As I lay in bed at 5:30 this morning seeking that elusive thing called sleep, I received an email with Robert Reich’s latest newsletter. Despite my better judgment, I started reading the piece and there went any hope for sleep. Peter Thiel’s name has crossed my radar before … he is a billionaire with a net worth of about $4.7 billion who has bankrolled some pretty nasty political candidates, most notably the former guy. I didn’t know a lot about him, though, and Mr. Reich took care of filling in some gaps … some rather disturbing ones. Please take a minute to read his piece, for it is well worth your time — just don’t read it at bedtime.
What you need to know about the anti-democracy movement
Who’s funding it, why it’s inspired by Viktor Orban, and what it aims to achieve
Robert Reich
May 19, 2022
Decades ago, America’s wealthy backed a Republican establishment that believed in fiscal conservatism, anti-communism, and constitutional democracy. But today’s billionaire class is pushing a radically anti-democratic agenda for America — backing Trump’s lie that the 2020 election was stolen, calling for restrictions on voting, and even questioning the value of democracy.
Peter Thiel, the billionaire tech financier who is among those leading the charge, writes “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.”
Thiel is using his fortune to squelch democracy. He donated $15 million to the successful Republican Ohio senatorial primary campaign of J.D. Vance, who alleges that the 2020 election was stolen and that Biden’s immigration policy has meant “more Democrat voters pouring into this country.” And Thiel has donated at least $10 million to the Arizona Republican primary race of Blake Masters, who also claims Trump won the 2020 election and admires Lee Kuan Yew, the authoritarian founder of modern Singapore.
The former generation of wealthy conservatives backed candidates like Barry Goldwater, who wanted to conserve American institutions. Thiel and his fellow billionaires in the anti-democracy movement don’t want to conserve much of anything — at least not anything that occurred after the 1920s, including Social Security, civil rights, and even women’s right to vote. As Thiel wrote:
The 1920s were the last decade in American history during which one could be genuinely optimistic about politics. Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women — two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians — have rendered the notion of “capitalist democracy” into an oxymoron.
Rubbish. If “capitalist democracy” is becoming an oxymoron, it’s not because of public assistance or because women got the right to vote. It’s because billionaire capitalists like Thiel are drowning democracy in giant campaign donations to authoritarian candidates who repeat Trump’s big lie.
Not incidentally, the 1920s marked the last gasp of the Gilded Age, when America’s rich ripped off so much of the nation’s wealth that the rest had to go deep into debt both to maintain their standard of living and to maintain overall demand for the goods and services the nation produced. When that debt bubble burst in 1929, we got the Great Depression.
It was also the decade when Benito Mussolini and Adolph Hitler emerged to create the worst threats to freedom and democracy the modern world had ever witnessed.
If freedom is not compatible with democracy, what is it compatible with?
On Tuesday night, Doug Mastriano, a January 6 insurrectionist and Trump-backed Big Lie conspiracy theorist, won the Republican nomination for governor of Pennsylvania (the fourth largest state in the country, and the biggest state that flipped from 2016 to 2020). Mastriano was directly involved in a scheme to overturn the 2020 election by sending an “alternate” slate of pro-Trump electors to the Electoral College — despite the fact that Trump lost Pennsylvania by more than 80,000 votes. If Mastriano wins in November, he will appoint Pennsylvania’s secretary of state, who will oversee the 2024 election results in one of the most important battleground states in the country.
Meanwhile, the major annual event of the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) — the premier convening organization of the American political right — starts today in Budapest. That’s no accident. The Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban and his ruling Fidesz party have become a prominent source of inspiration for America’s anti-democracy movement. Stephen Bannon, Trump’s former adviser, describes Orban’s agenda as that of a “Trump before Trump.”
Orban has used his opposition to immigration, LGBTQ rights, abortion, and religions other than Christianity as cover for his move toward autocracy — rigging Hungary’s election laws so his party stays in power, capturing independent agencies, controlling the judiciary, and muzzling the press. He remains on such good terms with Vladimir Putin that he’s refused to agree to Europe’s proposed embargo of Russian oil.
Tucker Carlson — Fox News’s progenitor of white replacement theory — will be speaking at CPAC and broadcasting his show from Budapest. Trump’s former chief of staff Mark Meadows will also be speaking (although he refuses to speak to the House committee investigating the January 6 assault on American democracy).
If America and the world should have learned anything from the first Gilded Age and the fascism that began growing like a cancer in the 1920s, it’s that gross inequalities of income and wealth fuel gross inequalities of political power — which in turn lead to strongmen who destroy both democracy and freedom.
Peter Thiel may define freedom as the capacity to amass extraordinary wealth without paying taxes on it, but most of us define it as living under the rule of law with rights against arbitrary authority and a voice in what’s decided.
If we want to guard what’s left of our freedom, we’ll need to meet today’s anti-democracy movement with a bold pro-democracy movement that protects the institutions of self-government both from authoritarian strongmen like Trump and his wannabes, and from big money like Peter Thiel’s.
Freedom’s just another word for nothin’ left to lose/Nothin’ ain’t worth nothin’ but it’s free
LikeLiked by 1 person
You and Bobby McGee! Well, it depends on the freedom we’re talking about. I don’t see me living in a 1930s Germany … freedom FROM is often more important than freedom TO.
LikeLike
Sardonic warning….Sardonic warning force 11
That an’t gonna happen, not since money replaced hitting folk with a club or threatening to be stabbing them with a sword as a way to win them over. There has been a transition period of a few of thousand years, and the first method still finds it devotees.
(I need to watch more cartoons and rom-coms. I’m past my safe level of Reality input)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sigh. Yes, let’s both go watch some cartoons. You can keep the rom-coms, and I’ll stick with Tom and Jerry, Scooby Doo, Bugs Bunny, etc.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lots of cartoons.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Read it too….he’s good
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, decades of experience plus an open mind have given him a pretty accurate view of events and outcomes. I trust his judgement more than most.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent post! As the saying goes,’Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it’.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you!!! Yes, that is a saying I’ve been repeating more and more of late, as parts of this nation work to erase our true history.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Wibble and commented:
If you read just one thing today, please make it this.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you so much for the re-blog!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
maybe a bold pro-democracy movement could arrange to revoke the passports of a’holes like Bannon and Carlson so they’re stuck in Budapest under the rule of Orban forever. Where is Bernie Sanders when you need him?
LikeLiked by 3 people
Oooohhhhh … I LIKE that idea!!! Too bad a few others aren’t over there with them. Bernie’s around somewhere, for he sent me an email this evening asking for a donation. 🙄
Cwtch
LikeLiked by 2 people
When will our gov’t start implementing campaign finance reforms, for the good of the republic? This just shows how much politicians care about the ppl, and who they are beholden to. A few billion here and there can influence election outcomes.
I’m starting to think that elections (for everyday folk) really don’t matter?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Though you’re not entirely wrong, I think that that’s exactly what the oligarchs want everyone to think.
LikeLiked by 3 people
My train of thought…. corporate oligarchs still control the rigged game, all the while presenting the illusion that elections are still free and fair for the masses. Problem is: cracks are starting to show, and the peons are calling out the blatant hypocrisy.
But why aren’t the politicians listening, they claim to represent the ppl right?
LikeLike
GRRRRRRRRRR
LikeLiked by 4 people
I second that motion. 🤬
LikeLiked by 3 people
Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook spent $450 billion on behalf of the Democrat Party in 2020. Billionaires influencing politics is another case of everybody does it. The Supreme Court has ruled that money is free speech. So there you have it.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Excuse me. The number should be $450 million. I teach math and I give myself an F for making an inexcusable error.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Heh heh … nobody’s perfect, my friend.
LikeLike
Hey, spaek fro youself!
LikeLiked by 2 people
OOPS … Sorry … I forgot! 🙄
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fully agree … I would like to see big money taken out of politics altogether. No corporate donations, no million dollar donations. Citizens United v FEC was one of the biggest mistakes the Supreme Court ever made and we’re paying the price in spades.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Reblogged this on Ned Hamson's Second Line View of the News.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Thanks, Ned!!!
LikeLike