Dickens’ Ghosts Return …

Remember that Dickens’ classic, A Christmas Carol?  Ol’ greedy robber baron Ebeneezer Scrooge gets a lesson from three ghosts who appear to him in a dream, and suddenly he’s a changed man, realizing that money is not the most important thing on earth.  I wonder if those three ghosts came and paid a visit to the likes of Donald Trump, Elon Musk, and all the billionaires serving in Congress today, would change them in the way Ebeneezer Scrooge was changed?

Well, John Pavlovitz let his imagination run free, and this is what he came up with …


A Republican Christmas Carol

By John Pavlovitz

22 December 2024

It’s Christmas Eve in Washington, D.C.

and from a second-floor banquet room, uproarious laughter rings out from behind frost-covered windows and into the snow-speckled sky.

Around a massive table piled to overflowing with food and wine, sit a bloated and blurry-eyed Donald Trump and Elon Musk—along with a snarling, cackling cadre of Republican lawmakers, FoxNews anchors, and celebrity evangelists. They’re regaling one another with joyous eyewitness accounts of the pair of recent uninvited and already-evicted supernatural dinner guests.

The Ghosts of Christmas Past and Present have both just been summarily dismissed, their best efforts to show those gathered, the abject terror and unfathomable suffering they’ve already visited upon the people entrusted to them— easily drowned out by the din of their jeers and slurs and cries of “fake news”.

In exaggerated gyrations around the table, they now slap their knees and wipe tears from the corners of their eyes, incredulous at the two banished specters’ naivety, in believing their dire revelations of American agony would be found remotely moving to them.

Suddenly, a wide and towering figure materializes from the ether, shrouded completely in black, save for a long skeletal hand: The Ghost of Christmas Future.

It moves swiftly toward the table and before those gathered can utter a word, they’re suddenly whisked from that room and into streets and living rooms and hospital and funeral homes and schools throughout this country.

In vivid and sickening detail, the apparition shows them the coming America their present deeds are surely birthing:
a couple with a terminally-ill daughter sells their dream home to pay the sky-scraping premiums on care for her very survival.
a migrant toddler at the border screams in scalding panic, looking for parents she cannot find and she will likely never see again.
the grieving family of a bullied Transgender college student speaks words around his casket about the incessant violence he endured, and the deadly cost of a President who banned mention of his very humanity and made him feel unworthy to live.

a Muslim teenager again sits alone in her high school cafeteria, surrounded on all sides by the stares and snickers of her peers, emboldened by parents who now conflate her faith with terrorism.
the parents of a high school student run frantically toward their son’s school, now surrounded by police, while they read his terrified texts as a shooter tries to enter his classroom.
a single father finds himself awake in the middle of the night, pushed toward homelessness and feeling helpless to take care of his children, with so few resources and no way to earn a wage to sustain them all.
a young woman wears her trauma on the inside, so desiring to speak the truth of the damage done to her by a man she once dated, but knowing that staying silent will be less painful, given what she has seen other accusers endure.

The grotesque vignettes all begin to pile onto one another in rapid succession, along with the anguished cries of hundreds of thousands of people who will soon find themselves alone, mourning, silenced, bullied, and terrorized in this future these men are constructing together.

The sounds and pictures then begin to multiply; rising and spinning into a horrible, thunderous, disorienting whirlwind around them—and then, as if deposited from a roller coaster, it all screeches to halt and they once again find themselves in the room where they began.

The ghost stares at the group gathered around the table awaiting their response, as breathless, they pause for a moment and look at one another.

“Woke idiots!”, Vivek Ramaswamy mutters, breaking the thick silence and bringing an explosion of sarcastic laughter from every corner of the room.

Seeing the vivid, supernatural vision of the suffering of the sick and the poor and the vulnerable they will be responsible for if unmoved from their current course, they are not terrified or racked with guilt—but greatly overjoyed.

“Seriously, Specter,” Elon bellows, “is this supposed to bother us? You’re gonna have to do better than that!”

“Yeah,” adds Jim Jordan, “what did you think we’re doing here?”

An inebriated Steve Bannon staggers in from the hall wearing a filthy Santa suit. “This is the whole point, you black apparition” he brags, as a smile curls across his lips. “This has been the plan all along—This is what we wanted.”

“Yeah, and wait until you see Project 2025!” Trump adds, before spitting his drink all over himself and falling from his chair.

A flood of self-congratulatory embraces breaks out around the table, and as the throng of jubilant rich men celebrates—the Ghost of Christmas Future departs, shaking his head as he realizes that what he intended for them as fearful warnings, were instead, welcomed predictions.

There would be no Christmas morning miracle.
There would be no dawn awakening of changed men and women, so long asleep in their greed and contempt, now reborn.
There would be no rewriting of sad coming days for those who they’ve disregarded.
There would be no change of fortune for so many overworked and invisible.
There would be no healing of a sick child, too tiny to be noticed.
There would be no “God bless us, every one,” spoken around a welcoming table big enough for all.

There would only be the continuing waking nightmare visited upon good people, by men and women of privilege whose souls or humanity could no longer be reached—even by the terrible vision of what they were making and the knowledge of the harm they would cause.

While outside there would be great mourning on that morning, they would go on peacefully sleeping right through it.

This was the Christmas they’d been dreaming of for their entire lives.

‘We the People’ Still Matter, Y’Know!

Buried in my morning email was one by Marc Elias that struck a chord.  Elias is the founder of Democracy Docket, a website focused on voting rights and election litigation in the United States.  He is an attorney who is a nationally recognized authority and expert in campaign finance, voting rights, redistricting law, and litigation.  I subscribe to Democracy Docket and find his views and opinions are almost always spot-on.

One thought keeps nagging at me these days, every time I read about the machinations taking place within Congress, or some inane statement made by Felon Trump, and that is … what about We the People???  It seems to me that all discussions and rhetoric coming out of Washington fail to even mention the 330 million people in this country – y’know … the ones Lincoln mentioned in his Gettysburg Address when he said, “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal” and “government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth”?  Have you heard any of the loud-mouthed politicos even mention “the people” recently?  I haven’t.

Marc Elias agrees with me and tells us that “we are on our own”, and what we must do next to remind those whose salaries we pay that we are the employers, not the slaves!!!


We Are on Our Own

By Marc Elias

22 December 2024

Each time I have sat down to write something since the election, I am bothered by this recurring phrase that I simply cannot get out of my head.

So, this week I am going to just say it out loud: we are on our own.

I realize this raises as many questions as it answers. Who are the “we?” Where, exactly, are the “we?” And what do I mean by “on our own?” Let me unpack them in order.

The “we” is the easy part. It includes all of us who care about democracy, rule of law and free and fair elections. It is not a small group.

It includes tens of millions who voted for Kamala Harris and millions more who did not. That includes millions who did not vote as well as many who voted for Trump because they feel like the government is failing them, and Trump seemed like change from the broken status quo.

The hardest part to define and know for certain is where we are. I know for certain where we are heading.

We are sliding towards an illiberal democracy. The phrase, first popularized in the 1990s, took on new urgency in the United States as major figures in Donald Trump’s orbit came to view Viktor Orbán as a leadership role model. As Bill Kristol posted, “ABC’s settlement with Trump feels like it could be an inflection point in the Orbanization of our politics.”

While illiberal democracies have elected governments, they lack the guardrails to protect individual freedoms and rights. Things like rule of law, a free press, an independent judiciary and professional civil service are viewed by those in power with hostility. The ruling leader amasses power personally, rather than institutionally, and uses it to reward friends and punish political enemies.

To be clear, the United States is not yet an illiberal democracy, but the movement towards it has accelerated in the weeks since the election. What is most disturbing is that Trump has not yet even taken power.

Our institutions are not going to save us. Only we can do that.

This brings me to the toughest part: the fact that we are on our own. Institutions that assured us they would be in the fight for democracy are already backing down. People who claimed they saw Trump clearly for what he is now have voluntarily put blinders in front of their own eyes.

There is no segment of civil society that has been untouched by this capitulation. Some in positions of great power are preemptively acting powerless. Too many with the loudest microphones are turning them down. Most disturbing, those with the greatest wealth are acting like they are the poorest and most vulnerable.

The guardrails of our democracy are not failing under violent contact. Rather they are being taken down in advance, by the very people who insisted they be entrusted to build them.

That is why I say we are on our own.

When the legacy media normalizes Trump’s most indefensible nominees at the same time its owners pay protection money, we are on our own. When businessmen fly their private jets to kiss the ring solely to protect their own companies from his deranged policies, we are on our own. When government officials, who know how dangerous he is, make excuses or resign in advance, we are on our own.

I wish I could say I have the solution, but this is a bigger problem than one person can solve. I have previously written about the need to build a new opposition grounded in winning elections and fighting Trumpism for the long term. I still believe that is a necessary part of the equation.

So too is rallying around those institutions that are standing tall — independent media, opposition political figures and nonprofit and for-profit groups and businesses willing to risk themselves to support democracy.

But that is unlikely to be enough. Right now, we must stop the exodus of people tuning out the political process altogether. Faced with the threats ahead, people want to look away. You can see it in the words people use and the excuses they make: “Maybe it won’t be that bad; don’t take him literally; MAGA isn’t competent enough to do everything they threaten.”

Not a day passes that someone doesn’t tell me that they are exhausted or, more candidly, afraid. It is okay to be tired and understandable to be afraid. Courage doesn’t come from being well rested and feeling safe. It is found in overcoming those emotions.

Our institutions are not going to save us. Only we can do that. We may be on our own, but together we can fight, and we must believe that when we fight, we will win.

♫ Christmas Eve/Sarajevo 12/24 ♫

A couple of nights ago, in a comment to one of my Christmas music posts, our friend Ali posted a link to a song I had never heard before, but when I watched the video and listened to the music, I fell in love with it!  The song is by the Trans-Siberian Orchestra (TSO) and while I have loved most of their music, this one was new to me.  Also new to me was that TSO evolved from an 80s heavy metal band named Savatage … never heard of ‘em, but that’s not surprising since I do not like heavy metal at all and avoid it like the plague!

The song was written by Paul O’Neill, Robert Kinkell, and Jon Oliva.  In an interview, O’Neill explained the story behind the music …

We heard about this cello player born in Sarajevo many years ago who left when he was fairly young to go on to become a well-respected musician, playing with various symphonies throughout Europe. Many decades later, he returned to Sarajevo as an elderly man—at the height of the Bosnian War, only to find his city in complete ruins.

I think what most broke this man’s heart was that the destruction was not done by some outside invader or natural disaster—it was done by his own people. At that time, Serbs were shelling Sarajevo every night. Rather than head for the bomb shelters like his family and neighbors, this man went to the town square, climbed onto a pile of rubble that had once been the fountain, took out his cello, and played Mozart and Beethoven as the city was bombed.

He came every night and began playing Christmas Carols from that same spot. It was just such a powerful image—a white-haired man silhouetted against the cannon fire, playing timeless melodies to both sides of the conflict amid the rubble and devastation of the city he loves. Some time later, a reporter traced him down to ask why he did this insanely stupid thing. The old man said that it was his way of proving that despite all evidence to the contrary, the spirit of humanity was still alive in that place.

The song basically wrapped itself around him. We used some of the oldest Christmas melodies we could find, like “God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen” and “Carol of the Bells” part of the medley (which is from Ukraine, near that region). The orchestra represents one side, the rock band the other, and single cello represents that single individual, that spark of hope.

The story is a slightly altered version of the real-life story of Vedran Smailović. Despite O’Neill’s descriptions of Smailović as “white-haired” and an “old man”, he was only 36 years old during his 22-day vigil. Smailović did not actually play any Mozart or Beethoven pieces, but he did play Remo Giazotto’s “Adagio in G minor” each day among the bombed ruins of Sarajevo in honor of each person killed in the bombing. He was not the only cellist who played through the siege; the Sarajevo String Quartet, which did have elderly members, were also noted for their continuous performances throughout the siege.

The song charted at #49 in the U.S. in the first weeks of January 1997 and January 1998, and nowhere else that I can see.  Nonetheless, it tugged at my heartstrings and thus I am sharing it with you today.  Thank you, Ali, for introducing me to this one!!!

The Poison Is Spreading … Another Tragedy 😢

There is a poison here in the U.S., a toxicity of the minds of millions of people that has spread rampantly over the past decade or so.  It has many names, “far right”, “maga”, and more, but the bottom line is it is fascist and racist, it favours authoritarianism, exclusion of any who are not white, straight, Christian, and male.  It has many faces, but the most notable ones are those of a felon who was just elected to the highest office in the U.S., and another who is often referred to as “the richest man in the world,” though in my book money does not necessarily equate to being rich.  But that’s a conversation for another day.  Today I want to make note of the fact that the poison to which I refer is spreading far and wide, the most recent horrendous evidence being a tragedy in Germany this week.

Yesterday, in the German town of Magdeburg, a man ploughed his car into a crowd at a Christmas market, injuring more than 200 and killing 5 as of this writing, though I believe the death toll will rise.  The killer, identified as Taleb al-Abdulmohsen, a 50-year-old medical doctor from Saudi Arabia, has lived in Germany since 2006.  Saudi officials had warned German authorities about the man at least three times, starting in 2007, but the warnings had gone unheeded.

German news outlet Der Spiegel reports that the suspect was a fan of the far-right party AfD, as well as Elon Musk and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones:

Taleb A. apparently shared the resentment of conspiracy ideologists and agitators such as the US podcaster Alex Jones or the British right-wing activist Tommy Robinson. The entrepreneur Elon Musk, who has increasingly openly expressed his sympathies for right-wing parties, was also one of his role models: “If you listen to someone like Tommy Robinson or even Elon Musk, and even if you are ignorant of the process of Islamization, you will think that they are both conspiracy theorists,” said A. in an interview. “But I can say from experience that everything Robinson says, what Musk says, what Alex Jones says, or anyone who is described by the mainstream media as a radical or right-wing extremist – they are telling the truth.”

Terrorist events like this one are likely to increase if we don’t find a way to tamp down the far-right-wing rhetoric that is spewing hatred, likely to become frequent events around the world.  How many people have to die before we realize that we’re all in this world together, that it doesn’t matter what colour someone’s skin is, who they love, or whether they share your religious beliefs – we need each other, we need to work together for the common good.  My heart breaks as I think of how many lives were affected by this tragedy – families & friends of the victims – and all because one piece of human garbage listened to the hate-filled speech of people like Elon Musk and Alex Jones.  Where will the next one happen?  When?  How many will die?  And all … for what???  For nothing.

♫ Happy Xmas (War Is Over) ♫

I’ve only played this one once, back in 2020, but it really should become part of my ‘annual redux’ Christmas tunes, for it is one with more meaning than most, rather like Christmas 1914, which I played earlier this week.  Yes, Christmas is a time for joy, but should also be a time for introspection, for remembering and caring about others. 


Most Christmas songs are cheery, evoking visions of sleigh bells, mistletoe, presents, and the like.  This one, however, is a bit different and given the chaos and angst around the world today, I think is more appropriate than the other sort to play on Christmas Eve.  This song asks us to think about those who live in fear, and collectively bring about the end of war. The call to action is the refrain “war is over, if you want it.”

John Lennon and Yoko Ono wrote this in their New York City hotel room and recorded it during the evening of October 28 and into the morning of the 29th, 1971, at the Record Plant in New York. It was released in the US for Christmas, but didn’t chart. The next year, it was released in the UK, where it did much better, charting at #4. Eventually, the song became a Christmas classic in America, but it took a while, and it only reached #42 at best.

John and Yoko spent a lot of time in the late ’60s and early ’70s working to promote peace. In 1969, they put up billboards in major cities around the world that said, “War is over! (If you want it).” Two years later this slogan became the basis for this song when Lennon decided to make a Christmas record with an anti-war message. John also claimed another inspiration for writing the song: he said he was “sick of ‘White Christmas.'”

The children’s voices are the Harlem Community Choir, featuring thirty children, most of them four to twelve years of age, who were brought in to sing on this track. They are credited on the single along with Yoko and The Plastic Ono Band.

Lennon and Ono produced this with the help of Phil Spector. Spector had worked on some of the later Beatles songs and also produced Lennon’s Instant Karma. It was not Spector’s first foray into Christmas music: he and his famous session stars (including a 17-year-old Cher) spent six weeks in the summer of 1963 putting together A Christmas Gift for You from Phil Spector, featuring artists like The Ronettes and Darlene Love. Unfortunately, the album was released on November 22, 1963, which was the same day US president John F. Kennedy was assassinated. The album sold poorly as America was focused on news of the killing.

At the beginning of the song, two whispers can be heard (not by me, of course, but perhaps you will hear them). Yoko whispers: “Happy Christmas, Kyoko” (Kyoko Chan Cox is Yoko’s daughter with Anthony Cox) and John whispers: “Happy Christmas, Julian” (John’s son with Cynthia).

John Lennon was shot and killed less than three weeks before Christmas in 1980. The song was re-released in the UK on December 20 of that year, reaching #2.

Why not “Merry Christmas” or “Merry Xmas”? In England, “Happy Christmas” is a more common seasonal greeting and helped differentiate it from the holiday standard Merry Christmas Baby. More confusing to Americans is “Father Christmas,” which is the English version of Santa Claus.

I was reminded of this song by our friend David when he sent it to me earlier this evening.  There are several versions, and I am playing two of them tonight.  The first is family-friendly and depicts normal Christmas scenes, while the second is far more graphic, depicting actual scenes of death and the results of war — so graphic, in fact, that YouTube has a disclaimer which you must click on in order to see the video, but … while it isn’t cheerful, I think it’s important … it reminds us that we in the West, despite our troubles, have been living a rather homogenized life, that we have never actually known what it’s like to be treated as ‘the enemy’, to carry our dead child wrapped in a dirty blanket.  Watch one or both … your choice.  

Happy or Merry Christmas, dear friends!

Happy Xmas (War Is Over)
John Lennon and Yoko Ono/Plastic Ono Band with the Harlem Community Choir

[Intro]
(Happy Christmas, Kyoko
Happy Christmas, Julian)

So this is Christmas
And what have you done?
Another year over
And a new one just begun
And so this is Christmas
I hope you had fun
The near and the dear ones
The old and the young

A very Merry Christmas
And a happy New Year
Let’s hope it’s a good one
Without any fear

And so this is Christmas (War is over)
For weak and for strong (If you want it)
For rich and the poor ones (War is over)
The road is so long (Now)
And so happy Christmas (War is over)
For black and for white (If you want it)
For yellow and red ones (War is over)
Let’s stop all the fight (Now)

A very Merry Christmas
And a happy New Year
Let’s hope it’s a good one
Without any fear

And so this is Christmas (War is over)
And what have we done? (If you want it)
Another year over (War is over)
And a new one just begun (Now)
And so happy Christmas (War is over)
We hope you had fun (If you want it)
The near and the dear ones (War is over)
The old and the young (Now)

A very Merry Christmas
And a happy New Year
Let’s hope it’s a good one
Without any fear

War is over, if you want it
War is over, now
Happy Christmas
Happy Christmas, Christmas
Happy Christmas, Christmas

Source: LyricFind
Songwriters: John Winston Lennon / Yoko Ono
Happy Xmas (War Is Over) lyrics © Downtown Music Publishing

Then vs Now — A Tale Of Two Speakers

Steve Schmidt is one of my favourite political analysts and I subscribe to his posts through Substack.  I don’t always have time to read all of his work, for he is prolific, but I was glad I did find time yesterday to read the one I am about to share. Schmidt takes us back on a trip through history and compares past to present …


Before there were tiny Speakers of the House, there was a giant

By Steve Schmidt

19 December 2024

(L to R): Speakers of the House Sam Rayburn, Mike Johnson

This is a story about a man named Sam.

He was known for his integrity. Early in his career, a wealthy businessman delivered a beautiful horse to his farm seeking favor. No one was looking, and no one would have ever known had he kept it. He sent the horse back. He was a man who could not be bought.

Later in his life, a very large group of his colleagues, made up of both Democrats and Republicans, threw money in a hat to buy the man many called “Mr. Sam” a new Cadillac.

They were concerned that he didn’t have a car of his own in Washington, DC. He didn’t accept it. Firstly, he wasn’t a taker, and secondly, his integrity wouldn’t allow him to accept a gift that made him appear beholden or kept.

We know Sam wasn’t a saint because he was a politician from Texas. He was a congressman first elected in 1912. His national service began the year that Titanic sank, and was a member for the congressional inquiries that followed.

The world was moving inexorably towards catastrophe — a global industrialized war, which would be called the Great War — finishing off the frivolous excess of the Edwardian age, and killing 40 million people, among them close to 117,000 Americans.

He died with his boots on. He was still serving in 1961, the year that Alan Shepard became the first American to take the first steps toward the moon.

He was a consequential man.

He was a builder and a dreamer.

America celebrated its 150th birthday in 1926. One hundred years had past since John Adams and Thomas Jefferson died within hours of one another on July 4, 1826, the 50th anniversary of independence.

He wanted to connect the country. In 1926, he led the effort to link the country with paved roads. He was the congressman responsible for the construction of Route 66. Every year of his career was “infrastructure year.”

Nearly 40 years later, he would call for the “Frost Belt and the Sun Belt to be connected.” He helped make that happen with a Republican president who shared his vision. Together, they created the Interstate Highway System. It was among the most transformational pieces of legislation in American history. It was called the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1956.

Sam had a mentor named “Cactus Jack,” and a protégé named Lyndon. He had a friend named Harry from whom he kept a secret.

Harry was a regular in the invitation-only poker game Sam held in his Speaker of the House’s private office.

Everyone wanted an invitation to the “Board of Education” meeting. It was the place to be. Being invited meant that you were “in the room where it happens.” It was the place in which deals were done over bourbon and cards. It was the literal back room, and it was a good thing.

Harry showed up for the card game on April 12, 1945, and received an urgent phone call. He returned immediately to the White House, and was met there by First Lady of the United States Eleanor Roosevelt. Mrs. Roosevelt stunned the World War I combat veteran and former US senator, who had been vice president for just 83 days. She said, “Harry, the president is dead.”

Harry Truman asked if there was anything he could do for her. She was steady. She answered, “No, Mr. President, is there anything that I can do for you?” Truman described the moment by saying, “I felt like the moon, the stars, and all of the planets had fallen on me.”

Hitler would be dead within weeks, and the war in Europe was nearly finished. Senator Truman had become nationally famous as chairman of the Truman Committee, which rooted out waste and profiteering in the war time economy. He had commanded men in combat, and was incensed by the rampant corruption of the First World War. He vowed that it would not happen on his watch.

He learned about his friend Sam’s secret after he was fully briefed on the “Manhattan Project.” It was the most closely held secret of the war.

President Roosevelt had a willing accomplice in the fight to deceive the American people and Congress about the secret weapon that would end World War II, and begin the age of mankind’s ability to choose Armageddon.

President Roosevelt knew Sam Rayburn could be trusted with life and death matters and the nation’s greatest secrets. The speaker did not disappoint. He found the money. He concealed it — even from his closest friends.

He was both a pragmatist and an idealist. He rejected the Southern Manifesto, which attacked the Supreme Court’s landmark Brown v. the Board of Education of Topeka (KS) decision. He advanced civil rights legislation alongside his protégé Lyndon Johnson, whom he helped become majority leader of the United States Senate.

The year was 1957, and they went to work. This is a snapshot of what they built — so many landmark bills — alongside a Republican president named Dwight Eisenhower from Abilene, Kansas:

  • National Interstate and Defense Highways Act
  • National Aeronautics and Space Act that established NASA
  • Federal Aviation Act of 1958 that created the FAA
  • National Defense Education Act
  • Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1960

Sam Rayburn’s record of legislative achievements also included passage of the Lend Lease Act and the Marshall Plan. He was singularly responsible for making sure that the America First caucus of fascist appeasers, isolationists and naifs didn’t end the draft in 1940, which would have been catastrophic for the US military on the edge of combat against the gravest threat ever faced by free people.

The man whom they called “Mr. Sam” was the longest-serving Speaker of the United States House of Representatives in American history.

He was a giant, and the offices he occupied and from which he served as Speaker of the House have become desecrated by the presence of the lowest, tiniest, vainest and dishonest of men. Here is what the former Speaker in Name Only (SINO) did when he saw his new name plate affixed to the door of his office:

Photo credit: AP

His replacement is as equally silly, if less vapid and goofy.

Behind a new name plate — also in name only — sits Mike Johnson, begging King Elon and “Tattoo” Vivek Ramaswamy to keep the government open, but no…

No, they will not flag, fail or falter, these brave MAGA billionaires who rule over us. Instead, they will shut down government in time for Christmas.

Shhhhh! Don’t you know? They are making America great again — again.

What a disgrace. The Speaker of the House is an honored title in America.

It is a constitutional office created directly by the US Constitution. The Speaker of the House is second in line to the presidency.

The office of Sam Rayburn should be liberated from its desecration.

The chance will come soon enough…maybe.

The hour to begin preparing for the moment has arrived. In fact, it is past due.

The dignity of a man named Sam’s office will be restored in the instant the name plate is changed. Honor will be restored to the speakership by a man named Hakeem. It’s time to get busy.

A Little Meme Break

Well, after my rant first thing this morning, I figured I should offset it with something a bit lighter this afternoon, maybe even toss in a chuckle or two.  So … since my meme stash is pretty full and since I haven’t posted any memes in over a week, today seems the perfect time.  Most carry a serious message, but I threw in a couple of others that are just for fun!


The XYZ States of America

This nation’s very name is a misnomer, a cruel joke.  The United States of America is no longer ‘United’ in any way, shape, or form.  I’ve long called for civil discourse, for listening to those with differing viewpoints and trying to find a space in the middle for compromise.  But those days are gone.  There is no middle ground, there can be no compromise, and this country must find itself a new name, perhaps something along the lines of Gotham or Plutonia … or how about just the XYZ States of America?  We are divided to the point that the only thing that can possibly reunite us is a national disaster – a nuclear event, an attack by an outside force, or some other event that decimates at least 25% of the nation and its people.  Perhaps then brains will be taken out of mothballs and used once again.

Many of us are still stunned, still scratching our heads and wondering how we got here.  John Pavlovitz summed it up well, I think …


Yes, It Is Us Vs. Them in America. That’s What Trump Supporters Voted For.

The Divided States of America. That’s who we are now.

By John Pavlovitz

18 December 2024

It’s not who we needed to be and it’s the greatest tragedy of our lifetimes that we are, but it’s an unpleasant reality that we need to be clear-headed about in these moments so that we can understand the path forward.

Throughout the postmortem of the Harris-Walz campaign, I’ve heard some familiar critiques of the Democratic Presidential ticket from many media members, left-leaning think pieces, and other Blue voters:

”They were out of touch with working Americans.”
”They didn’t acknowledge people’s financial pain.”
”They came across as elitist and out-of-touch.”

Nonsense.

That’s just simply not reality.

The entire Harris-Walz platform was erected on attention to and care for working people:
tax cuts for the middle class.
lower prescription drug costs.
financial help for first-time home buyers.
incentives for small business startups.
support for adult caregivers of elderly parents.
affordable healthcare.
lower grocery prices.
student loan debt relief.

Their platform, their proposed policies, and the presentation of those policies were all pitch-perfect. They did not err on those levels, regardless of the narratives floated by Monday morning quarterbacking pundits and politicians. The Dems offered a clear and easily understandable alternative to what was being presented across the aisle.

No, the one mistake Kamala Harris and Tim Walz did make, was that they underestimated the hearts of tens of millions of America’s people.

They expected them to respond en masse to an open-hearted campaign of hope, positivity, shared opportunity, and mutual respect.
They actually had the stupefying naivety to believe that a joyful movement of interdependent fortunes and love for one another would move the majority of this nation.
They spent three months passionately putting their chips down on the high road and the better angels, imagining that an optimistic “there is no them” message would bring the healing this nation has desperately needed since November of 2016.

Kamala Harris and Tim Walz confidently bet the house on unity—and they lost.

They lost, because 77 million Americans chose division, they ratified separation, they amen-ed exclusion; because despite their professions of a love your neighbor faith and their America First nationalistic fervor, they chose wars and walls and tribalism.

For the entire presidential campaign, while Kamala Harris unapologetically sang the hopeful refrain in, “the belief that we have so much more in common than that which separates us”, Donald Trump drew the sharp, jagged battle lines of us and them:
the immigrants are poisoning this country.
public school teachers are polluting young people’s minds.
transgender people are peddling perversion.
the media is the enemy of this nation.
blue voters are dangerous and vile people.

He turned foreigners into monsters, LGBTQ people into pedophiles; he fashioned ordinary human beings into a lawless, blood-thirsty legion of enemies and adversaries for uninformed voters to be hysterically terrified by, so that they would look at their disparate neighbors, not with compassion but contempt.

Trump’s campaign offered zero policies, no tangible ideas, no unifying aspirations, no galvanizing agenda.

He simply dispensed hatred and fear, paraded lazy stereotypes and tired caricatures— and that proved to be a winning strategy. That’s why these days are as heartbreaking for the rest of us as they are: like the Kamala Harris and Tim Walz, and like the Democratic Party, we realize unity isn’t attractive anymore.

And in the wake of an election where 77 million of our fellow Americans posture and pump their chests and fly strident middle fingers to the rest of us as if they’ve defeated us—we just feel stupid.

We feel like idiots for believing that the majority was too decent to buy Donald Trump’s cheap weaponizing of difference, his desperate vilifying of the already-marginalized, his transparent middle school scare tactics.

We watched Kamala Harris and Tim Walz articulately deliver a message of empathy and collaboration; something appealing to the best of America’s ideals, and regardless of the ways we want to analyze or spin or parse it out, that message failed. They was a shock that we will never fully recover from.

And so, yes, this nation is now comprised of the us and the them in stark, unmistakable clarity and that’s simply the tragic and sober truth.

And that’s not because we desired it at all, it’s because 77 million Americans made it absolutely clear: that’s exactly what they want and that’s what they voted for.

And so we are going to have to decide where we go from here.


Freedom of the Press — Going Once, Going Twice …

Donald Trump had a mentor, a man by the name of Roy Cohn, an unscrupulous lawyer who had been the chief counsel to the horrible Eugene McCarthy in 1953.  Mr. Cohn gave the then-young Trump quite a bit of advice, but one part of his advice is in plain view today:  sue everybody!

As new film The Apprentice premieres at the Cannes Film Festival, a look at the cultural afterlife of political hitman Roy Cohn, who was Donald Trump’s mentor in his early career – teaching him to “attack, counterattack and never apologise”.

Donald Trump has been involved in some 5,000+ lawsuits (I’ve lost count), so it’s obvious that Mr. Cohn’s advice found its mark.  But now, his latest run of lawsuits might well put an end to the 1st Amendment right to “freedom of the press”, and it might well cause problems for those of us who write blogs about political issues.  Here’s the latest from Reuters …


Trump sues Des Moines Register, vows to pursue more defamation claims

By Helen Coster and Jack Queen

17 December 2024

NEW YORK, Dec 17 (Reuters) – President-elect Donald Trump has filed a lawsuit against the Des Moines Register newspaper and its top pollster, court documents showed, the day after he stepped up his legal threats against news outlets and said he would also consider suing social media influencers and others for defamation.  [emphasis and colour added by Filosofa]

The lawsuit filed Monday night in Polk County seeks “accountability for brazen election interference committed by” the newspaper and pollster J. Ann Selzer over its poll published on Nov. 2. That poll showed Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris leading Trump by 13 percentage points in Iowa.

“Selzer’s polling ‘miss’ was not an astonishing coincidence—it was intentional,” the lawsuit said. “As President Trump observed: ‘She knew exactly what she was doing.'”

The lawsuit seeks unspecified damages and an order barring the Des Moines Register from engaging in “ongoing deceptive and misleading acts and practices” related to polling.

Gannett, parent company of the Des Moines Register, is also named in the suit. A Gannett representative said the organization stands by its reporting and believes the suit is without merit.

In his remarks to reporters on Monday, Trump threatened to sue the Des Moines Register over the poll.

“In my opinion, it was fraud and it was election interference,” Trump said.

“It costs a lot of money to do it, but we have to straighten out the press,” Trump also told reporters.

Some legal experts say Trump’s comments and legal actions risk chilling news coverage of the incoming administration even if legal protections for journalists are for now robust.

“There is some serious concern that the erosion of legal protections could lead to less aggressive news coverage,” said Syracuse University communications professor Roy Gutterman.

He pointed to the ABC settlement as a possible example of a news organization fearing retribution from the Trump administration, noting that the high cost of litigation could have also influenced the network’s decision.

On Dec. 14, Walt Disney-owned ABC News agreed to give $15 million to Trump’s presidential library to settle a lawsuit over comments that anchor George Stephanopoulos made on air.

The comments involved the civil cases brought against Trump by writer E. Jean Carroll, who accused Trump of sexually assaulting her at a New York department store in the 1990s.

Stephanopoulos said Trump was found liable for rape, but a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse. New York law distinguishes the two offenses.

Trump is appealing the jury verdict in that case and a judge’s ruling in a related lawsuit brought by Carroll.

An ABC News spokesperson said in a statement that the network was pleased that the parties reached an agreement to dismiss the lawsuit.

As part of the settlement, ABC agreed to publish an editor’s note stating that the network and Stephanopoulos “regret statements regarding President Donald J. Trump” made during the interview in question.

On Monday Trump also mentioned his lawsuit against CBS News over an interview with Harris that aired on its “60 Minutes” news program in October. The lawsuit, which seeks $1 billion in damages, claimed that the interview had been deceptively edited.

CBS has said the suit is “completely without merit” and has asked a judge to dismiss the case.

Trump claimed on Monday that “60 Minutes” participated in ”fraud and election interference.”

TARGETING LEGAL PROTECTIONS FOR JOURNALISTS

Any lawsuits by Trump would still face steep hurdles in court because U.S. law has some of the strongest protections in the world for news coverage of public figures.

Longstanding legal precedent holds that public figures must prove defendants knew or strongly suspected something was false but said it anyway, a standard known as “actual malice” that is notoriously difficult to prove in court.

Trump has said this legal standard should be changed, and some U.S. Supreme Court justices have expressed willingness to reexamine the precedent.

“The standard remains a strong one, the strongest in the western world,” said Boston School of Law professor Jeffrey Pyle.

Even if lawsuits by Trump were to fail, they could create headaches for news organizations by publicly revealing potentially embarrassing internal communications and exposing journalists and executives to depositions.

In the ABC lawsuit, some legal experts said the network could have prevailed because Stephanopoulos’ comments appeared to be an innocent mistake and not the type of reckless disregard that Trump would have to prove.

A judge denied ABC’s motion to dismiss the case in July, rejecting the network’s claim that it was broadly protected under Florida laws shielding news organizations from liability for accurate reporting on information received from government officials.

That order only concerned several initial legal questions and did not mean Trump would have ultimately won.

♫ Christmas 1914 ♫ (Annual Redux)

This is a song I play every year around this time, and it never fails to bring a tear to my eyes.  This year, with the Russian war against Ukraine, Netanyahu’s war on the people of Gaza, the political turmoil here in the U.S. but also around the globe, I think … why can’t we all just stop for a few days, what has changed since 1914?  More than a century has passed since the Christmas Truce of 1914, but has anything really changed?  At any rate, to me, this is the ultimate holiday song.


On December 7, 1914, Pope Benedict XV suggested a temporary hiatus of the war for the celebration of Christmas. The warring countries refused to create any official cease-fire, but on Christmas the soldiers in the trenches declared their own unofficial truce.

Starting on Christmas Eve, many German and British troops fighting in World War I sang Christmas carols to each other across the lines, and at certain points the Allied soldiers even heard brass bands joining the Germans in their joyous singing.

At the first light of dawn on Christmas Day, some German soldiers emerged from their trenches and approached the Allied lines across no-man’s-land, calling out “Merry Christmas” in their enemies’ native tongues. At first, the Allied soldiers feared it was a trick, but seeing the Germans unarmed they climbed out of their trenches and shook hands with the enemy soldiers. The men exchanged presents of cigarettes and plum puddings and sang carols and songs. Some Germans lit Christmas trees around their trenches, and there was even a documented case of soldiers from opposing sides playing a good-natured game of soccer. German Lieutenant Kurt Zehmisch recalled …

“How marvelously wonderful, yet how strange it was. The English officers felt the same way about it. Thus Christmas, the celebration of Love, managed to bring mortal enemies together as friends for a time.”

The so-called Christmas Truce of 1914 came only five months after the outbreak of war in Europe and was one of the last examples of the outdated notion of chivalry between enemies in warfare. It was never repeated—future attempts at holiday ceasefires were quashed by officers’ threats of disciplinary action—but it served as heartening proof, however brief, that beneath the brutal clash of weapons, the soldiers’ essential humanity endured.

CHRISTMAS 1914
Mike Harding

Christmas Eve in 1914
Stars were burning, burning bright
And all along the Western Front
Guns were lying still and quiet.
Men lay dozing in the trenches,
In the cold and in the dark,
And far away behind the lines
A village dog began to bark.

Some lay thinking of their families,
Some sang songs while others were quiet
Rolling fags and playing brag
To while away that Christmas night.
But as they watched the German trenches
Something moved in No Man’s Land
And through the dark came a soldier
Carrying a white flag in his hand.

Then from both sides men came running,
Crossing into No Man’s Land,
Through the barbed-wire, mud and shell holes,
Shyly stood there shaking hands.
Fritz brought out cigars and brandy,
Tommy brought corned beef and fags,
Stood there talking, singing, laughing,
As the moon shone on No Man’s Land.

Christmas Day we all played football
In the mud of No Man’s Land;
Tommy brought some Christmas pudding,
Fritz brought out a German band.
When they beat us at football
We shared out all the grub and drink
And Fritz showed me a faded photo
Of a dark-haired girl back in Berlin.

For four days after no one fired,
Not one shot disturbed the night,
For old Fritz and Tommy Atkins
Both had lost the will to fight.
So they withdrew us from the trenches,
Sent us far behind the lines,
Sent fresh troops to take our places
And told the guns “Prepare to fire”.

And next night in 1914
Flares were burning, burning bright;
The message came along the trenches
Over the top we’re going tonight.
And the men stood waiting in the trenches,
Looking out across our football park,
And all along the Western Front
The Christmas guns began to bark.