Hate Talk

“These are the times that try men’s [and women’s] souls”, said Thomas Paine on 23 December 1776. What makes the times today so trying to our souls is, of course, the government that no longer represents the people, but even more disturbing is the way the head of said government is pitting us against each other. Our friend Hugh has written a piece that is well worth reading and thinking about. Are we falling for the rhetoric coming out of Washington to the extent that we are sacrificing our future? Thank you, Hugh, for your thoughtful and thought-provoking post.

hughcurtler

It has always been so: using emotive language to describe those people we detest reduces them to things. Such is the case with people we don’t happen to like — or want to kill in violent confrontations called “war.” Not long ago the Japanese were called “Japs,” and the Germans were called “Krauts.” We devise hateful names to describe those we hate and want to kill in the name of God and all that is good. It seems to work: it reduces human beings, as noted, to things to be dispensed with.

We now find ourselves living in a society in which our feckless leader has labelled his enemies in order to generate hatred of those things or people he has determined are his enemies — and therefore the enemies of us all. Thus are the Democrats now called “the party of crime. . .  too extreme and dangerous to…

View original post 537 more words

Albright Speaks — We Should Listen

Madeleine Albright served as Secretary of State for four years under President Bill Clinton.  Though I have not always agreed with her positions, I have tremendous respect for her knowledge and understanding.  Today, Ms. Albright published an OpEd in the New York Times that I find astute, timely, and chillingly prescient.  Agree or don’t agree, but I think this is something each of us needs to read and ponder.

Will We Stop Trump Before It’s Too Late?

By Madeleine Albright — April 6, 2018

On April 28, 1945 — 73 years ago — Italians hung the corpse of their former dictator Benito Mussolini upside down next to a gas station in Milan. Two days later, Adolf Hitler committed suicide in his bunker beneath the streets of war-ravaged Berlin. Fascism, it appeared, was dead.

To guard against a recurrence, the survivors of war and the Holocaust joined forces to create the United Nations, forge global financial institutions and — through the Universal Declaration of Human Rights — strengthen the rule of law. In 1989, the Berlin Wall came down and the honor roll of elected governments swelled not only in Central Europe, but also Latin America, Africa and Asia. Almost everywhere, it seemed, dictators were out and democrats were in. Freedom was ascendant.

Today, we are in a new era, testing whether the democratic banner can remain aloft amid terrorism, sectarian conflicts, vulnerable borders, rogue social media and the cynical schemes of ambitious men. The answer is not self-evident. We may be encouraged that most people in most countries still want to live freely and in peace, but there is no ignoring the storm clouds that have gathered. In fact, fascism — and the tendencies that lead toward fascism — pose a more serious threat now than at any time since the end of World War II.

Warning signs include the relentless grab for more authority by governing parties in Hungary, the Philippines, Poland and Turkey — all United States allies. The raw anger that feeds fascism is evident across the Atlantic in the growth of nativist movements opposed to the idea of a united Europe, including in Germany, where the right-wing Alternative für Deutschland has emerged as the principal opposition party. The danger of despotism is on display in the Russia of Vladimir Putin — invader of Ukraine, meddler in foreign democracies, accused political assassin, brazen liar and proud son of the K.G.B. Putin has just been re-elected to a new six-year term, while in Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, a ruthless ideologue, is poised to triumph in sham balloting next month. In China, Xi Jinping has persuaded a docile National People’s Congress to lift the constitutional limit on his tenure in power.

Around the Mediterranean, the once bright promise of the Arab Spring has been betrayed by autocratic leaders, such as Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt (also just re-elected), who use security to justify the jailing of reporters and political opponents. Thanks to allies in Moscow and Tehran, the tyrant Bashar al-Assad retains his stranglehold over much of Syria. In Africa, the presidents who serve longest are often the most corrupt, multiplying the harm they inflict with each passing year. Meanwhile, the possibility that fascism will be accorded a fresh chance to strut around the world stage is enhanced by the volatile presidency of Donald Trump.

If freedom is to prevail over the many challenges to it, American leadership is urgently required. This was among the indelible lessons of the 20th century. But by what he has said, done and failed to do, Mr. Trump has steadily diminished America’s positive clout in global councils.

Instead of mobilizing international coalitions to take on world problems, he touts the doctrine of “every nation for itself” and has led America into isolated positions on trade, climate change and Middle East peace. Instead of engaging in creative diplomacy, he has insulted United States neighbors and allies, walked away from key international agreements, mocked multilateral organizations and stripped the State Department of its resources and role. Instead of standing up for the values of a free society, Mr. Trump, with his oft-vented scorn for democracy’s building blocks, has strengthened the hands of dictators. No longer need they fear United States criticism regarding human rights or civil liberties. On the contrary, they can and do point to Mr. Trump’s own words to justify their repressive actions.

At one time or another, Mr. Trump has attacked the judiciary, ridiculed the media, defended torture, condoned police brutality, urged supporters to rough up hecklers and — jokingly or not — equated mere policy disagreements with treason. He tried to undermine faith in America’s electoral process through a bogus advisory commission on voter integrity. He routinely vilifies federal law enforcement institutions. He libels immigrants and the countries from which they come. His words are so often at odds with the truth that they can appear ignorant, yet are in fact calculated to exacerbate religious, social and racial divisions. Overseas, rather than stand up to bullies, Mr. Trump appears to like bullies, and they are delighted to have him represent the American brand. If one were to draft a script chronicling fascism’s resurrection, the abdication of America’s moral leadership would make a credible first scene.

Equally alarming is the chance that Mr. Trump will set in motion events that neither he nor anyone else can control. His policy toward North Korea changes by the day and might quickly return to saber-rattling should Pyongyang prove stubborn before or during talks. His threat to withdraw from the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement could unravel a pact that has made the world safer and could undermine America’s reputation for trustworthiness at a critical moment. His support of protectionist tariffs invites retaliation from major trading partners — creating unnecessary conflicts and putting at risk millions of export-dependent jobs. The recent purge of his national security team raises new questions about the quality of advice he will receive. John Bolton starts work in the White House on Monday.

What is to be done? First, defend the truth. A free press, for example, is not the enemy of the American people; it is the protector of the American people. Second, we must reinforce the principle that no one, not even the president, is above the law. Third, we should each do our part to energize the democratic process by registering new voters, listening respectfully to those with whom we disagree, knocking on doors for favored candidates, and ignoring the cynical counsel: “There’s nothing to be done.”

I’m 80 years old, but I can still be inspired when I see young people coming together to demand the right to study without having to wear a flak jacket.

We should also reflect on the definition of greatness. Can a nation merit that label by aligning itself with dictators and autocrats, ignoring human rights, declaring open season on the environment, and disdaining the use of diplomacy at a time when virtually every serious problem requires international cooperation?

To me, greatness goes a little deeper than how much marble we put in our hotel lobbies and whether we have a Soviet-style military parade. America at its best is a place where people from a multitude of backgrounds work together to safeguard the rights and enrich the lives of all. That’s the example we have always aspired to set and the model people around the world hunger to see. And no politician, not even one in the Oval Office, should be allowed to tarnish that dream.

One More Step Back Into Darkness …

You know how I sometimes say that a headline made me jaw drop?  This headline sent a very cold chill down my spine, and not in a good sort of way:

CDC gets list of forbidden words: Fetus, transgender, diversity

“The Trump administration is prohibiting officials at the nation’s top public health agency from using a list of seven words or phrases — including “fetus” and “transgender” — in official documents being prepared for next year’s budget.

Policy analysts at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta were told of the list of forbidden terms at a meeting Thursday with senior CDC officials who oversee the budget, according to an analyst who took part in the 90-minute briefing. The forbidden terms are “vulnerable,” “entitlement,” “diversity,” “transgender,” “fetus,” “evidence-based” and “science-based.”The Washington Post, 15 December 2017  

Vulnerable?  They are not allowed to use the word “vulnerable”???  Or fetus?  Diversity?  This … this … takes my breath and leaves me without words.  We started down this path on 20 January, and I began predicting this then, began noting Orwell’s 1984 in a few posts on this blog.  But even I did not see such blatant censorship happening this quickly.

“Censorship was rampant throughout Nazi Germany. Censorship ensured that Germans could only see what the Nazi hierarchy wanted people to see, hear what they wanted them to hear and read only what the Nazis deemed acceptable.”History Learning Site /

To be sure, this is not the first incidence where Trump & Co have censored certain words from federal agencies.  Remember back in August when the U.S. Department of Energy requested that scientists no longer use the terms ‘climate change’ or ‘global warming’ in their research?  Or in January, almost immediately following his inauguration, when the White House removed all mention of climate change from its official website?

“The chief function of propaganda is to convince the masses, who slowness of understanding needs to be given time in order that they may absorb information; and only constant repetition will finally succeed in imprinting an idea on their mind………the slogan must of course be illustrated in many ways and from several angles, but in the end one must always return to the assertion of the same formula. The one will be rewarded by the surprising and almost incredible results that such a personal policy secures.” – Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf

And do you remember back in October when Trump decided to  withdraw from the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)? The mandate of UNESCO is to promote “the free flow of ideas by word and image [and] to foster free, independent, and pluralistic media in print, broadcast and online”.  The U.S. withdrawal is seen as making the world less safe for journalists, according to a joint statement by the Committee to Protect Journalists, and Reporters Without Borders.

And just this week, the repeal of not only net neutrality, which enforced internet equality, gave equal opportunity to websites large and small, and enabled us to search the web unfettered.  Now, our choices will be censored, not necessarily by government, but by the largest and wealthiest corporations around the globe.

Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) was a prominent Protestant pastor who emerged as an outspoken public foe of Adolf Hitler and spent the last seven years of Nazi rule in concentration camps. Niemöller is perhaps best remembered for the quotation:

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—

Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

Bertolt Brecht was a German theatre practitioner, playwright, and poet who wrote the following, which was banned in Hitler’s Germany:

“There was once a nanny-goat who said,
In my cradle someone sang to me:
“A strong man is coming.
He will set you free!”

The ox looked at her askance.
Then turning to the pig
He said,
“That will be the butcher.”

Bertolt Brecht

Let us not be silent, friends.  Let us speak for our right to hear the truth. We cannot allow the government to turn everything we see, read or hear into ‘newspeak’, or ‘alternative language’.  Remember The Washington Post’s new slogan:  Democracy Dies In Darkness.

A Tale Of Trump And The Boy Scouts

The crowd at the latest Trump rally was different from other crowds at previous rallies.  They were children.  Children who ranged in age from 7 to 18.  They were Boy Scouts who belong to an organization that promotes the values of good citizenship and service to others in the community.  Their oath is:

“On my honor, I will do my best. To do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law; To help other people at all times; To keep myself physically strong, mentally awake and morally straight.”

For 80 years, American presidents have been speaking to the National Scout Jamboree, a gathering of tens of thousands of youngsters from around the world eager to absorb the ideas of service, citizenship and global diplomacy. In keeping with the Scouts’ traditions, all eight presidents have stayed far, far away from partisan politics. But as we all know, Trump prides himself on not being politically correct, on not showing respect for anyone, and yesterday was no exception.  Apparently Donald Trump forgot where he was and to whom he was speaking, for his speech to the 2017 Boy Scout Jamboree resembled nothing more than a campaign rally.

A few snippets:

  • “Tonight, we put aside all of the policy fights in Washington, D.C. — you’ve been hearing about with the fake news and all of that. I said, who the hell wants to speak about politics when I’m in front of the Boy Scouts? Right? ” Remember this one …

  • “You know, I go to Washington and I see all these politicians, and I see the swamp. And it’s not a good place. In fact today I said we ought to change it from the word swamp to the word cesspool or, perhaps, to the word sewer. But it’s not good. Not good.”  What a way to instill respect for government, huh?

  • “Secretary Tom Price is also here. Today Dr. Price still lives the Scout Oath, helping to keep millions of Americans strong and healthy as our Secretary of Health and Human Services. And he’s doing a great job. And hopefully, he’s going to get the votes tomorrow to start our path toward killing this horrible thing known as Obamacare that’s really hurting us, folks. He better get them. He better get them. Oh, he better — otherwise, I’ll say, Tom, you’re fired. I’ll get somebody. He better get Senator Capito to vote for it. You got to get the other senators to vote for it. It’s time. After seven years of saying repeal and replace Obamacare, we have a chance to now do it. They better do it.” Remember that these are children he is addressing, some as young as seven!

  • “As the Scout Law says: “A Scout is trustworthy, loyal” — we could use some more loyalty, I will tell you that.”  His definition of loyalty may differ somewhat from the one used by the boy scouts.

  • “By the way, what do you think the chances are that this incredible, massive crowd, record-setting is going to be shown on television tonight? One percent or zero? The fake media will say: President Trump — and you know what this is — President Trump spoke before a small crowd of Boy Scouts today. That’s some — that is some crowd. Fake media. Fake news.”

  • “Now with that, I have to tell you our economy is doing great. Our stock market has picked up — since the election November 8th. Do we remember that date? Was that a beautiful date?  What a date. Do you remember that famous night on television, November 8th, where they said — these dishonest people — where they said there is no path to victory for Donald Trump?” Again, remember the age group … did you care about the stock market when you were 10 years old?

  • “The polls — that’s also fake news. They’re fake polls. But the polls are saying — but we won Wisconsin. So I have to tell you what we did, in all fairness, is an unbelievable tribute to you and all of the other millions and millions of people that came out and voted for Make America Great Again.”

  • “And by the way, do you see the billions and billions and billions of additional money that we’re putting back into our military? Billions of dollars. New planes, new ships, great equipment for our people that are so great to us.” By all means, Donnie, let’s encourage them to put warmongering above feeding the poor.

  • “And by the way, under the Trump administration, you’ll be saying, merry Christmas again when you go shopping. Believe me. Merry Christmas. They’ve been downplaying that little, beautiful phrase. You’re going to be saying, merry Christmas again, folks.” Guess it never occurred to him that some of these kids might be from Jewish or Muslim families???

  • “We’ll be back.” Doubtful.

In addition to the above, he told a long, pointless story about the real-estate developer William Levitt and alluded to “interesting” activities he engaged in on his yacht. The story is too wordy to repeat here, but you can read the transcript of his speech if you wish.

For some, it was reminiscent of a Hitler Youth rally.

At the very least, it was vile and highly inappropriate.  If I had a son who had been there, I would be incensed, as I imagine many parents were. One mother wrote, “Done with scouts after you felt the need to have my kid listen to a liar stroke his ego on our time.” Interestingly, a post on the Jamboree’s blog had warned troops to be “courteous” and refrain from chanting phrases like “lock her up”.  Apparently somebody realized in advance how Trump was likely to behave.  Even so, that did not prevent the audience from applauding Trump’s partisan attacks and even booing when he mentioned Hillary Clinton. Indoctrination, anyone?

Franklin Delano Roosevelt used the occasion to talk about good citizenship. Harry S. Truman extolled fellowship: “When you work and live together, and exchange ideas around the campfire, you get to know what the other fellow is like,” he said.
President Dwight D. Eisenhower invoked the “bonds of common purpose and common ideals.” And President George H.W. Bush spoke of “serving others.” Trump destroyed that norm. His speech was widely and swiftly condemned by former Scouts.

“As a Scout leader, my stomach is in knots about what Trump did today. If you haven’t watched it yet, don’t. It’s downright icky.” – Chris Murphy, Connecticut

“This is nauseating. I’m an Eagle Scout and a former scoutmaster. The BSA was never partisan.” – Dan Kennedy

Time and Distance … Lessons From History

history

A comment on a Facebook post Saturday night greatly disturbed me and set my mind on a path, trying to understand how or why anybody in their right mind would make such a comment.  The original post was by my friend A, and it was a relatively innocuous political post.  Nothing to inspire hateful comments, not really anything particularly controversial.  But one of A’s friends who I do not personally know, responded with the following:

“Everyone has their opinions, yes I voted for him but I would have voted for Hitler himself before I would EVER have voted for Hillary! I don’t debate politics nor do I disrespect anyone that did… This is simply my opinion.”

I was so incredulous that I had to read and re-read the comment several times to be sure I was seeing what I thought I was seeing.  Surely NOBODY would EVER say such a thing!  But she did. I responded with relative calm, telling her that her remark was exceedingly inappropriate and adding a suggestion that she invest in a history book or two.

Within an hour or so, the comment and with it my response were removed, so either she realized the error of her ways, or was just angry and removed her comment.  I neither know nor particularly care which.  But I did a lot of thinking, wondering why she made that comment in such a flippant, off-hand manner.

I have always heard that history is cyclic, and perhaps it is so.  I was born a few short years after the end of World War II.  My grandfather had fought in World War I.  My father and uncles had fought in World War II. I grew up hearing of the horrors wrought on the world by Adolph Hitler, thus the war and the Holocaust were as real to me as if I had been there in person.  I vividly remember the story my father told of going to sleep in a building in Dunkirk and waking up a few hours later … in the only corner that remained of the building.  Stories of brutality, of man’s inhumanity to man.  It was real to me, and by the time I was about five, I hated Hitler with a burning passion.

history-7When I had children of my own, I spoke of these things.  My now-grown children understand what Hitler did, despise him for what he did, but with a few degrees less passion than I, because of distance and time.  I liken it to parents trying to teach a child a valuable lesson that they, themselves learned.  More often than not, the child cannot learn from the parent’s mistakes, but must go out and make his own in order to fully understand the lesson.  For twelve years I taught history to my homeschooled granddaughter, and I suppose my passion on the subject got through, because she was almost as offended as I when she saw the comment that began this post.  But other young people I know are pitifully lacking in even understanding quite what Hitler did that was so bad, and they really have no idea how he rose to power, the set of circumstances that enabled him to do so.  Is this a failure on the part of our schools, or is it that to these young people it is such ancient history that they do not feel a connection, and therefore lack interest?

If this line of thinking is correct, and I have no idea whether or not it is, then are we doomed to make the same mistakes … is history destined to repeat itself? Perhaps we are enough generations removed from the horrors of the Nazis and the Third Reich that it is much diminished in the minds of those who are in what is now called the millennial generation. How, then, will people see Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini and others in another 100 years?  Will the memory, the lessons, be so diluted in another century that Hitler is seen as nothing much more than “just another bad leader”?

history-6And what does this say about us as humans?  Are we so self-focused that events not directly affecting us are irrelevant?  A fellow-blogger recently wrote a post where she suggests that we in the U.S. have been blind to the human tragedies in Syria, Aleppo, Sudan, Yemen, and many others.  And she is right … we have been, for the most part. Why?  Because they do not directly affect us?  Just as the past horrors that affected our ancestors no longer affect us.  I am reminded of the legendary feud between the Hatfields and the McCoys that transcended multiple generations until finally nobody remembered what the original feud was about.

Where am I going with this?  I have no idea.  The comment that the person ‘would have voted for Hitler’ just sent my mind tumbling around trying to figure out how anybody could think it is okay to say such a thing, and what you have just read is the result of those mind acrobatics.  Just something to think about.

Then … and Now

“The receptivity of the great masses is very limited, their intelligence is small, but their power of forgetting is enormous. In consequence of these facts, all effective propaganda must be limited to a very few points and must harp on these slogans until the last member of the public understands what you want him to understand by your slogan.” – Adolph Hitler, Mein Kampf, 1926

It was on this day, 30 January in 1933 that Adolph Hitler came to power in Germany.  Eighty-four years ago today was the start of what would become an empire of evil.

Control of newspapers was put into the hands of Joseph Goebbels, the head of the Ministry of Popular Enlightenment and Propaganda. Goebbels set up a department within the ministry that dealt solely with newspapers. The newspapers had to spread the same message as everything else – Gleischaltung – the coordination of the whole of Nazi German society so that it acted and thought the same. Therefore, people could only read the news as it was presented to them by the government. (Keep in mind that this was before the age of television and the internet, so radio and newspapers were the primary venues for information)

The official newspaper of the Third Reich was the ‘Vőlkischer Beobachter’, which translated as ‘Racial Observer’. It was anti-Semite, anti-Communist, anti-liberal and completely fawning towards Hitler. In addition, Joseph Goebbels had his own newspaper, ‘Der Angriff’, translated as ‘The Assault’, which also supported Hitler and National Socialism and pushed Nazi ideas.

At its peak, Goebbels supervised more than 3,600 newspapers and hundreds of magazines. He met the editors of the Berlin newspapers each morning and told them what could be printed and what could not.

Fast forward 84 years and half a globe away:

trump-hitlerTrump, the head of the governing administration in the U.S., has selected as his chief advisor Steve Bannon, a self-professed white supremacist who, until recently, headed the right-wing, white supremacist media outlet, Breitbart. It is to be believed he still has much control over the organization, an organization that is anti-LGBT, racist, sexist, pro-Nazi, anti-immigrant, and fawns entirely over Trump.  Here is what Mr. Bannon had to say to the press last weekend:

“The media should be embarrassed and humiliated and keep its mouth shut and just listen for a while. I want you to quote this. The media here is the opposition party. They don’t understand this country. They still do not understand why Donald Trump is the president of the United States.”

Sources inside the White House say that Bannon wrote a portion of Trump’s inaugural speech and has written most, if not all of his disastrous ‘executive orders’ In addition to Breitbart being a mouthpiece for Trump, Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, owns and publishes the New York Observer.

bannon-goebbels

Goebbels  & Bannon

In an interview last August, Bannon was quoted as saying, “I’m a Leninist. Lenin wanted to destroy the state, and that’s my goal too. I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of today’s establishment.” More recently he commented on two news outlets: “National Review and The Weekly Standard are both left-wing magazines, and I want to destroy them also. No one reads them or cares what they say.”

And this: “I’m the guy pushing a trillion-dollar infrastructure plan. With negative interest rates throughout the world, it’s the greatest opportunity to rebuild everything. Ship yards, iron works, get them all jacked up. We’re just going to throw it up against the wall and see if it sticks. It will be as exciting as the 1930s … “ As exciting as the 1930s .. the 1930s when Hitler came to power and the world would never be quite the same again.

Last October, the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) issued this warning: “[Donald] Trump has insulted and vilified the press and has made his opposition to the media a centerpiece of his campaign. A Trump presidency would represent a threat to press freedom in the United States.”

Throughout his campaign, Trump has vilified the press, calling them liars, disgusting, and scum.  What is more frightening, however, is that some of his supporters took this as a declaration of “open season” on journalists.  A few of the more horrific examples:

  • Julia Ioffe wrote an article for GQ Magazine that was critical of Trump’s current wife, Melania. Within days Ms. Ioffe had received a barrage of anti-Semitic mail and a number of death threats.
  • Kurt Eichenwald, noted author and writer for Newsweek who has frequently spoken of his epilepsy, received a tweet from a Trump supporter that triggered a seizure. Yes, folks that CAN happen … I had a cousin who had epilepsy and even the flashing lights on certain television programs would trigger a seizure.
  • At his rallies, his supporters were so vociferous, screaming ‘boos’ and using obscene gestures, that in several instances, journalists had to be escorted by police in riot gear.
A supporter gestures at the media as Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump addresses supporters during a campaign rally for Republican Presidential Donald Trump in Cincinnati

One of Trump’s sheeples

Yes indeed, some of Trump’s supporters are a really class act, aren’t they?  His fan base is more of a problem than just hate-mail, vitriol and death threats, however.  They lend him legitimacy in his fight against the press and others.  They feed his ego.  Trump could never do to our press what Hitler did to Germany’s, right?  I mean, we have laws, we have the Constitution, the 1st amendment.  But … if the majority in Congress support him almost without reservation, and if he nominates a like-thinking Supreme Court Justice to fill the seat left vacant by the death of Antonin Scalia …. who stops him?  The Constitution, you say.  But who interprets the Constitution?  The Supreme Court. Who enacts the laws of the land?  Congress.

Already, Trump has shown that he is intent on bypassing the system for making laws, and simply imposing his will on the country via a series of ‘executive orders’.  Already he considers that the press is his enemy, that there is a war on between himself and the press.  Already he has threatened to sue any media organization that fails to play nice with him.  Already he has used such smokescreen tactics as those I have mentioned before:  red herrings, spin, and that can o’ worms – alternative facts.  Already Bannon is considering relocating the White House press corps outside the White House, effectively limiting their informational flow.  Already the press is being spoon-fed what the administration wants it to know, with other things almost certainly taking place behind the scenes.

Many, even those who are not Trump supporters, say I am seeing monsters in the closet or jumping at shadows when I make comparisons between Hitler and Trump, Goebbels and Bannon, and the situation in Germany in the 1930s with the situation in the U.S. in 2017.  I don’t think I am, but even if I am stretching my imagination, I still see enough similarities to send a chill down my spine as I write this post.  I hope I am wrong, but even if I am, I would rather be ever-vigilant and find it was an unnecessary precaution than fail to take the precaution and find out I was right.  This is one time there would be no joy in having to say, “I told you so”.

Thoughts On “What next?”

“Once they succeeded in ending democracy and turning Germany into a one-party dictatorship, the Nazis orchestrated a massive propaganda campaign to win the loyalty and cooperation of Germans. The Nazi Propaganda Ministry, directed by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, took control of all forms of communication in Germany: newspapers, magazines, books, public meetings, and rallies, art, music, movies, and radio. Viewpoints in any way threatening to Nazi beliefs or to the regime were censored or eliminated from all media.”United States Holocaust Memorial Museum 

Under Trump, “The Corporation for Public Broadcasting would be privatized, while the National Endowment for the Arts and National Endowment for the Humanities would be eliminated entirely.” – Alexander Bolton, The Hill, 19 January 2017

“Speaking from the lobby of CIA headquarters in Langley, before a wall of stars honoring intelligence officers who died in service, Trump declared, “I have a running war with the media. They are among the most dishonest human beings on earth, right?” – Donald Trump speaking at Central Intelligence Agency headquarters, Saturday, 21 January 2017

Robert B. Reich is the chancellor’s professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley and former secretary of labor under the Clinton administration. Time Magazine named him one of the 10 most effective Cabinet secretaries of the 20th century. He recently wrote an article titled, “Trump’s Seven Techniques to Control the Media: Tyrants always try to suppress a free press; here’s Trump’s playbook.” The Seven Techniques are:

  • Berate the media
  • Blacklist critical media
  • Turn the public against the media
  • Condemn satirical or critical comments
  • Threaten the media directly
  • Limit media access
  • Bypass the media and communicate with the public directly

Historically, these seven techniques have been used by demagogues to erode the freedom and independence of the press. For the full article, click here   I think we can all agree that Trump has done each of the seven listed here.

Daily White House press briefings are under scrutiny as Mike Pence says they are “giving some consideration to finding a larger venue on the 18 acres in the White House complex to accommodate the extraordinary interest.” While there could be some logic to that, as the current briefing room has seating for about 50, and standing room for another 35 or so, the press corps is not happy with this move, saying that it “will fight to keep the briefing room and West Wing access to senior administration officials open. We object strenuously to any move that would shield the president and his advisers from the scrutiny of an on-site White House press corps.”  Some speculate that the additional capacity is nothing more than an effort by Trump to pack the audience with his own supporters in order to cheer his announcements and shout down any reporters that ask difficult questions, thus turning the White House briefings into yet another rally. Still others wonder if the Trump team is considering getting rid of the daily press briefings altogether, expecting us to rely solely on Twitter communiques for our information.

A recent Twitter exchange (how else does anyone in the current regime communicate???), White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, NBC’s Chuck Todd,  and CNN Chief National Security Correspondent Jim Schiutto:

Spicer: Regardless of party, @acosta behavior was rude, inappropriate and disrespectful. He owes @realDonaldTrump and his colleagues an apology

Todd: There’s nothing in the first amendment about being polite (hashtags removed for clarity)

Spicer: Your right Chuck, I wasn’t quoting the constitution and didn’t bring up 1st Amend. Sad you defend this tho

Schiutto: CNN’s @Acosta reports Trump spokesman @seanspicer told him he’ll be kicked out of future press confs if he presses hard for ques again

Spicer: Not true, but par for the course in terms of the false reporting

The bottom line and crucial question is this: Could the White House, i.e. Trump, suspend the press passes for individual journalists or media outlets.  The simple answer is that yes, in all likelihood they could, but it is seen as unlikely, as it would not be a smart move.  But then … look who we are talking about.

“Because administrations generally don’t want to be seen as deciding who is or isn’t a qualified journalist, it’s unheard of for a reporter to be suspended for the quality of his or her reporting or behavior, though there are a few notable cases of reporters being barred for security reasons.” – Foreign Policy

Adolph Hitler took power in Germany in 1933.  Book burnings began that same year. During the first weeks of 1933, the Nazi regime deployed the radio, press, and newsreels to stoke fears of a pending “Communist uprising,” then channeled popular anxieties into political measures that eradicated civil liberties and democracy.

We are not to that point … yet.  Let us not allow our nation to get there.

“History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people.” –  Martin Luther King, Jr.

XXXI Olympiad

 

rio.jpg

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Tomorrow evening (Friday, 5 August 2016) will mark the opening ceremonies of the Olympics XXXI in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  The decision was announced by the International Olympics Committee (IOC) in 2009 when Rio beat out Copenhagen, Madrid, Chicago and Tokyo for the bid to host the games.  Seven years of preparation.  And now … here we are … almost time for the torch to make its way through the city on the way to Maracana Stadium in time for the opening ceremony.

olympics-parade.jpg

Parade of Nations

Make note that I am not a sports fan … sometimes I watch a bit of the World Series (baseball in the U.S.), but that’s about it.  But the Olympics … the Olympic Games are something special, something above all other sporting events.  I have never watched an opening ceremony that did not bring tears to my eyes.  You see, it isn’t about who can run the fastest, hit a ball the farthest, swim the perfect relay or beat a record in the downhill slalom.  It is about ‘international’.  It is about brotherhood, shared humanity. It is about 206 nations putting aside their differences to come together for two weeks in the spirit of teamwork, sportsmanship, camaraderie and international cooperation. And, of course, it is also about money, but I won’t go down that path today, though I reserve the right to come back to it at a later date.

The 2016 Olympics in Rio have faced challenges that other Olympics have not had:  Zika, terrorist threats, at least three attempts to ‘blow’ out the torch on its long relay, political unrest in Brazil, demonstrations, protests, a ‘doping scandal’, and more.  The IOC takes great pains to keep the games non-political, but this year that was not possible, as Brazil has been embroiled in political turmoil and facing the worst economic crisis since the 1930s.  But that is not to say that other Olympic games have been trouble-free.  Look back to the 1936 Olympic games in Berlin, just as Hitler was coming to a rise in power.

owens.jpgThe city of Berlin was selected as the venue for the XI Olympic games in 1931, two years before the Nazi’s came to power.  But, of course, as we all know, by the time the games were held, Hitler had established a stronghold in Germany and saw the Games as an opportunity to promote his government and ideals of racial supremacy.  Hitler initially intended to bar Jews and black people from participating, but when faced with a boycott by other nations, he relented and allowed all ethnicities to participate.  This would be the last Olympic games to be held for twelve years, until 1948, after the end of World War II.  A total of 49 nations attended the Berlin Olympics, up from 37 in 1932 … compared to 206 this year!  hitler-owensU.S. athlete Jesse Owens won four gold medals in the sprint and long jump events and became the most successful athlete to compete in Berlin while the host country was the most successful country overall with 89 medals total, with the United States coming in second with 56 medals.

 

 

olympics 1972And there were the XX Olympics held in Munich in 1972.  The West German Government was eager to take the opportunity of the Munich Olympics to present a new, democratic and optimistic Germany to the world, as shown by the Games’ official motto, “Die Heiteren Spiele”, or “the cheerful Games”.  Nobody could have known that by the end of the events, the Olympics would turn out to be anything but ‘cheerful’.  On September 5, midway through the games, a group of eight members of the Black September Palestinian terrorist organization broke into the Olympic Village and took nine Israeli athletes, coaches and officials hostage in their apartments. Two of the hostages who resisted were killed in the first moments of the break-in; the subsequent standoff in the Olympic Village lasted for almost 18 hours.  The remaining athletes were killed during a botched rescue attempt.  All but three of the terrorists were also killed.

Will peace reign at the 2016 Olympics?  It is anybody’s guess, but just over a week ago Brazilian authorities arrested 12 people suspected of planning terrorist acts during the games.  Though claiming to have been inspired by Daesh (aka ISIL), the group was comprised of amateurs, Brazilian nationals who were loosely organized.  Of greater concern are a host of threats, some of which have been dismissed, others are being investigated.  Brazil has vowed it will be ready to handle any terror attempt and is working with French SWAT teams to simulate attack scenarios.  While I know we all hope for a peaceful two weeks in Rio, I will not be surprised if there are attempts to disrupt the games. Though exact figures are elusive, it is estimated that some 900 million people watched at least some part of the 2012 Olympics in London, making it the most-watched event in television history.  With the goal of terrorism being to get global attention, the Olympics must be considered most vulnerable.

Terrorism is not the only threat in this year’s Olympic games.  The ongoing outbreak of the mosquito-borne Zika virus has some 18 athletes opting out of the games.  Then there is the Guanabara Bay, whose waters will be used for sailing and windsurfing competitions, and which is heavily polluted. Among the chief causes of the pollution are uncollected trash fed into the bay via polluted rivers and slums along the coast. As an aspect of their bid for the Games, Rio committed to making efforts towards cleaning the bay. However, due to budgetary issues, only 17% of the sewage is currently treated, as opposed to the 80% that was promised.  The athlete’s village has been described as the largest in Olympic history, yet officials have deemed the athletes’ village as ‘unlivable’ and unsafe because of major plumbing and electrical hazards such as blocked toilets, leaking pipes, exposed wiring, and darkened stairwells where no lighting has been installed.

The Olympics are special, because it is a time, an event, that brings nations and people together in the spirit of international cooperation, the spirit of peace.  It is a time where nations put aside their differences.  If only that spirit could carry over into areas of such things as international trade treaties, nuclear disarmament and climate change accords!  This year will be even more special because, as I mentioned in a previous post, there is a new kid on the block, a team comprised solely of refugee athletes from Syria, South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Ethiopia.  Let us hope that there will be peace at the Olympics, that the problems that have plagued Rio as it prepared for the games are resolved, and that the 2016 games do not join the 1936 and 1972 games in the annals of notoriety.

olympics-Rio.jpg