We MUST Protect The Election!!!

David Leonhardt’s column this morning in the New York Times caught my eye because of the headline, but kept me reading because it is probably the most sensible thing I’ve heard in weeks now.  As you all know, I have grave concerns about how the government’s (and citizens’) reactions to the coronavirus pandemic will affect our election process this year.  Leonhardt proposes a truly sensible way to ensure that the election will go on and that people will vote.  Take a look …

Congress will almost certainly pass a very large stimulus bill soon — as it should, because the economy is in crisis. But there is another looming crisis, in addition to the recession and the public health crisis, and it’s one that Congress should be taking as seriously as the economy.

Our usual methods for conducting elections may not work in November.

Yesterday’s postponed primary in Ohio, which is the subject of a legal fight, highlights the problems. Come November, people may still not be able to gather safely at polling places, and election workers — many of them elderly — may not be able to interact safely with hundreds of people. That’s terribly worrisome. As Seth Masket of the University of Denver has pointed out, elections are an essential institution in a democracy, much as grocery stores are.

Fortunately, House Democrats have the political leverage to fix the problem, even if President Trump and congressional Republicans don’t feel the same urgency. (Republicans, alas, have spent more time restricting voting rights in recent years than protecting them.)

Here’s what Democrats can do: Refuse to pass any big stimulus bill unless it includes provisions to ensure that the country can hold a presidential election this fall. That may sound like bare-knuckle politics, but preserving democracy calls for toughness.

Richard Hasen, an election law expert at the University of California, Irvine, put it well in a message to me on Tuesday:

Election bills are notoriously hard to get through Congress. And we don’t know when Congress will be able to meet again. The only way a congressionally mandated expansion of [voting access] for November’s elections is going to pass is if it is folded into one of the existing coronavirus bills needed to keep this country going during the crisis.

On Twitter, Stephen Wolf of Daily Kos Election made a historical analogy:

Fighting coronavirus will take war-like mobilization of govt resources. But even during the Civil War & WWII, we still held elections. It’s essential that Congress mandate & provide funding for every state to adopt universal vote-by-mail so we don’t have a political crisis too.

The basics of a bill to protect the 2020 election are straightforward. It should require every state to allow both early voting (with drop-off ballots) and voting by mail, and it should include federal funding for a rapid switch to those systems in the coming months. About 30 states already allow something known as “no-excuse absentee voting,” which is essentially early voting. Another five states — Colorado, Hawaii, Oregon, Utah and Washington — conduct elections largely or entirely by mail.

Both systems work well, removing many of the hassles, like long waits in line, that can keep Americans from voting. Mail voting has been especially successful at increasing turnout, as I explained in a 2018 column. During a pandemic, voting by mail and early voting have the crucial added benefit of allowing people to cast a ballot with minimal human contact.

It’s true that there is one downside to early voting: The possibility that new information will emerge in the final few days of a campaign, after some people have already voted. But this downside is quite modest during a general election in our highly polarized country. Not many people will be changing their mind in the final few days. And during a national crisis, there are not perfect solutions to every problem.

Senators Amy Klobuchar and Ron Wyden, both Democrats, have written a good starting-point bill. It would require all states to hold at least 20 days of early voting, as well as to allow anybody to request a mail-in ballot. The federal government would pay for the changeover, which would probably cost around $1 billion, relatively little compared with other emergency bills now being discussed.

There are still some technical details to address. I think that — for 2020 only — the bill should also mandate states to create drop-off boxes at polling places, where people could bring the ballot they requested by mail. This would reduce the number of completed ballots that might arrive after Election Day, because of postal delays. Hasen, the election law scholar, raises a couple of other issues, including steps to ensure ballot security, in a Slate column.

But all of these issues are manageable. The key is for Congress — ideally, Democrats and Republicans together — to act now to protect the country’s ability to hold a fair election this year.

11 thoughts on “We MUST Protect The Election!!!

  1. A great share! I had read David Leonhardt’s column in the New York Times this afternoon just as soon as I saw it amidst my inbox. I always find them interesting and informative, much like Nicholas Kristof. I believe that Leonhardt’s plan has great merit and the election must be preserved at all costs! Thank-you!

    Liked by 2 people

    • I always think of you when Leonhardt’s daily newsletter pops up in my inbox, for it was you who convinced me to add it … and a valuable addition it was! Yes, I think Leonhardt’s plan has much merit, but I also think Jeff is likely right, that the democrats in the House will stop short of pushing hard for it. Sigh.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. I love the idea Jill. Unfortunately, the Democratic Party isn’t usually known for playing hardball. It’s the one area I wish they’d be a little more like Republicans. In fact…it’s the only one!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. this bill, as well intensioned as people believe it to be, has the very real possibility of further marginalizing some populations with disabilities, as I am one. What about people who are totally blind who may not have anyone to help them fill out such papers? They wouldn’t have a voice in the election. And lest you say “it’s a small amount of people, remember that more and more people are losing their eyesight, especially in the babyboomer population, due to different eye conditions.
    when it comes to passing legislation and presidential debates, stump speeches and promises lately, none of the candidates running for president ever mention the disabled, or if they do, it’s very rare and given no mention by the media.
    Think about it.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Well it’s been said now and is in print.I hope both sides see the sense in making sure the election goes ahead and you get your needed change of Government. There will be a lot to do cleaning up the mess left behind by the GOP.

      Liked by 1 person

    • I agree with you that accommodations must be made for those with disabilities, but I wouldn’t say this bill creates any additional problems. How do you vote during a normal election? Do you vote by mail, or go to the polls? I think that it would be prudent for people in communities to volunteer to help blind people who don’t have anybody else to help them, for sure. But, it seems to me that it would be easier to vote by mail under your circumstances than to have to go to the polls, and I’m sure your wife and daughters will help you. That said, no I am not minimizing the problem, nor saying there aren’t very many blind people, for I personally know three, yourself included. And it is not right for those with any sort of disability to be excluded, so … you’ve given me something to think about. Hugs, Scott!


      • I usually go to the polls but there have been instances when the accessible voting machine wasn’t set up and it would take longer to do that then to have my wife help me fill out the paper ballot.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Like many things in this country, elections obviously don’t take people with disabilities into account. I’m just thankful you have your wife to help. Many others may not be so lucky, and they may consider the barriers insurmountable.


Comments are closed.