Justice Must Be Done For Jamal Khashoggi

Yesterday, the U.S. Intelligence report on the brutal murder of Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi was made public.  The bottom line, as I said from day #1, is that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MbS) ordered the hit on Khashoggi.  No surprise there … the former guy remained buddy-buddy with MbS and claimed he had nothing to do with it, but those of us capable of adding 2+2 and coming up with an answer of 4, knew better.  So, what comes next?  Apparently nothing.

The Biden administration has concluded that it could not risk a full rupture of its relationship with the kingdom, relied on by the United States to help contain Iran, to counter terrorist groups and to broker peaceful relations with Israel. Cutting off Saudi Arabia could also push its leaders toward China.  I understand the reasons … I really do.  However, I think there comes a point when we must take a stand.  If we don’t, then how can we claim to be a nation of justice, of human rights and humanitarian values?  I share with you Nicholas Kristof’s column in the New York Times that goes into a bit more detail than I am able to do.

President Biden Lets a Saudi Murderer Walk

The crown prince killed my friend Jamal Khashoggi, and we do next to nothing.

nicholas-kristof-thumblargeNicholas Kristof

By Nicholas Kristof

Opinion Columnist

The United States government publicly identified Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia as the murderer of an American resident, and then President Biden choked.

Instead of imposing sanctions on M.B.S., Biden appears ready to let the murderer walk. The weak message to other thuggish dictators considering such a murder is: Please don’t do it, but we’ll still work with you if we have to. The message to Saudi Arabia is: Go ahead and elevate M.B.S. to be the country’s next king if you must.

All this is a betrayal of my friend Jamal Khashoggi and of his values and ours. But even through the lens of realpolitik it’s a missed opportunity to help Saudi Arabia understand that its own interest lies in finding a new crown prince who isn’t reckless and doesn’t kill and dismember journalists.

What should Biden have done?

As a matter of consistency he should have imposed the same sanctions on M.B.S., including asset freezes and travel bans, that the United States imposed in 2018 on lower-level figures who carried out the murder of Khashoggi. These sanctions should also apply to the stooges and front companies that M.B.S. has used to accumulate assets around the world.

“The key message that should be sent not only to M.B.S., and others in the Saudi Court and government, but also to other would-be killers of journalists around the world, is that there is a heavy price to pay for such crimes and nowhere to hide,” Agnes Callamard, who as a United Nations official investigated Jamal’s killing, told me.

The United States should also have suspended arms sales to Saudi Arabia. United States law bars military assistance to security units involved in gross human rights abuses, and that is true of security forces under M.B.S., who also serves as defense minister.

Biden reportedly feared that sanctions on M.B.S. would poison relations with Saudi Arabia. Yes, that’s a legitimate concern, and I agree that it’s often necessary to engage even rulers with blood on their hands. But in this great balancing of values and interests, the towering risk is that M.B.S., who is just 35, will become king upon the death of his aging father and rule recklessly for many years, creating chaos in the Gulf and a rupture in Saudi-American relations that would last decades.

In other words, it’s precisely because Saudi Arabia is so important that Biden should stand strong and send signals — now, while there is a window for change — that the kingdom is better off with a new crown prince who doesn’t dismember journalists.

M.B.S. is the sixth crown prince Saudi Arabia has had over the last decade, and only one of them (King Salman) rose to become king. Two died, and two were deposed. If it becomes clear that Saudi Arabia will not have a workable relationship with the West if M.B.S. becomes king, perhaps we’ll see a seventh crown prince. That’s not the U.S. dictating to Saudi Arabia, but pointing out reality.

“King Salman and any independent advisers he may still have would be well-advised to consider how unsustainable it will be for the kingdom to retain M.B.S. as crown prince,” said Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of Democracy for the Arab World Now. “M.B.S. has proven time and again to be a liability and a danger for the kingdom, reviled and avoided by the international community.”

American officials sometimes say that if we don’t sell weapons to Saudi Arabia, then France or Russia will. But what Saudi Arabia gets from America is not only high-tech weaponry but, far more important, an implicit promise of defense from Iran or other countries. France and Russia can’t provide that.

Some Saudis tell me that it’s a foregone conclusion that M.B.S. will become king. Maybe. But the fact that M.B.S. has detained rivals, like Prince Ahmed bin Abdulaziz (who is broadly admired in Saudi society) and Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, suggests that he doesn’t think it’s a done deal.

“It’s not a given that if you’re crown prince, you’re going to become king,” noted Dr. Khalid Aljabri, who is currently in the United States but has close ties to senior Saudi royals, and whose father was allegedly targeted for murder by M.B.S. “Just apply the law. Sanction MBS! If they sanction MBS, the whole country would come to a standstill, and King Salman would have no choice but to remove his son, even if he doesn’t want to.”

Perhaps I’m biased because I knew Jamal. Some may think: It’s too bad about the murder, but other leaders have killed people, too. True, but M.B.S. poisons everything he touches. He kidnapped Lebanon’s prime minister. He oversaw a feud with Qatar. He caused the world’s worst humanitarian catastrophe in Yemen. He imprisoned women’s rights activists. He has tarnished his country’s reputation far more effectively than Iran ever could.

So, Mr. Biden, it’s not a human rights “gesture” to sanction M.B.S. Jamal was a practical man who didn’t believe in mushy gestures — but he did dream of a more democratic Arab world that would benefit Arabs and Americans alike. And by letting a murderer walk, you betray that vision.

Your thoughts?

18 thoughts on “Justice Must Be Done For Jamal Khashoggi

        • It seems that true democracy cannot exist for long, because human greed gets in the way. Humans … some of them, anyway … always seem to think they should have more, that they deserve more than the neighbor, the guy down the street, or the woman in the next office. So, they invent “standards” which are discriminatory and designed to give them a bigger piece of the pie than others. If we could find a way to rid humans of that greed factor and of the arrogance factor, then perhaps we might actually have democratic nations. Sigh.

          Liked by 1 person

          • Just listening to a short feature, about the USA, and a DJT speech against Biden. He said it was the worst beginning of a presidency. 😉 As i had said, Germany is very very interested in whats going on “overseas”. 🙂 Have a beautiful day, Jill!

            Liked by 1 person

            • Yes, that would be his speech at the CPAC yesterday. I didn’t listen to it, but have seen some of what he said in various news and editorial pieces. As always, he’s an unconscionable liar and an evil ‘man’. I think the whole world is hoping that he never gets back into the Oval Office. You too, my friend!


  1. clear or even the least bit enlightening, but it was mentioned this was the first Biden-approved military strike to be carried out since his inauguration. Thry showed s dhort vidro of something been blown up in the desert. Anything to this?

    Liked by 1 person

      • As I said, the report was highly disorganised, like someone heard something and threw it together 30 seconds before news time. It was not repeated on the morning news. But, as you understand it, what was the military action about? Is Syria an ally of Iran? Was Iran encroaching on Syrian soil? What was the need for using explosives on foreign soil? Is Joe looking for war with Iran?
        Worst of all, why was there a picture of Kashoggi entering the Saudi embassy in Turkey in a news report about an action in Syria that did not involve Saudi Arabia? And why was the story not repeated? Something sounds Denmarkian to me! (I shall never say the f*shy word again, in deference to innocent fish!)

        Liked by 1 person

        • As I understand it, the strikes were in response to Iranian strikes against coalition personnel earlier in the month. No, Joe is not a warmonger, so he was, apparently only trying to say, “We will not tolerate this.” And as to why a picture of Khashoggi was on your news in relation to this story, I have no clue, for there is no correlation that I know of or can imagine!


  2. I hope once and for all to see the President act on this. You cannot arrest the Crown Prince but you could with enough effort ensure he doesn’t become King. If that happens, the next King may well turn the little scrote over willingly for trial.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I read this evening that he will be making some statement about it on Monday, so perhaps he’s decided to impose some sanctions after all? I hope so … at the very least, freeze MbS’ assets in the U.S. and ban him from traveling here.


  3. It shouldn’t be a difficult decision to call a murderer out. What this appears to me to be is yet another example of it’s one rule if you’re rich and powerful, and another if you’re not.

    Liked by 2 people

Comments are closed.