Blood on Their Hands

“I’m the only candidate on stage who isn’t bought and paid for, so I can say this — the climate change agenda is a hoax … And so the reality is more people are dying of bad climate change policies than they are of actual climate change … This isn’t that complicated guys, unlock American energy, drill, frack, burn coal, embrace nuclear ”  Vivek Ramaswamy, GOP debate, 23 August 2023  Translation:  Eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die.

I wasn’t pleased with any of the candidates’ answers regarding climate change on Wednesday night, but Ramaswamy’s comments blew my mind.  If ever I wanted to smack somebody upside the head …

But folks, if ANY Republican gets into the White House in 2025, the environment will be doomed, for there is an overall Republican plan by the Heritage Foundation, the conservative think tank that directs most GOP policy, to destroy the environment.  Why?  Oh come on … you don’t need me to tell you why.  One simple answer:

The Heritage Foundation has ties to fossil fuel billionaire Charles Koch.  Need I say more?

The document by the Heritage Foundation is called Project 2025 and is a scary literal blueprint for every aspect of governing in the first 180 days when/if a Republican takes control of the White House in 2025.  The 920-page document outlines everything including economics, limited government, free markets and free trade, tax cuts, reduced government spending, privatization, and the reduction of government run welfare programs in favor of private-sector nonprofits.  I plan to cover more about Project 2025 in the coming months, but for now I’m only talking about how the plan would deal with climate change and the future of life on the planet.

According to an article last month in The Guardian

The guide’s chapter on the US Department of Energy proposes eliminating three agency offices that are crucial for the energy transition, and also calls to slash funding to the agency’s grid deployment office in an effort to stymie renewable energy deployment, E&E News reported this week.

The plan, which would hugely expand gas infrastructure, was authored by Bernard McNamee, a former official at the agency. McNamee was also a Trump appointee to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. He previously led the far-right Texas Public Policy Foundation, which fights environmental regulation, and served as a senior adviser to the Republican senator Ted Cruz.

Another chapter focuses on gutting the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and moving it away from its focus on the climate crisis. It proposes cutting the agency’s environmental justice and public engagement functions, while shrinking it as a whole by terminating new hires in “low-value programs”, E&E News reported. The proposal was written Mandy Gunasekara, who was the former chief of staff at the EPA under Trump.

The guide also features a chapter on the Department of the Interior written by William Perry Pendley, who controversially led the Bureau of Land Management under President Trump and worked to eliminate drilling regulations.

None of the candidates at the debate earlier this week would commit to following through on climate regulations to attempt to get greenhouse gas emissions under control or to any other major climate regulations.  I suspect that each of the eight have read the Heritage document and signed on to it wholeheartedly.  And we already know what the elephant who wasn’t in the room thinks.  Our lives, the lives of our children and grandchildren, of the future of the world, matter not one whit to these arseholes … the only thing that matters is that almighty dollar/pound/yen/euro.

This isn’t only about the U.S., people … every single person on Planet Earth has a stake in how the U.S. handles environmental issues, for what any one country does affects EVERY person in EVERY country.  Republicans are still living back in the day when we thought we were autonomous, and they still reject globalism, but to do so is utterly ignorant.  Step outside about 2:00 p.m. and tell me that climate change isn’t real, that it isn’t killing us!  Tell it to the people living in Maui, or Southern California.

Anyone who votes for a Republican next year will have the blood of our future generations on their hands, in my book.

Who Will Pay For This One???

Ohio-based FirstEnergy Solutions filed for bankruptcy this week.  I cannot say I’m sorry, for they brought it on themselves.  I’m sorry for the average-Joe who has money invested in FirstEnergy, sorry for the company’s employees who stand to lose their livelihood, but I have no empathy for the major shareholders, nor for the company’s executives.  Now, you might have seen this in the news, shrugged, and moved on to juicier news, like the latest about Stormy Daniels, figuring it doesn’t have much to do with you.  WRONG!

First things first.  The reason the power company is in self-inflicted financial trouble is its determination to tie itself to coal and nuclear plants instead of diversifying into renewable energy and other types of electric generation.  Whether Rick Perry, Scott Pruitt or Donald Trump choose to believe it, climate change is real and therefore the fossil fuel industry is a dying breed, being replaced by cleaner, cheaper renewable energy sources.  FirstEnergy failed to open its eyes, it beat a dead horse too long, and now it, too, is dying.

Worse yet, though, is the fact that FirstEnergy believed We The People should bail them out, despite their mortal wounds being self-inflicted. Two days before filing for bankruptcy, FirstEnergy asked Energy Secretary Rick Perry to use the department’s emergency powers to keep its coal and nuclear power plants open.  The company wanted Perry to declare an emergency in the power industry, saying the nation’s security would be jeopardized if the power plants were not kept open.  There is no national security threat here and industry officials and experts were largely angered by the request.

FirstEnergy Solutions’ coal and nuclear plants have been struggling to compete in the competitive power markets because of low wholesale power prices, a trend that has been sustained by low natural gas prices, rising renewable energy penetration, and relatively flat electricity demand — a result of consumer awareness and more energy-efficient appliances. For two years, FirstEnergy has realized they had problems, yet have done nothing more than warn that they might soon seek bankruptcy relief, assuming they would be bailed out by the taxpayers.

Back in January, Rick Perry came up with a plan to raise consumer energy bills in order to subsidize coal and nuclear power plants, in accordance with Trump’s determination to slow the progress of wind and solar energy.  Fortunately, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) unanimously rejected Perry’s plan (there are a few level heads left in Washington, it would seem).

In September 2017, Perry fabricated a threat to national security by saying that power grids using renewables were subject to instability and that FERC should force consumers to pay billions of extra dollars for coal and nuclear power plants that are already obsolete.

PJM Interconnection, the grid operator for FirstEnergy as well as others, said in September that there was no threat to national security and that “there was no need to use the agency’s emergency powers to keep FES’ five big power plants operating.”

In the bankruptcy suit, in addition for asking relief from the more than $1 billion owed to Bank of New York Mellon Trust Co., the company is seeking to be released from power purchase agreements with renewable energy producers.  The contracts were necessary at the time to acquire sufficient credits to meet state renewable portfolio standards, but they are no longer needed now, since the regulations have been largely gutted.

The upshot:

If Rick Perry decides to give in to the company’s request for the Department of Energy to declare an emergency, here’s what would happen.  The grid operator, PJM, would be forced to dispatch power from FirstEnergy’s coal and nuclear plants effectively before any other.  This means that while plants generating electricity through gas, wind or solar may be doing so much more economically, FirstEnergy would get to go to the head of the line.  The only good news is that it would protect the jobs of the nearly 3,000 employees of FirstEnergy.  The immediate downside is twofold:

  • It would hurt other energy companies, especially those who provide electricity from clean, renewable sources.
  • It would raise the price of electricity to consumers – both individuals and businesses – in the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic states.

Obviously there are other, more long-range consequences.  The fossil fuel industry is dying, and no matter how much of our money they throw at it, Trump/Pruitt/Perry cannot revive it in the long run.  When businesses start having to pay more for their electricity … guess what, folks?  They start charging more for their goods & services.  And then there is the added damage to an already sick environment, the parameters of which I cannot even begin to quantify.

This bankruptcy is making other fossil fuel-based energy companies nervous.  Remember Murray Energy?  They issued a statement that reads, in part:

“Murray Energy Corporation expresses our sincere sympathies to the management and employees of FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. (“FES”), during this very difficult time.  Indeed, what makes this matter even more hurtful is that this bankruptcy could have been avoided, had the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) done its job and enacted the Department of Energy’s September 29, 2017 Grid Resiliency Pricing Rule, which sought to ensure the reliability, resiliency, and security of the electric power grids in our Country.  As a result of FERC’s failure, critical power plants will close, thousands of American jobs will be lost, and the reliability, resiliency, and security of our electric power grids will be forever compromised …”

Whatever happens, it is almost a given that the consumer will be on the raw end of this deal.  What I find more concerning is the blatant disregard of Rick Perry, as head of the Department of Energy, and Trump, as the leader of the nation, to see that they are beating a dead horse, and that it is we who will pay the price.

The wind is at our backs now, with red states leading the way

In the current administration, where we all fear that fossil fuel output, dangerous and destructive oil pipelines, and coal mining will return to their heyday, at a devastating cost to our environment, my blogger-friend Keith has positive news on renewable energy sources and their continuity in spite of Trump and Pruitt! Please take a few moments to read Keith’s post and drop him a comment to let him know you appreciate a bit of positive news! Thank you Keith, both for the post and the unspoken permission to share!

musingsofanoldfart

While our President is not a fan of wind energy (having unsuccessfully sued the Scottish government to stop an offshore development) and has made some climate change is a hoax comments, rather quietly, renewable energy continues to move up the charts. Solar energy is going like gangbusters with double-digit growth in production and jobs, but wind energy has surpassed hydro energy as the largest form of renewable energy in the US. What is interesting, most of the growth in wind energy is occurring rather quietly in mostly red states.

From an American Energy News article last week:

Texas has more than 20 MW of installed wind capacity, or nearly a quarter of the market. Iowa is the second-biggest wind state, and Oklahoma overtook California for third place at the end of 2016.

 The first offshore wind project in the United States also came online in the fourth quarter…

View original post 365 more words