You could be forgiven for not noticing what Donnie Trump was up to this week, amid all the news of the coronavirus spiking, Trump’s embarrassing rally in Tulsa, his asinine comments in Phoenix, and the GOP barking about it’s police reform bill that was not much more than some mumbo jumbo that would have changed not a damn thing.
Meanwhile, Donald Trump was once again trying to repeal ACA, this time filing a legal brief urging the Supreme Court to strike down The Affordable Care Act, aka Obamacare, even as coronavirus cases climb across the U.S. and soaring unemployment forces millions off employer-based health plans.
Yo!!! Republicans!!! Are you listening? Do you understand what it will mean if the Supreme Court lets your beloved Trump have his way? More than 2.3 million cases of the coronavirus, and meanwhile some 27 million people have lost their health insurance due to loss of employment, and Trump wants to repeal the Affordable Care Act … now. Says Trump …
“… just so you understand, ObamaCare is a disaster. What we want to do is terminate it.”
I guess whether it is a disaster or a life-saver depends on which side of the wealth divide you stand on. For some 99% of us, it is potentially a life-saver, but for those like Trump who have no financial worries, perhaps it is seen as a disaster, for it costs them a few bucks, and those guys are tight with a nickel.
Even Senator John Cornyn, a republican from Texas, who has voted against ACA numerous times, is now urging people to take advantage of it …
“The good news is that if you lose your employer-provided coverage, which covers about 180 million Americans, then that is a significant life event, which makes you then eligible to sign up for the Affordable Care Act — and as you know, it has a sliding scale of subsidies up to 400 percent of poverty.”
The Court will not hear the arguments until the next term which begins in October, and a decision is unlikely before the November 3rd election.
In other news … remember those $1,200 stimulus checks that were paid out in April as part of the $2.3 trillion stimulus bill passed by Congress? Well, the implementation of the disbursements covered under that bill has been a nightmare, just as we all figured it would. Trump refused any oversight of how the money going to help businesses would be allocated, and the bulk of it has gone to big businesses, rather than the small businesses that most needed it. But about those $1,200 checks … turns out the IRS sent more than one million of those checks to … dead people. Yep, leave it to our federal government to royally screw up anything they are tasked with.
The cost to We the Taxpayer for their screwup? Potentially as much as $1.4 billion … yes, billion! So how did this happen? Well, to distribute the money, the Treasury Department used 2019 tax return records, but it did not use “third-party data,” such as the death records maintained by the Social Security Administration (SSA), to determine whether the person was still alive. The IRS is in the process of trying to get the money back, but they admit that they do not have plans to actively pursue it. Ah well, what’s $1.4 billion of our hard-earned tax dollars, eh?

Steve Mnuchin
But that’s not all! About those loans to small businesses … we who funded this project might want to know where the money went … not too much to ask, is it? But, according to Secretary of Treasury Steven Mnuchin, it is. By the end of May, we had spent more than $500 billion on some 4.5 million loans, but … to whom? Mnuchin told a Senate committee earlier this week …
“As it relates to the names and amounts of specific PPP loans, we believe that that’s proprietary information.”
Even the Government Accountability Office (GAO), which is charged with oversight of the program, has struggled to get information from the administration. Several media outlets have filed a joint Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking the identities of businesses that received loans through the PPP program. The Project on Government Oversight plans to file a separate FOIA request seeking the data.
So much for transparency and accountability in our government.
And another tidbit you might have missed … Trump & Co have decided they no longer want to apprise Congress in advance when they sell arms to foreign countries. The reason? According to Foreign Policy magazine, administration officials say they are tired of regular efforts by Capitol Hill to review arms exports to Saudi Arabia and other nations.
Lawmakers have tried to block weapons sales to countries like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates because of concerns about human rights issues and the prospect of civilian casualties, particularly with the Saudi-led coalition’s war against Iran-backed rebels in Yemen. It seems to be mostly Secretary of State Mike Pompeo who is tired of not being able to do as he wishes without having to seek the approval of Congress.
There will still be formal notification to Congress, but in many cases the formal notification does not give Congress sufficient time to assess the potential sale and put forth objections or concerns. Again … Trump seems to chafe at the reins of congressional oversight, thinking he should be able to do as he wishes without the consent and advice of Congress. Another corner of the Constitution lit afire.
And on that note, have a nice day!
I was excited to think of a woman finally appearing on a bill, and especially excited to see that woman be Harriet Tubman. I used to teach a Black History class every February for Black History Month, and while there were many men and women who fought the fight against slavery, and then later to gain civil rights, Ms. Tubman was always one of my favourites. Her courage and dedication were exceeded by none. Not only did she devote her life to racial equality, she fought for women’s rights alongside the nation’s leading suffragists.
So, she was to replace Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill. Let me tell you just a little bit about Andrew Jackson. He was a slaveowner, known for his cruel treatment of slaves. At one point, he owned as many as 161 slaves and was well-known for brutally whipping them in public and putting them in chains. He was also the man who was responsible for the forced removal of Native Americans from their ancestral lands. Jackson’s Indian Removal Act resulted in the forced displacement of nearly 50,000 Native Americans and opened up 25 million acres of Native American land to white settlement. Tens of thousands died during forced removals like the Trail of Tears in what is now Oklahoma.
Altogether it is believed that she made some thirteen trips to guide a total of approximately 70 slaves to freedom via the Underground Railroad, and then came the Civil War. Harriet Tubman remained active during the Civil War. Working for the Union Army as a cook and nurse, Tubman quickly became an armed scout and spy. The first woman to lead an armed expedition in the war, she guided the Combahee River Raid, which liberated more than 700 slaves in South Carolina.
Compare these two people. Andrew Jackson’s face is on the $20 bill, and Harriet Tubman’s was scheduled to be as of next year, but those plans have been nixed until 2028. Why??? Because Treasury Secretary and bootlicker Steve Mnuchin does not wish to upset Donald Trump, whose hero is the abhorrent Andrew Jackson, that’s why!


So, how did Trump respond when al-Sissi arrived at the White House for a visit on Tuesday?
Care to know some of what happens when a nation becomes ‘bankrupt’ and cannot pay its debt? In part, domestic savers and investors, anticipating a fall in the value of the local currency, will scramble to withdraw their money from bank accounts and move it out of the country. To avoid bank-runs and precipitous currency depreciation, the government may shut down banks and impose capital controls. As punishment for default, capital markets will either impose punitive borrowing rates or refuse to lend at all. And credit-rating agencies will no doubt warn against investing in the country.
And while our debt increases, while our trade deficits are skyrocketing, while farmers are losing their life savings, Donald Trump wants to spend billions more dollars to build a useless, unneeded wall on our southern border. As I said … it would seem his goal is to take what he, his family, and his rich cronies can get during his four-year term and destroy the rest.
Remember back in 2015-2016, that long, ugly, disgusting, tiresome campaign Trump conducted? Yeah, who could forget, right, especially since he doesn’t seem to realize that the 2016 election has ended and the campaign is over, so he keeps holding more and more of his really crappy rallies where he still has his minions chanting “Lock her up!”, even though they have forgotten who it was he wanted locked up. One of the many things that he spent that year-and-a-half (have I mentioned that it was a very looooooong year-and-a-half?) shoving down people’s throats was how he was going to “drain the swamp”, a euphemism for getting rid of corruption in the federal government. Well, we now know, thanks to Kellyanne Conway, that Trump uses a different dictionary, a different vocabulary than we do, called ‘alternative facts’, and that by ‘drain the swamp’, what he really meant was he was planning to bring in much more lethal, corrupt, greedy, criminal gators ‘n crocs.
But what Steve Mnuchin, Secretary of the Treasury Department, is suggesting is that the basis, or what you paid for that stock, should be adjusted for inflation in the calculation of capital gains. Thus, it could be argued that the $1,000 you paid in 2000, adjusted for inflation, is equivalent to $1,100, thus wiping out your capital gain and BINGO — you now owe no taxes on that gain! Now, when you consider that for the wealthy those capital gains may be in the millions of dollars, well you can only imagine how much they would save in taxes. You and I won’t benefit more than a few dollars, if that, but people like Donald Trump, Betsy DeVos, and a host of others, stand to save hundreds of thousands in taxes.
NIKKI HALEY
LA psychologist Robby Strong
Here is the rest of the story…