the pomp and circumstance that surround the event these days.  And, with today’s instantaneous communication, the speech seems really to have outlived its usefulness.  In fact, of what use is it to waste the time of Congress, the Supreme Court, other guests and the home viewing audience, just to listen to fairy tales?  Why couldn’t he just tweet it, as he does everything else? I won’t bother to bore you with the fact-checking … you can get that from any of the major media outlets.

The speech is most notable for what was not addressed.

Climate Change.  How can a speech that is intended to inform us about the state of the country, completely ignore the thing that, by most measures, is the single most important issue facing this, and every other nation?  Under Trump, the U.S. has pulled out of major agreements to work toward reducing carbon emissions and has rolled back the regulations that were intended to help protect the environment.  We have seen the results with our own eyes in the past year, even the past week, yet he says not one word?

Renewable Energy.  The future is not in the coal, gas and oil that Trump has so adamantly vowed to protect, but the future is in renewable energy such as solar, wind and water.  Under Trump, there is no major push by the federal government to explore and expand on renewable energy, but a number of states and corporations are participating.  This could have been a genuine feather in Trump’s cap, had he opted to do the right thing, to take seriously the need to distance ourselves from fossil fuels.  Instead, he chose the most destructive path.

Relations with Allies.  Our relationships with our allies are crumbling, thanks to Trump’s policies that have, in many cases, left our allies scrambling to try to make up for the failure of the U.S. to pull its weight, such as in the Paris Accord, NATO, the Iran nuclear agreement, and NAFTA, and the latest threat to pull all U.S. troops out of Syria and Afghanistan.  Add to that the disdain he has shown for the leaders of allied nations, such as Angela Merkel, Emmanuel Macron, Justin Trudeau, Theresa May and others.  We are no longer a good and trusted friend, to put it quite simply.

Poverty.  Despite Trump’s claims that wages have risen, jobs have been created, 13.4% of people in this nation are living below the poverty level.  As the population increases, and some jobs are replaced by technology, the number of people who struggle just to put food on the table has risen and will continue to rise.

Education.  We are falling behind in our education system, as I have mentioned more than a few times, and this is the key to almost everything I have listed so far.  The new trend seems to be moving away from developing minds and more toward job training.  This is a mistake … a huge mistake … and to add insult to injury, this nation has made it nearly impossible for a young person from a lower-income family to go to college.

National Debt.  With the December 2017 tax cuts that benefit almost exclusively the wealthy in the nation, we severely reduced the nation’s revenue.  To maintain a balanced budget, thereby keeping the national debt at current levels, would require spending cuts equal to the revenue reduction.  But those cuts, under Trump’s plan, would come from programs that help disadvantaged people.  Trump’s fiscal plan is rather a reverse Robin Hood – rob from the poor to give to the rich.

Gun Regulation.  The U.S. is the only nation on the globe with almost no regulations on firearms.  Those who claim the 2nd Amendment gives them the right to own an arsenal that includes assault-type weapons that can mow down a crowd inside of a minute are fools.  On this, the 37th day of 2019, there have already been 510 gun deaths in the U.S.  An average of 14 per day.  And yet, this topic was not considered important enough to be addressed in the State of the Union.

There is more I could add, but you get the picture.  The address was a public relations event, nothing more.  I found it strange that he would call for unity, when he has, in fact, been the most divisive president in the history of the nation.  “We must reject the politics of revenge, resistance, and retribution …” he said, when he is the very source of revenge and retribution, he has pursued a divisive political strategy very much focused on his base.  Last night’s speech, like most everything he does, was intended only for his base … he told them what they wanted to hear and left the rest of us with the clear knowledge that nothing is changed, that the state of the nation is _____________________. (Fill in the blank)

31 thoughts on “The State of DISunion

    • Believe me, you didn’t miss anything, and your stomach is likely more settled for not seeing the entire thing. Pelosi, however, was the hero of the day with her facial expressions, and in particular that little hand-clapping! 😊


    • I saw that last night somewhere on Facebook and my jaw dropped, for there are definitely similarities. The difference, I fear, is that while Nixon was corrupt, he still maintained a degree of a conscience, I think, whereas Trump is truly an empty void. I don’t foresee a time that, no matter how threatened he felt by impeachment, he would voluntarily step down. I believe he would fight tooth and nail. It’s frightening, actually, because I think he has no heart in the figurative sense of the world, and would have no compunction doing the unthinkable.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I think that the only hope we have is that he will see his impending defeat in 2020 and will decide not to run for some narcissistic reason like “presidential harassment” or some other nonsense. He would rather not run than lose. His lack of heart is only matched by his lack of a brain.

        Liked by 1 person

        • I do hope you are right. But the democrats are going to really need to unite behind a very strong, viable candidate rather than a field of … what is it now, 33? And the candidate needs to have a strong platform, at least a bit of charisma (that was Hillary’s downfall), and a squeaky-clean background, for if there is so much as a smear, the republicans or the Russians will find it and blow it so out of proportion. Fingers crossed!

          Liked by 1 person

          • It’s going to be interesting. It would be entertaining if there was not so much at stake. You almost hope for Joe Biden to step in because he’s capable of meeting Donald Trump down in the mud with equal venom.

            Liked by 1 person

            • You’re so right. It’s rather like political cartoons these days … they would be funny if only …

              I would very much like to see Biden throw his hat in the ring. I’m concerned that two of the heretofore top runners, Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar, both have already got baggage that will likely render them inviable. We really need someone who is so clean he/she squeaks. We also need unity, and I fear that may be hard to achieve.

              How’ve you been, Don? Enjoying your 70 degrees while we up here are wearing our teeth out because they’ve chattered so much? 😉

              Liked by 1 person

  1. I lasted, barely, for 60 minutes of the 82 minute speech. When considering my age and useful remaining years, I realized that it was a total waste of every single minute spent so engaged…never mind the negative effects on my health, both physical and mental! Your State of Disunion is indeed time well spent and I agree with your assessment 100%! The State of the Union is broken beyond the crazy glue that Trump uses in an attempt to hold it together. Thank-you!

    Liked by 1 person

    • And how long did you spit and sputter after you turned it off? 😉 It was a waste of time, and most sane people realize this, others are still drinking Kool-Aid. Sigh. Thank you for your support for my State of DISunion! He misses the points altogether, but then, that’s what his base wants, and I have finally come to realize that he believes he answers only to his base and the rest of us are chopped liver. Sigh.


  2. Jill, well said. Maybe the three intelligence leaders should say Trump needs “to go back to school” as he said about them when they told the truth. Of course, a real state of the Union would define the greatest threat to national security – one Donald J. Trump. Keitb

    Liked by 1 person

    • Well, I fully agree, but the reality is I don’t think he could understand what they taught even if he did go back to school! Obviously Wharton taught him very little. And I think you are right … there are many threats to our national security, all because of Trump, who is the major threat. Sigh. Can we trade him in on a better one?


  3. I agree with every point.Because education is going the way it is, and it can only get worse there will be few people capable of turning things round. All the real education will be going to the scions of wealthy houses and everyone else will be their work force.
    As a rule you know I don’t generally swear but

    Liked by 1 person

    • Not surprised you don’t agree on that one, but just think for a sec … wouldn’t it be lovely, even though you don’t believe we’re destroying our environment, to have less expensive electricity and a greatly reduced risk of such things as oil spills in the oceans, gas pipeline explosions, etc? Just a thought. Hugs Jack! ❤


  4. I agree with you that the state of the union show is nothing more than political theater for politicians to tell the people what they want to hear, not the truth that they need to know.

    Liked by 2 people

Comments are closed.