Where do you go to see the absolute ugliest clothes you’ve never even dreamed of before? Apparently, it’s the “Met Gala,” an annual fundraising gala held for the benefit of the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Costume Institute in New York City. These are some of the most hideous, ostentatious outfits I’ve ever seen … they may well give me nightmares tonight!
Since 2005, the event has been held on the first Monday in May. The first year of the Met Gala, 1973, the ticket price was $100. Inflation must have hit the fashion industry hard, though, because this year the price of admission was $50,000!!! And the costs of the ‘costumes’ can run in the tens of thousands of dollars or more! One dress from last year’s gala is said to have sold for $4.8 million!!! And children are going to bed hungry at night, people are living on the street in cardboard boxes … 😡
But anyway, I thought it would be a fun venue for this week’s Saturday Surprise, so take a look at some of the best worst of the outfits exhibited last Monday at the Met Gala … hold onto your hats! In my mind, there is only one question: WHY????
I’m perversely glad I found this post Jill, what a great opportunity to indulge in severe, judgemental, socialism and condemnatory grumpiness.
No they are not being clever or outrageous or stunning. No style, no taste, nothing but self-aggrandisement on a ridiculous scale.
Hurrumph!
LikeLiked by 1 person
We are of like minds on this! And when I read about the costs involved, how much money was being thrown away on these “fashions” … I couldn’t help but feel socialist while wondering how many children could have eaten for a year with that money. I add my Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr … to your Hurrumph!
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr’ works for me 👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fascinating the way that folks with money think they need to spend it …
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ain’t it though?
LikeLike
We have a word for people like them. It starts with ‘W’ and rhymes with bankers…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh yeah! I’ve heard Roger and David both use that word before and yeah, it suite them to a ‘T’!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the entertainment Jill, so ridiculous. Do they actually take it seriously? I will have nightmares after seeing that cat!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh yes, they definitely do take it seriously, though I imagine there are many laughs as they come up with these outrageous designs! Ha ha … the cat was the only one I kind of liked!
LikeLike
Well, it was a distraction from other things…
LikeLiked by 1 person
By the way, this comment was me, but it sent before I could “log in”…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve had that happen many a time! I’m still puzzled as to why we sometimes, but not always, have to ‘log in’ when we’re already logged in to our WP account. Sigh. More of WordPress’ “improvements” I guess.
LikeLike
That’s a good way to look at it!
LikeLike
Hilarious. I actually look forward to this event every year, just to see how outrageous the outfits are. 🤣
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, it’s at least as much fun as watching grown men hit a helpless, defenseless little white ball around with a big stick! 🤣
LikeLiked by 1 person
“WHY??????????????”
Seconded. 😐
LikeLiked by 2 people
👍
LikeLike
Jill, these dresses and outfits may be art, but not something you could walk around in without getting it stepped on or tripping over. I think when you put it in the right perspective, it can be fun to watch how outlandish these things can be. Functional art, not so much. Keith
LikeLiked by 1 person
PS – By the way, watching King Charles’ coronation, the dresses were a stark contrast to the ones above. Elegant and stylish for the most part. One of the announcers reminisced about the trouble Princess Diana had with her wedding train which had great difficulty getting shoved into the bridal carriage. Seeing the MetGala gowns reminded me of this.
By the way, I once was in a wedding that required a tuxedo with tails. You could not wear the tails in the car and to be careful sitting down. These poor women didn’t stand a chance of sitting. Keith
LikeLiked by 1 person
I only watched a bit of it, but I noticed the same thing!
Ha ha … I can only imagine what a pain that would have been!
LikeLike
Yeah, it was fun to see them, each one a bit more over-the-top than the last, but I cringe when I think of how much money was spent … but then, that’s me … a realist.
LikeLike
“It’s pretty but is it art?” Rudyard Kipling
I want the red trench coat. Art for arts sake is good. It’s their money earned on their own talents and it is for charity. Ostentatious display could become an American custom. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I guess art, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder! I didn’t find anything pretty or beautiful in any of these (except maybe the kitty costume) and damn sure wouldn’t pay tens of thousands of dollars for any of them!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Look at that coat! Me thinks one is becoming jaded. What if it’s someone else’s money?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not jaded, just more in tune with the simpler things in life … like jeans and a t-shirt! Someone else’s money? Then I would donate it to homeless shelters, food kitchens, and animal welfare groups.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Epictetus would approve. Do you think artists create because they want to or do they have to for sanities sake? Spectacle is pleasing to the masses.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think that true artists create because they have to, because there is something within them that drives them to express themselves through their art. But then, there are the faux artists who, while they may have artistic talent, do not feel the compulsion to share their art apart from what it can gain them in the physical world (ie, $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gram Nash told me that each life is a work of art. Art is spirit expressed, creation, something from nothing. If it has value the creator deserves recompense.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The cat costume made me chuckle.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Me too!!! It was the only one I didn’t find disgusting!
LikeLike
Most of these, “designer gowns” can’t and should never be worn in public, and, if you can’t wear these clothes, then what would be the purposes, of the designers’ coming up with, these designs? Perhaps, it is only, for show, which feeds to the designers’ own, pride…
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree with all you say, and would only add … why do people buy these gowns at the end of the gala for sometimes enough money to feed a family for several years??? 🙄
LikeLike
It kind of makes me understand why revolutions take place.
LikeLiked by 3 people
🤣
LikeLike
My fave was easily Jared Leto
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh absolutely … without a doubt my favourite!
LikeLiked by 1 person
😎
LikeLiked by 1 person
Such a waste of money … that could have helped a lot of people.
LikeLiked by 2 people
My thoughts exactly!!! Children are going to bed hungry at night, people are living on the streets in cardboard boxes …
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙃🙃🙃
LikeLiked by 1 person
🤣🤣
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Saturday Surprise — WHY???????????? | Ned Hamson's Second Line View of the News
Because they can! But who else would want to? Total pomp– no circumstance!
LikeLiked by 3 people
On the bright side, I saw no fur or skins except a bit of leather. We have made some advances…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes the red trench coat has got me and to your well made point he wore Vinyl combat boots. lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah, vinyl. A curse upon our environment. (Is it better than the alternative? I’m not really sure.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good point!
LikeLike
I agree … all pomp … hideous pomp, but good for a few laughs, I guess!
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I did not believe that a Cause which stood for a beautiful ideal, for anarchism, for release and freedom from convention and prejudice, should demand the denial of life and joy. If I can’t dance, I don’t want to be part of your revolution.” Emma Goldman
Why can’t we dance for just this little while? If my joy dies they win.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Denial of joy”??? Perhaps I’m an anomaly, for I would find far more joy in giving that amount of money to help feed the poor or help a struggling student afford college, or pay for a child’s necessary medical care than to spend it on a piece of extravagant clothing. Perhaps we each view ‘joy’ through a different lens.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perhaps? There are only two ways to see through a telescope. Peripherals are mere distractions anyway.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Better to dance naked in the rain than one of those get-ups. Besides, I doubt those women could even dance in most of those gowns. Someghing would fall or otherwise come apart. Dancing would be a curse. 😇
LikeLiked by 2 people
If you’ve seen me dance YOU have been cursed. lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙈
LikeLike
I FULLY agree!!!!
LikeLike