Racism of the Everyday Variety

hijabYesterday, a friend of my neighbor was shopping in a local Kroger, shopping for food to feed her family, when she accidentally bumped her cart into that of another shopper.  She apologized, the other shopper said “no problem”, and the matter should have ended there.  However, as she moved on, she heard the other shopper say to her friend “ISIS”.  The friend of my neighbor, you see, was wearing her traditional hijab.


The picture below was taken in Florence, Kentucky on 09 July 2016.  blacks sign


A Hispanic friend walked into a fast food restaurant and waited to be served, but the employee continued doing busy-work around the store, cleaning up and pretending not to even see my friend. Then a white woman entered the store and the employee served that woman first, while my friend continued to wait.


When we think or speak of racism, we think of the big, glaring examples, like KKK rallies, Trump speeches, police shootings of unarmed blacks, anti-anything-but-Caucasian rallies and protests, but racism exists in everyday life.  You can find it, obviously, in the supermarket, on street corners, in schools and in nearly every church across the nation.  U.S. WASPs have darned near perfected the practice of everyday racism.

racism-8We, those of us who are socially and morally conscious of such things, try to combat racism in the U.S. through legal channels and by attacking the institutions that promote or tolerate such behaviour.  That, too, is necessary, but I wonder if perhaps we would be more effective by using what little voice we have to combat the smaller events like those listed above.  For example, had I been shopping and seen the incident between my neighbor’s friend and the other woman, I might have stepped in and explained to the woman that: a) the proper term is Daesh, not ISIS; b) the vast majority of Muslims are not affiliated with terrorist organizations like Daesh; and c) Islam is a religion of peace and love, not hate.  Frankly, by the time I finished with that lady, she probably would have parked her cart and went running out of the store, as you all know how I am once I step up onto my soapbox!  Or, had I been the woman who walked into the fast food place and was immediately waited on, I might have said, “No, she (the Hispanic woman) was here first … please take her order first.”  And I will not even speculate on what I might have done had I come upon the man holding the sign, other than to say I would be calling upon my friends to take up a collection for bail money instead of writing this blog post.

racism-6It is called ‘everyday racism’, and it is relatively small things like this that grow into full-blown racism of the type we see propagated by various organizations, particularly this year in the culture of fear, bigotry and multiple phobias that have been pushed forth by politicians, religious leaders and the media.  People are now afraid to use public restrooms, they are afraid of women wearing a hijab, they are afraid of people who look, speak and act differently than themselves.  We must bring common sense back to the streets.  We must be willing to stand up for our beliefs, the belief upon which this nation is based, that “All Men (and women) Are Created Equal”.  We must be willing to stand up to the bigot and the xenophobe.

For the most part, none of us will ever have the opportunity to destroy the KKK, to be instrumental in passing laws that provide safe haven for Muslims, or to bring dirty cops to justice.  But that does not mean we are powerless.  We have the power to apply our values, our convictions, if only we dig down within ourselves to find the courage to do so.  Certainly it is far easier to walk away, to turn our heads and pretend that we just do not see.  But I can tell you that when you put your head on your pillow tonight, whether you wish it or not, your conscience will either reward you for standing up for your beliefs, for your fellow human being, or will cause you to question why you did not.  Think about it.

Two Schools of Thought

There are two distinctly different schools of thought about whether Trump’s status as ‘presumptive nominee’ helps or hurts Hillary Clinton.  Strangely, both of these thoughts have merit and I am as yet undecided which will prevail.

On the side of his presumptive nomination being a deal-breaker in favor of Hillary, Trump is despised by most all democrats and a large portion of republicans alike.  He is the least qualified, least experienced party-affiliated candidate I can remember ever making it this far in the election process.  He has alienated entire groups of people: African-Americans, Hispanics, Muslims, women, immigrants, disabled people, academicians and scholars.  Clinton, on the other hand, is well qualified, has experience not only in domestic policy-making but also in foreign policy.  She supports civil rights and equality for all, she supports important topics like raising minimum wage, environmental protection and education.  It is rather like weighing the merits of eating a sugary donut vs. an apple, with Trump as the donut (though there is nothing actually sweet about him) and Clinton, the apple.

Thus one would think … but therein lies the problem.  One would think Trump wouldn’t stand a chance against an experienced, qualified candidate of the other party.  But, if we think back over the past ten months, we didn’t think he would get this far.  We didn’t think people would ever take the man seriously, and I am not sure they actually do take him seriously, but they vote for him anyway.  Why do they vote for someone who they know is not qualified to govern this nation?  They do so because of one thing and one thing only:  he tells them what they want to hear.  And willingly they believe because they want to believe, need to believe.  He first creates the need, the want, and then he tells them that he is the answer to those needs and wants.

Trump plays on the fears of terrorism, puts forth the fallacy that Muslims, Middle-Eastern immigrants, are responsible for terrorism and that there are so many of them in this country that we are in constant danger.  He stirs that pot relentlessly, and then, when the Islamophobia reaches a peak, he provides the “answer”.  He says he and he alone can fix the problem by deporting all Muslims, all immigrants of Middle-Eastern extraction.  Not only that, but he will “bomb the shit out of” Daesh and kill the family members, including children, of any and all suspected terrorists.  See how he first created a fear (terrorism), then a need (safety from terrorists), and then a solution (extinction).  This is but one example of his marketing blitz.

Trump is a businessman, and there is little difference between his tactics of creating a need, then fulfilling the need, and the tactics that businesses use called ‘advertising’.  He is marketing himself in much the same way that Mattel markets Barbie dolls and other toys.  They advertise them on Saturday mornings when your little kids are glued to television cartoons, then your kids are convinced they need as certain toy.  Never mind that the toy will not fulfill any real need and thus will be forgotten within a few short months, or even hours, and never mind the money you wasted.  The toy company got what they wanted and they really do not care if your child actually plays with the toy or not.  Just as Trump creates a need then promises a solution, a solution that he cannot possibly fulfill.  But people believe because they want to.  They need to.

All of which explains the second school of thought, which is that, while many democrats are thinking that Trump just handed the presidency to Clinton, it may not actually be so.  Certainly when one steps away from Trump’s rhetoric and realizes that he cannot come through with virtually any of his promises, then Clinton looks like the better option.  But … those who so desperately want and need to believe that there is an easy solution to the problems, real or imagined, of the nation, they believe Trump’s promises because they need to.  That is why we cannot simply assume that Trump cannot beat Clinton.  Trump has brought people away from logical thinking and plays, instead, on emotions.

What does it take to shed light on the fallacies that Trump is filling the airwaves with?  Almost all of his rhetoric has been proven to be lies, yet people do not seem to care.  What does it take to bring back humanitarian values that Trump has shredded?  So I ask again, what would it take to shock Trump’s blinded followers enough that they would see the reality that is Donald Trump?  In January, Trump made the statement that “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters.” In January I scoffed at such a statement, but now I suspect he may have been right.  This is a sad statement, not so much about Donald Trump, but about the state of mind of many of the citizens of our nation. Trump cannot win on merit, but he may well win on bluster.

Trump cannot possibly follow through on 90% of his promises if he is elected. The foundation upon which our entire government rests will not permit it.  I suspect that most voters, in some part of their minds, know this.  They just do not care anymore.  They just want somebody to tell them it will all be okay, someone they can hand their troubles to and go to bed feeling secure.  Never mind that it is a false sense of security.  Is there a simple solution, a simple way to put Trump back in his box?  I doubt that there is a panacea, but the ultimate solution must be comprised of educating the voters, which is 80% the role of the media, who have frankly been doing a lousy job of it.  It must also require that Clinton do a better job of marketing her policy beliefs, playing up her strong points and addressing those that are concerning in a forthright and honest manner.  And last, but not least, it requires We The People to stop being lemmings and start thinking … thinking of what a Trump presidency would really mean, thinking of truth vs. falsehoods, and start questioning what the candidates are saying, start thinking with logic instead of sheer emotion.  We need to think on a global, not an individual basis.  For it is not about just one person.  Perhaps John F. Kennedy said it best in his famous quote, and one of my personal favourites: “My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.”

W H Y ? ? ?

I find that the majority of my friends and fellow bloggers agree with my assessment of Donald Trump, but a few have made it abundantly clear that they view him as some saviour, a man who will “make America great again”. They want me to sit down, shut up, and write about sweet puppy dogs and days spent fishing on a riverbank. Well, folks, much as I wish I could shut up about Trump, much as I would rather be playing with a sweet puppy, or fishing on a river bank, I cannot. However, I will make you this promise: when the citizens of this country get on board the “Dump Trump” train and wake up from whatever zombie-state they have been in of late, when they start to smell the really rotten odor emanating from the Trump camp, then I vow I will write not another single word about the man. Meanwhile, until that happens, like a bad penny I will keep coming back with more … and more … and more. No, I do not do it to annoy my friends and followers … I can find easier ways to do that! All joking aside, I do it because I have lived a long time and seen a lot, heard a lot. Today, some of the worst of our history seems to be poised on the brink of repeating itself, and I am not alone in seeing this. I do not know that I can play a role in stopping this disaster, but I feel a commitment to try.

First off … no, I did not attend the Trump rally near my home on Sunday. I think I am glad that I didn’t, as I would have felt too ill, I am certain, to have done anything else the rest of the day. However, that is not why I did not go. Apparently the tickets were gone before the announcement was even publicized. Interesting that. People started lining up, IN THE RAIN, at 11:00 p.m. the night before, a full 15 HOURS BEFORE the event was to begin. I don’t need any further evidence that these people are not sane, intelligent beings! There were only, according to the news, about 40 protestors. There is still a part of me that wishes I could have been protestor #41, but not if it meant standing in the rain for 15 hours! I wouldn’t do that to see somebody I like! I am smarter than that. Besides, they say the pen is mightier than the sword, so I guess for now, at least, I will continue to protest from my comfortable chair with my laptop, and a cup of coffee within reach. Writing in the hope of helping people rub the sleepy-dust out of their eyes and open them.

The local county sheriff, Richard Jones, spoke before Trump arrived and apparently not only endorsed Trump but said he (Trump) “will win Ohio.” Jones has long been known for his anti-immigrant stance. Jim Neil, sheriff of neighboring Hamilton County (includes Cincinnati, Ohio) also attended the rally, though he did not speak. Neil later apologized to the citizens of his county for attending. Smart man.

The demographics of the U.S. breaks down roughly as follows:

• 17% – Latino & Hispanic
• 13.2% – African-American
• 62.6% – White, non-Hispanic
• 7.2% – Other
• 50.8% – Female

According to the laws of common sense, the Latino & Hispanic community would seem unlikely to vote for him based on his derogatory remarks and unconscionable actions, such as:

• Calling Hispanic immigrants “criminals” and “rapists,” saying that Mexico sends only “criminals”; calls for a wall to be built to keep Mexicans out, despite credible data proving that more Mexicans are leaving this country than are coming in.

• Mexican-American journalist Jorge Ramos was forcibly removed from the presidential candidate’s Iowa press conference simply for asking a question.

• Trump’s anti-Latino remarks have cost him several business partners since the launch of his campaign in June, including NBC Universal, which aired Trump’s reality show “The Apprentice”

However, the laws of common sense appear to have been turned inside out this year, as some 18% of Hispanics polled declared their preference for Trump.  WHY?

Women have also been the subject of Trump’s derision and sexist remarks:

• “All of the women on The Apprentice flirted with me—consciously or unconsciously. That’s to be expected.”

• “I think the only difference between me and the other candidates is that I’m more honest and my women are more beautiful.”

• “You know, it doesn’t really matter what [the media] write as long as you’ve got a young and beautiful piece of ass.”

• He has also referred to women as “fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals.”

And yet, 30% or women polled support him. WHY?

How does a candidate who holds political rallies in Alabama with supporters screaming “white power” and has been endorsed by the KKK, as well as neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer, receive over 20 percent support of African-American voters in a national poll? WHY??

Despite the oft-repeated charges that Trump hates Muslims, a March 1 poll conducted by CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, found that 18 percent of American Muslims are now Republican, and Trump is their favored nominee.  WHY???

Trump did scale back his venomous rhetoric when it comes to Jews, presumably because his daughter converted to Judaism in 2009. Jews, however, being particularly sensitive to religious-based hatred, for obvious reasons, are not supportive of Trump. However, a small percentage, mostly younger Orthodox Jews, claim that Trump is their candidate of choice. WHY?? Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu has even rebuked Trump for his hardline stance regarding Muslims.

I am genuinely puzzled that within each of the groups above, there are individuals who either do not take Trump seriously and think his criticism is “all in fun, all in jest”, or they have no pride, no sense of self-respect. Among my African-American friends, Muslim friends and Hispanic friends, I do not know of a single one who would consider voting for Trump.  However, I have several female friends who adamantly support him.  And this, I do not get … I just do not get it.  Did my generation and the ones who came before fight so hard for equal rights, just to give it all up in favor of a man who clearly sees us as nothing more than a sex object?  Meanwhile, does anybody have an answer to my questions of WHY??? If so, please share in the comment section so that I can quit lying awake at night trying to figure it out. Thanks!