If you thought the chaos and violence that surrounded last year’s presidential election was bad, many speculate that what will happen in 2024 will make 2020 look like a walk in the park. Take a look at what Washington Post editor Fred Hiatt has to say … a view that is shared by many political analysts today.
Voter suppression is bad. But this tactic is even worse.
Opinion by
Editorial page editor
President Donald Trump’s effort to steal the 2020 presidential election fell short. Now Republicans across the country are promoting changes to laws and personnel that could allow him — or someone like him — to succeed in 2024.
I’m not referring to the hundreds of GOP proposals in statehouses across the country that will make it harder for many people, in particular Black Democrats, to vote. Those measures are egregious and offensive. They are the strategy of a party that has given up on winning by putting forward more appealing policies and candidates and so hopes to win by keeping as many of its opponents away from the ballot box as possible.
What I’m talking about is in some ways even more insidious: an insurance policy to potentially steal the election if the vote-suppression strategy fails.
Recall Trump’s post-election campaign last fall. Having lost decisively, he thought he could pressure local and state officials to nullify the results.
He implored the Republican majority in the Pennsylvania legislature to defy their people’s will and appoint a slate of electors who would vote for him in Washington.
He urged the Georgia secretary of state to claim that Joe Biden’s victory there was fraudulent.
He pressured the Michigan Board of State Canvassers not to certify Biden’s clear victory in their state.
He failed because enough local officials had more integrity and courage than a majority of the Republican caucus in the U.S. House has mustered. The leaders of the Pennsylvania legislature said they didn’t have the authority to do what Trump was demanding. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger simply refused to go along. One of two Republicans on the Michigan board caved to the pressure, but the other, Aaron Van Langevelde, listened to his conscience, and his vote alongside the board’s two Democrats was enough to turn aside Trump’s attempted theft.
All of this was inspiring to many of us. To the anti-democracy forces ascendant in the Republican Party, it provided a challenge and a road map.
Michigan Republicans chose not to nominate Van Langevelde to another term. Raffensperger will face a primary challenge from an amplifier of Trump’s lies about election fraud, Rep. Jody Hice (R-Ga.), who already has Trump’s endorsement.
“At the end of the day, there were good people on both sides of the aisle who were determined to protect people’s right to vote,” Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat, said in a meeting with Post reporters and editors this month. “If those people change in 2022, then you have a scenario in 2024 where the good people who protected their states in 2020 aren’t there any more.”
Nor are the anti-democracy forces focused only on top officials. Another Democratic secretary of state, Arizona’s Katie Hobbs, told us that “people around the state are very worried that they’re going to come infiltrate poll workers in the next election.” The law requires a balance of Republicans and Democrats as poll workers — but, Hobbs noted, “it’s very easy to change your affiliation from R to D.”
As they target the people and positions that stood in their way last time, they also are attempting to change the rules, so a pro-Trump legislature could more easily override the will of the people — and the objections of any honest secretary of state who stood in the way.
“In 2021, state legislatures across the country — through at least 148 bills filed in 36 states — are moving to muscle their way into election administration, as they attempt to dislodge or unsettle the executive branch and/or local election officials who, traditionally, have run our voting systems.”
That is the conclusion of a recent report, “A Democracy Crisis in the Making,” by two nonpartisan organizations, States United Democracy Center and Protect Democracy, and a nonprofit law firm in Wisconsin, Law Forward.
“Had these bills been in place in 2020,” the report found, “they would have significantly added to the turmoil that surrounded the election, and they would have raised the alarming prospect that the outcome of the presidential election could have been decided contrary to how the people voted.”
One such measure was included in Georgia’s recent electoral “reform.” While many of us paid attention to the mean-spirited ban on giving water to people waiting in line — and understandably so — the intrusion of the legislature into the counting process could have far more nefarious consequences.
This is why it matters so much that Trump continues to lie about 2020, and that House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) and most of his party have abjectly surrendered to the lie. It’s not just about history. The lie is being used to give cover for actions that in 2024 could turn the big lie into the big steal.
We need an aroused and awake citizenry that doesn’t wait til 2022 to be organizing, donating, contacting elected officials, and on and on. We are in the fight of our lives, and we must be positive in order to save our democracy.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Agreed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fully agree to Keith’s comment. There are a lot rehearsals today. Making someone insecure is part of the asymmetric warfare methodology. Michael
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you and Keith are both right … they play on our emotions, and yet … we cannot simply ignore what is happening, either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
😉 xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jill Dennison, I remember mentioning to you that I am aware that we disagree on some issues, however, I also mentioned enjoying your blog. Keep up the good work.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you … I am glad you enjoy it and I appreciate your support!
LikeLike
Jill Dennison, I hope that you will keep your blog updated. Even though we disagree on some things, I find your blog to be very enlightening.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you!
LikeLike
Jill Dennison, I know that spicy foods don’t really agree with you. Having said that, if you have family or friends who do enjoy spicy foods, you are welcome to share any posts on my blog with them or just reference the blog itself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Will do!!!
LikeLike
Jill Dennison, you can read through my blog and share any posts via email with people that you know or if you are on any social media platforms, you can share my posts that way. My blog is solely moderated, however, I will make time to read any and all comments I receive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Ned Hamson's Second Line View of the News.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Ned … you are a gem!
LikeLike
It would be too much to hope that they’d just give up. But it’s a shame they don’t put as much effort into finding some policies that would make them a viable party with some appeal, as they do into devising ways to cheat the result. This is why I say Jo Biden must go all out to win now and get his legislation in place. He’ll be playing from a place of strength when it comes to opposing legislative changes which will make the Big Lie easier to play.
Cwtch
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, from what I’ve seen and read, they aren’t going to give up. You’re right … if the GOP actually had viable policies, they might actually be able to win elections honestly, without cheating, but it seems they’d rather expend their energy finding ways to hurt others than to actually govern. You’re right, but Biden seems hesitant to do that, for it is in his nature to be a peacemaker, a moderate. Sigh.
Cwtch
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jill, it is strategy that has been deployed for some time now. Indict the press as fake, so that all news is now in question. Indict institutions as a deep state, so that all institutions are viewed with more mistrust. Indict the election process, so no one trusts it, meaning power hungry opportunists can seize power as the former president attempted on January 6 with his invitation and incitement. It is an attack on all institutions, so that autocrats can come in as the saviors of stability. We must push back with truthful statements in earnest. As Michael Lewis noted in his book “The Fifth Risk,” the deep state are the folks who serve the country admirably and know what they are talking about, as opposed to politicians like the former president and some Senators who tend to make stuff up. Keith
LikeLiked by 3 people
I agree that we must push back, my friend, but … how? How do we make our voices loud enough to be heard by those who need to hear them? We know the lies, we know the facts that prove the lies to be false, but a large portion of the people in this country believe those lies, are told not to allow our voices into their arena, and … those people present a “clear and present danger”, I fear. Sigh.
LikeLike
Jill, to me, we need to let Republican legislators know they are better than this, the ones who are reachable. There are some whose track record is one of sleight of hand. As we talk to folks, think what would Daryl Davis do? Ask them questions and listen. The former president’s whole career has been predicated on being consistently untruthful. He will even embellish the truth to overstate a role he had or add one where he did not.. So, as he is defended, it is guaranteed something untruthful will be said in his favor.
My favorite is “Donald Trump created a great economy.” He actually inherited a good economy that was in its 91st consecutive month of growth. He did keep it going until the pandemic sank it, but to say he created it is fiction. Keith
LikeLiked by 1 person
You make good points … Daryl Davis is the gold standard. It seems, though, that we are talking to a brick wall when we write or call our members of Congress. They seem not to care what we think. Sigh.
LikeLike
duplicitous bastards
LikeLiked by 2 people
Damn straight! That’s exactly what they are!
LikeLiked by 1 person