Today I am sharing a column by Ross Douthat of the New York Times. The thing I find most interesting about this piece is that Mr. Douthat is a conservative, a Republican, and yet he is arguing in favour of Trump’s defeat in November. It is encouraging to see that not all republicans have partaken of the toxic Kool-Aid.
The Only Way to Remove Trump
To eject the president, you need to beat him.
By Ross Douthat, Opinion Columnist
All you have to do is beat him.
Donald Trump is not a Caesar; he does not bestride our narrow world like a colossus, undefeatable save by desperate or underhanded means. He is an instinct-driven chancer who has exploited the decadence of his party and the larger system to grasp and hold a certain kind of power.
But he is also a reckless and distracted figure, a serial squanderer of opportunities, who barely won the presidency and whose coalition is united only in partisan solidarity and fear of liberalism. He may not be removable by the impeachment process, but is not a king; he is a widely hated, legislatively constrained president facing a difficult re-election.
All you have to do is beat him.
For a long time during Trump’s ascent I wrote columns demanding that the leaders of the Republican Party do something to keep this obviously unfit, chaotic, cruel man from becoming their nominee for president. Those columns were morally correct but structurally naïve, based on theories of party decision-making that no longer obtain in our era of institutional decay.
But Trump could have been stopped in the Republican primaries the old-fashioned way — by being beaten at the polls. His base was limited, his popularity fluctuated, and if his rivals had recognized the threat earlier, campaigned against him consistently, strategized with one another more effectively, and avoided their own meltdowns and missteps, there was no reason he could not have been defeated.
All you have to do is beat him.
After Trump’s administration began and immediately descended into chaos, I had one last flare of institutionalism, one last moment of outrage and 25th Amendment fantasy. But since then I have left the outrage to my liberal friends, watching them put their hopes in Robert Mueller’s investigation, in law-enforcement and intelligence-agency leaks and whistle-blowing, and finally — though with less real hope, and more grim resignation — in the House’s articles of impeachment.
Now that last effort is ending, as everyone with eyes could see it would, with the Republicans who failed to beat Trump when it counted declining to turn on him now that partisan consolidation and improving national conditions have sealed their base to him. The mix of expedience and cravenness with which the institutional G.O.P. approached impeachment is no different than the way the institutional G.O.P. behaved during Trump’s initial ascent, and it leaves Trump’s opposition no worse off than before. A failed impeachment doesn’t give him new powers or new popularity; it just shows that the normal way to be rid of an unpopular president is the way that Democrats must take.
All you have to do is beat him.
Of course, in trying to beat him they have to cope with the fact that he is chronically unscrupulous, as the Biden-Ukraine foray shows. And they have to overcome the advantage that his particular coalition enjoys in the Electoral College.
But in other ways the Democrats are lucky to have Trump to run against, as they were lucky in 2016. In a year when the fundamentals mildly favored Republicans, Hillary Clinton got to face off against the most-disliked G.O.P. nominee of modern times. And she would have beaten him — even with Russia, even with Comey — had her campaign taken just a few more steps to counter his team’s long-shot strategy to flip the Midwest.
All you have to do is beat him.
As with 2016, so with politics since. Liberal hand-wringing about their structural disadvantages ignores the advantages that Trump keeps giving them — the fact that in the best economy in 20 years he can’t stop making people hate him, can’t stop missing opportunities to expand his base, can’t stop forcing vulnerable Republicans to kiss his ring and thereby weaken their own prospects.
Impeachment has only extended this pattern, with Republicans voting to shorten the trial even when it makes them look like lackeys, and too cowed in many cases to even take the acquit-but-still-condemn approach that Democrats took with Bill Clinton. So now most of the country thinks the president did something wrong, most of the country thinks Republicans are protecting him, and most of the country is open, entirely open, to voting Trump and the most vulnerable Republican senators out in nine short months.
All you have to do is beat him.
It’s worth remembering, too, that liberalism is not just struggling in America, with our Electoral College and right-tilting Senate; it is struggling all around the world. Which, again, suggests that American liberals are fortunate to have Trump as their Great Foe. If he were merely as disciplined and competent as Boris Johnson or Viktor Orban, to choose leaders with whom he has a few things in common, he would be coasting to re-election.
Instead it is very likely that he will lose. But it was likely that he would lose in 2016 as well. One essential lesson of the Trump era is that likelihoods are not enough; if you want to end the Trump era only one thing will suffice.
You have to beat him.
Pingback: QsFiles
let’s hope it is that simple, to just beat him where it counts.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well, it’s the getting there that’s not going to be simple. In order to beat him, the democrats are going to have to stop their infighting and unify. Sigh.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You cannot win by “beating” Trump, he will still win by cheating. No, you must TRAMPLE him, CRUSH him, POUND him into the GROUND. Basically, what you must do is SHAME him into leaving, DISGRACE him, EMBARASS him so badly he won’t be able to show his orange face anywhere. And while you are at it, do these things to all his cronies and psychophants.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m trying, my friend.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And my fingers are crossed for you, and Jeff.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks … we need all the crossed fingers we can get.
LikeLike
I just wondered, is “crossed” fingers a religious symbol? hope not.
LikeLiked by 1 person
NO WAY!!! It is only a description of the physical state of the fingers when one is crossed over the other! No religious symbolism at all!
LikeLike
This is unlikely to work in the face of such a shameless person.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The issue of shamelessness aside, rawgod’s prescription of trampling, crushing and pounding will usher in more of what the following quotes describe and warn about:
It’s the Year of the Rat! Perhaps it’s time to create a Rat cartoon to supplement the Pig Boss cartoon at https://soundeagle.wordpress.com/2017/10/18/the-quotation-fallacy/best-quotation-to-win-an-exclusive-loyal-contract-to-make-pig-boss-company-great-again/
Jill, you are welcome to do it first.
LikeLike
Just to let you know, SE, I am not talking fisticuffs or other physical methods, I’m just talking about overpowering him with truth and facts. Stooping to his level would do nothing for anyone.
LikeLike
Given what has already happened since (and even well before) his presidency, if you really still think that more truth and facts will work on him, then I am afraid that a reasonable person is even more likely to conclude that you are further stretching your own credibility, logic and/or naivety.
LikeLike
This is not Donald Trump, this is about what the Dems have to do to win. And right now I don’t see it happening.
LikeLike
Thank you, rawgod. Now you are making more sense and/or being more sensible.
Happy February to you!
LikeLike
I have not always agreed with Ross Douthat’s thinking, but he definitely has some very good points here. I would also add that the Democrats had better consider and utilize those same points…and soon! Thank-you!
LikeLiked by 2 people
‘Tis like I always said about John McCain … I didn’t always, or even often, agree with him, but I always believed that he had the best interest of the country at heart. I feel the same about Douthart, Will, Brooks and other conservative pundits who see reality far more clearly than the likes of Hannity, Ingraham, and Carlson.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jill, as you have noted before, it is not just Ross Douthat saying this. Other conservative writers like David Brooks, Michael Gerson, George Will, Erick Erickson, Shepard Smith et al have voiced their concerns. Gerson from the outset called Trump a danger. These used to be the voices of conservatives. Now, they are persona non grata as the Trump followers would rather get their information from dubious sources like Hannity. Ingraham, Jones, Fox and Friends and Trump himself. The truth has a hard time getting into those heads. Keith
LikeLiked by 4 people
And many of them fully embrace the name “Never Trumpers” and have left the Republican Party. Rick Wilson and George Conway have begun a movement specifically designed to defeat trump and are putting money behind it.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Absolutely so! I have high hopes that the Lincoln Project by Wilson, Conway, Schmidt, Weaver, Kasich et al will make a difference. Far more than my small blog will, for sure. Have you seen their first ad against Arizona Senator Martha McSally? It is brutal!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jill, I have not seen the ad. Republicans who have been derelict in their constitutional duties picking tribe over country should hear from voters and ads. Sanding over Trump’s transgressions do not make us safer or a better democracy. Keith
LikeLiked by 2 people
Here’s a link to the ad: https://youtu.be/FnEK4vKdwbI You’re right … and frankly, I’m not even sure they’re picking tribe, but are mainly concerned with their own self-interest. I truly dread finding out the ramifications of failing to hold Trump accountable for his actions.
LikeLike
Quite so. We need to hear more from them … need, I think, to shine a light on their words, to prove to the followers that it is not a democratic conspiracy to overturn the 2016 election, but that their own are also disillusioned.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And beat him you shall.
Cwtch
LikeLiked by 3 people
Let’s beat him to the drumbeat of Lord Prosser! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll drink to that! 🥂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Finger crossed, dear David.
Cwtch
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow, hard to believe that a conservative Republican wrote this piece. It gives me hope that not all is lost. Still we must do our part 110% b/c the race will be an uphill battle. Trumps approval numbers are still rising?!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Words of wisdom Jill, from a vanishing breed: reasonable Republicans/conservatives. There ARE several who speak out about him. We should laud them for that. I just don’t know how much of a difference it will make. But, I’m glad you posted this because we need all the help we can get!
LikeLiked by 4 people
‘Tis true that reasonable conservatives are a dying breed, but … they are much needed. George Will, David Brooks … they are out there, and perhaps we should spend more time highlighting their words. Sigh. As if I had more time …
LikeLiked by 2 people
Time? I don’t know where you find it Jill!!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I don’t either, my friend. The past few days … it is disappearing into thin air. Sigh.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Johnson has just started his Trump-Alike ways: only certain Journalists were allowed to question in a press conference. Many just left. I get a feeling you soon have a 51st State 🙋♀️🐝
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ve long seen similarities between Boris and Trump … I was told by some that I was wrong, but … maybe not, eh? I hadn’t heard about the press conference and his cherry-picking reporters … but yeah, that’s Trumpian alright. Sigh. I just hope he’s smart enough NOT to enter into any trade deals with Donnie, for Trump does not deal honestly nor fairly. Anything we have to offer, you could get a better deal on elsewhere. Sigh. 🙋
LikeLiked by 3 people
No one seems to report about it. But even Laura Künsberg whose husband is a tory walked out. It is scary. The trouble with Boris is that he relies too much on Dominic Cummings and that man is nasty. I had a look at his blog. Scary stuff https://dominiccummings.com
He sounds line he has good ideas but inbetween comes a lot of racist sh.. out 😔🙋♀️🐝
LikeLiked by 2 people
I haven’t read it yet, but David has written a post about it that I will likely re-blog tomorrow. Ol’ Dominic has flown onto my radar before, back in the early days of Brexit. Thanks for the link … I took a quick look, but will look closer tomorrow. Hang in, my friend. Love ‘n hugs! 🙋
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, I thought my comment ended in the spam folder. Good that it came up. The BBC did a short mention of the journalists boycotting number ten this morning but I had written the comment already. You hang in there too. Am off to work soon 🙋♀️🐝
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think one of my comments ended up in your spam. Otherwise it might look like WP is censored… 😔
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have no idea why, but all of your comments tonight have landed in the spam folder! This is why I review the folder several times a day, for every now and then it does this. Sigh. Sorry, my friend, but at least I’ve rescued them all!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, good. In this case I double checked because I had it before when I wrote about certain tories that my comments didnt turn up 🙋♀️🐝 am a bit all over the place this morning 😇
LikeLiked by 2 people
And then this morning, I rescued to more of yours and one from another friend in Australia! I have no idea what is going on, but I hope it stops soon!
LikeLiked by 1 person
WP does that sometimes. I have to check my spam folder on a regular basis too. 😚🙋♀️🐝
LikeLike
Perhaps WP is allergic to bees. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
🤣😂🤣😂🙋♀️🐝
LikeLiked by 2 people
Agreed
LikeLiked by 2 people
I wish everyone could see how important this is and there’s only one way to do it. Exactly what you and Jeff have been discussing for all of us.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Hi Jill and Mary,
The word “beat” has multiple meanings, and I can’t help conjuring up the image of a bad boy being spanked for a string of misdeeds.
LikeLiked by 3 people
True, but I think we all knew that it wasn’t meant in the physical sense.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So do I, Mary. I cannot understand how people don’t see it … I guess some see what they want to see, believe what they want to believe. Jeff and I are hoping we can make a difference, even if only a small one.
LikeLiked by 3 people