I just have two tidbits of snark tonight … well, in truth I have a bunch more than two, but two is all I feel up to imparting tonight, for I am tired.
The 51st state?
Yesterday, the House passed a bill to make Washington D.C. the 51st state of the union, but that bill is almost certain to fail in the Senate. Not one single House Republican voted for statehood, and that is likely to be the case in the Senate, where the filibuster will demand 60 votes to pass.
At present 714,153 people live in Washington D.C. With only 61 square miles of land, DC has the highest population density in the U.S. Yet, the people who live in DC have no political representation, and the Republicans in Congress would like to keep it that way. Why? Primarily because DC has a majority Black population, and it is the goal of the Republican Party to keep as many Blacks as possible from voting, since they typically vote for Democrats. If you don’t believe me, just look at the 250+ voter suppression bills in process in 43 states at present — all aimed at keeping people of colour and the poor from having a voice. Republicans may give you a dozen excuses for their obfuscation, but when you cut through the bull, it boils down to the fact that if the people of DC had the ability to elect two senators, they would most likely elect Democratic senators and the Republicans don’t want that. Simple.
Of course, Republican lawmakers have come up with a multitude of excuses, such as Representative Glenn Grothman, who claims the district does not qualify for statehood because it does not have manufacturing, agriculture or natural resources. Or another who said it couldn’t qualify for statehood because it doesn’t have a landfill. But, at the end of the day, it doesn’t qualify because it has a Black majority. Apparently those excuse-seeking members of Congress have never actually read the U.S. Constitution.
Imagine those residents of the district … they live, they work, they pay taxes, they serve in the military … with no representation in Congress. I think the people of the district have been remarkably patient … and they deserve better than they’re getting.
One less racist cop
William Kelly was a Lieutenant in the Norfolk, Virginia, police department until he was fired earlier this week. The reason for his firing? He contributed to the legal defense fund of that teenage punk, Kyle Rittenhouse, who killed two people last year in Kenosha, Wisconsin, during a Black Lives Matter protest.
But, Kelly not only contributed financially, he also left a message for Rittenhouse on the GiveSendGo crowdfunding site, saying …
“God bless. Thank you for your courage. Keep your head up. You’ve done nothing wrong. Every rank and file police officer supports you. Don’t be discouraged by actions of the political class of law enforcement leadership.”
Did nothing wrong????? WTF??? The boy, at the time 17 years of age, wasn’t even old enough to own a gun … in fact didn’t own a gun, but he borrowed an AR-15 from a friend and ended up killing two and seriously injuring another! And a high-ranking police officer is applauding his actions??? Tell me again that we don’t need police reform in this country!
Chip Filer, Norfolk’s city manager, issued a statement …
“His egregious comments erode the trust between the Norfolk Police Department and those they are sworn to serve. The City of Norfolk has a standard of behavior for all employees, and we will hold staff accountable.”
And from the city’s police chief, Larry D. Boone …
“A police department cannot do its job when the public loses trust with those whose duty is to serve and protect them. We do not want perceptions of any individual officer to undermine the relations between the Norfolk Police Department and the community.”
So, there’s one less racist officer on the streets of Norfolk, Virginia tonight, but how many more in cities across this nation?
I think we can best sum the current mindset of the vocal wing of the Republican Party and its associates as;
“I KNOW MY RIGHTS! I KNOW MY RIGHTS!I KNOW MY RIGHTS! I KNOW MY RIGHTS! I KNOW MY RIGHTS! I KNOW MY RIGHTS!
Don’t bring facts, rationality and responsibility into you, you liberal snowflakes you! I KNOW MY (white) RIGHTS! I KNOW MY (white) RIGHTS! I KNOW MY (white) RIGHTS! I KNOW MY (white) RIGHTS! I KNOW MY (white) RIGHTS! I KNOW MY (white) RIGHTS! I KNOW MY (white) RIGHTS! I KNOW MY (white) RIGHTS!”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Exactly!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
And ‘somewhere’ in the UK there is a very, very hard line socialist whose ideas of government would give them apoplexy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Heh heh … might that ‘very, very hard line socialist’ live in North Wales? More and more, I am leaning toward socialist views, for it seems humans have proven they operate out of self-interest, not the greater good.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Socialism is riven Jill, just type it on Wikipedia to see how diverse.
If it is to be run on practical lines it has to be a smidge authoritarian to keep ‘disruptive’ elements in line- and it’s when you get into that ground a lot of folk start to feel a bit edgy.
But there again, folk feel edgy about things these days too, so what the trade-off do you want to buy into folks?
LikeLiked by 1 person
A smidge authoritarian is essential in any government, even true democracies, which the U.S. is not. It’s a slippery slope, though, for power seems to lead to a lust for more power and before long you have a dictator. Where to draw the line? As you say, what trade-offs are people willing to accept. Sadly, there is no consensus … some are willing to sacrifice some personal freedom for the greater good, while others (namely Republicans) believe the world is their oyster and they shouldn’t have to give up anything.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They sound like a mass gathering of adolescents (or maybe that’s being too kind to them)
LikeLiked by 1 person
More like a convention of 2-year-olds!
LikeLiked by 1 person
This will really get them screaming then:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-56903805
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a great article, Roger! Thanks! Hmmmm … now how to make the infantile Republicans read it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I doubt if it would change their minds. Probably convince them the BBC is in on an international Socialist Conspiracy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No doubt you are right … they don’t seem to listen to much, do they? Not even their own constituents. Only the rich ones who line their pockets.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And amongst those funding crazies seems to be going out of fashion?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sigh.
LikeLiked by 1 person
PS: Yep, he sits in his tower, glowering down on the world. (Cue: ominous clouds, cold breeze and ominous background music)
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought I told Joyful to destroy that ominous music!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
No wonder I can’t find half my CD collection!
LikeLiked by 1 person
😇
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: on free speech | Random thoughts
That people would individually defend –and support the legal defense of– Kyle Rittenhouse, a 17-year-old KID (!), for KILLING two people is simply beyond mind-boggling!! The act of taking human life is becoming more and more irrelevant.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know … my jaw dropped at the nearly million dollars that was raised for him within a month after his murder spree! People got more money than they have brains!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jill, you and I both know that if the tables were turned, and those voters were white and mostly Republican, D.C would have been a state years ago. They can’t even hide the blatant racism anymore.
LikeLiked by 1 person
and if the tables were turned Jeff, would you and Jill be advocating for Washington dc to not be a state because more people would vote republican? I’ll wait for the answer which I actually don’t expect to receive because when I’m right, I’m met with just silence.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d bitch and complain Scott. But really the point is mute isn’t it? Republicans in power know that black people make up 46% of D.C population, meaning, they could give a rat’s ass about them. All they care about is power. Mitch McConnell’s been playing Dems for patsy’s long enough. They stole at least two Supreme Court Justices-simply because they had power, and they exercised it. It’s beyond comforting to see Dems finally growing a spine against the most despised party we may ever see in our lifetimes. And by the way. South Dakota and North Dakota are two separate states, because Republicans back then, wanted 4 additional Senators. Just a quick history lesson for you Scott. Oh, and if I’m not mistaken, they also did the same for Nevada, which at the time was a territory. I can’t wait to bring D.C in, and hopefully, not long after, Puerto Rico. Ahhhh, isn’t life wonderful?
LikeLiked by 2 people
If every person living in the District where white, I would still be fighting for statehood. Every person, regardless of skin colour, has a right to be represented, especially since they pay taxes! If I lived in the District, I would be raising 9 kinds of hell over having to pay taxes without representation.
LikeLike
Hell yeah it would have. It’s a damn shame, though, that the Republican Party as a whole seems to be the PWS … Party of White Supremacy. I’m just about sick and damn tired of their self-sanctimonious “nationalism” which is nothing but pure racism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hey, Jill, I just left a comment about statehood on Claytoonz blog. I know you go there, so maybe you will read it. Todayz toon was also about a 51st state, and a 52nd state, and maybe a few more.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will check it out!
LikeLike
about statehood, the constitution is pretty clear about that, whether you and other liberals want to actually believe it.
“Article I, section 8, clause 17 of the Constitution, which says that the “Seat of the Government of the United States” shall be a district that is at most ten square miles and separate and apart from the other “particular States.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
The proposal for statehood would exempt the area that is actually the seat of government, ie the White House, Capitol and Supreme Court buildings. But the rest of the district would become a state. Given that, as part of my Masters in International Relations, I studied Constitutional Law for 2 years and read the entire document so many times that I’ve got part of it burned into my memory, I feel I am qualified to say that the proposal for statehood is not at all unconstitutional. Imagine, for a minute, that you live in DC and work, say as a janitor at the Capitol, making just enough to keep a roof over your family’s head and food on the table. Wouldn’t you expect you should have the right to vote for someone to represent your state, your best interests?
LikeLike
Jill, what I find of interest is the world saw what we saw in the Chauvin footage. They saw the testimony from many. One prosecutor noted it was one of the more compelling cases she has ever seen. And, even 55% of US Republicans agree with the Chauvin verdict, with another 20% not sure. That leaves 25% who disagree and side with the Tucker Carlson, Brian Kilmeade, Donald Trump world. At some point, the sycophants who support trumpism will have to realize that being an untruthful bully like the former president will eventually catch up to you.
As for the former Virginia cop, that is about as misguided a move that he could possibly make. He chose poorly and is paying a price for it. Keith
LikeLiked by 1 person
He didn’t choose poorly, he lives poorly, as in conscience poor. If he did his job like he writes online, then he was more than misguided, he was a racist pig!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed, I don’t see how anybody could watch that video and not agree with the verdict of the jury. I’d like to ask that 25% who disagree with the verdict if they would feel the same if it had been a Black cop kneeling on the neck of an unarmed white man. Care to make any bets on their answers? This verdict was the right one … but it’s only a small step toward holding police accountable.
Definitely so. His message to Rittenhouse floored me … and coming from an officer of the law, no less!
LikeLike
Thank you for sharing!!… change is in the winds and there are many who have found their comfort zone (ideological and economics) and are trying to deny any change that may affect them in some manner.. “Change is the law of life. And those who look only to the past and present are certain to miss the future.” ( John F. Kennedy)…. I expect every generation has gone through the process, the difference today is technology has given more people knowledge and a voice… 🙂
Until we meet again..
May the road rise to meet you
May the wind be always at your back
May the sun shine warm upon your face
The rains fall soft upon your fields
May green be the grass you walk on
May blue be the skies above you
May pure be the joys that surround you
May true be the hearts that love you.
(Irish Saying)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Dutch! Excellent quote by JFK … and he’s so right … nothing remains static. Technology has certainly changed the world and I often think it’s time for a re-write of the Constitution, but not in today’s polarized political climate!
Many thanks for the Irish saying and the PPM song! I always did love PPM
LikeLike
Isn’t it interesting which reasons, no matter how cracked, are against their own state of Washington? Happy Friday, Jill! Enjoy the day! Michael
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is. Thing is, though, that none of the lawmakers actually live in D.C. … if they did, I’m sure they would see it differently. You too, Michael!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you very much, Jill! Enjoy your weekend, and dont rant too much. 😉 Michael
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks, Michael! Oops … too late … I already ranted too much. 🤐
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
I feel a sudden breeze, could it be the wind of change?
Cwtch
LikeLiked by 1 person
More likely Joey sneezed. We’ve got a long way to go before I’ll believe that there is any real change in the wind.
Cwtch
LikeLiked by 1 person